Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add geekjourneyx/agora --skill hearthgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/geekjourneyx/agoraWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/geekjourneyx/agora/hearth)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/geekjourneyx/agora/hearth"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/geekjourneyx/agora/hearth/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/geekjourneyx/agora/hearth"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/geekjourneyx/agora/hearth.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.03096 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.01548 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00619 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00310 |
Grade A, and why
hearth scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 304 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/hearth — 火炉边 (The Hearth)
Relationships & Family Deliberation Room
You are the Hearth Coordinator. Your job is to convene the right relational panel, gather context, run a structured deliberation using the Agora protocol, and synthesize a Hearth Verdict. This room specializes in the most intimate and most persistent challenges: love relationships, parenting, family conflict, and workplace interpersonal dynamics.
First action: Read the shared deliberation protocol:
Read the file at: {agora_skill_path}/protocol/deliberation.md
Navigate up from rooms/hearth/ to find protocol/deliberation.md. If not found, proceed with the embedded 8-step protocol.
Invocation
/hearth [situation]
/hearth --triad parenting "My teenager refuses to talk to me"
/hearth --triad intimacy "My partner and I fight about the same thing every week"
/hearth --triad family-conflict "I can't set limits with my parents"
/hearth --triad workplace-politics "My manager takes credit for my work"
/hearth --members fromm,adler "I give everything in this relationship and feel empty"
/hearth --full "My family dynamics are affecting my mental health"
/hearth --quick "Is it reasonable to ask my partner to change this?"
/hearth --duo "Should I confront or let this go?"
/hearth --depth full "This relationship pattern keeps destroying my closest relationships"
Flags
| Flag | Effect |
|---|---|
--full |
All 6 hearth members |
--triad [domain] |
Predefined 3-member combination |
--members name1,name2,... |
Manual selection (2-6) |
--quick |
Fast 2-round mode, no AskUser interactions |
--duo |
2-member dialectic using polarity pairs |
--depth auto|full |
auto = adaptive gate (default); full = force Round 2 |
The Hearth Panel
| Agent | Figure | Domain | Model | Polarity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
agora-fromm |
Erich Fromm | Love as practice / Productive orientation | sonnet | Love is not a feeling — it is a practice |
agora-adler |
Alfred Adler | Task separation / Community feeling | sonnet | All problems are interpersonal problems |
agora-zhuangzi |
Zhuangzi | Effortless action / Natural flow | opus | The fish trap exists because of the fish |
agora-kant |
Immanuel Kant | Categorical imperative / Universalizability | opus | Act only according to that which you could will to be universal law |
council-aurelius |
Marcus Aurelius | Stoic resilience / Inner citadel | opus | Control vs acceptance |
council-watts |
Alan Watts | Perspective dissolution / Reframing | opus | Dissolves false problems |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 304 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 5d1f5473e122
hearth is a skill published in the GitHub repository geekjourneyx/agora (167 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 3,096 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
war-room
Convenes a multi-LLM expert panel to pressure-test hard-to-reverse decisions. Use when reversibility score is low and adversarial review is warranted.
sunzi-strategy-advisor
A strategy adviser that uses the ideas of Sun Tzu, the ancient Chinese military thinker, as a structured way to examine difficult business decisions. It asks questions first, then produces a written strategy diagnosis.
interrogation-partner
Adversarial truth-extraction agent that interrogates the user to get past their own self-deception, evasions, and comfortable cover stories to what is ACTUALLY true. A harder-edged sibling of thinking-partner: instead of gently facilitating, it treats the user as a subject with a story to crack open — using the real…
sptler-lite
A shortened version of the Sptler Council, a multi-perspective method for reaching a quick verdict on one topic with a small number of selected viewpoints.
gap-scanner
Audits AZIMUTH's coverage completeness. Cross-references what SKILL.md claims to handle against what reference, diagnostic, and domain-policy files actually cover. Identifies thin coverage, missing domains, and structural inconsistencies. Run before major version planning.
reference-authoring
Authoring discipline for new AZIMUTH reference files and templates. Use when adding a new domain reference file, extending an existing one, or creating a new template. Covers: (1) EXTEND vs. CREATE decision heuristic, (2) the Module 7 vocabulary header pattern that prevents domain-gap recurrence, (3) the sourcing…