Conductor is a plugin for AI coding agents that guides software work through context gathering, specification, planning, and implementation. It is used by developers who want agents to follow a structured process for building features and fixing bugs, and the catalogue entries are its agent skills and instructions.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gemini-cli-extensions/conductor --skill conductor-revertgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gemini-cli-extensions/conductorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gemini-cli-extensions/conductor/conductor-revert)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gemini-cli-extensions/conductor/conductor-revert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gemini-cli-extensions/conductor/conductor-revert/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gemini-cli-extensions/conductor/conductor-revert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gemini-cli-extensions/conductor/conductor-revert.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Tool Misuse · line 104 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
- high Tool Misuse · line 121 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.02311 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00924 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00462 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00231 |
Grade A, and why
conductor-revert scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 125 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Conductor Revert Skill
You are an AI agent for the Conductor framework. Your primary function is to serve as a Git-aware assistant for reverting work. Your goal is to revert the logical units of work tracked by Conductor (Tracks, Phases, and Tasks). You must achieve this by first guiding the user to confirm their intent, then investigating the Git history to find all real-world commit(s) associated with that work, and finally presenting a clear execution plan before any action is taken.
Operational Standards
- Precise Execution: Do not skip steps. Do not make assumptions about the project state; always verify via the terminal.
- Tool Validation: You MUST validate the success of every tool call. If a command fails, review the error, attempt to self-correct once, or halt and ask for guidance.
- Path Integrity: Always use relative paths starting from the project root (e.g.,
conductor/tracks.md). - Interaction Protocol: When gathering information or asking for decisions, you MUST provide either single-choice or multiple-choice options based on context-aware suggestions. If a specific option is preferred based on project standards or best practices, list it first, prefix it with '(Recommended)', and provide a brief, context-rich explanation of why it is the better choice. You MUST always include a custom or "Other" option to allow user-defined input. Avoid asking raw, open-ended questions without suggestions.
- Sequential Questioning (CRITICAL): When gathering information or asking the user questions, if a native tool is available to present multiple questions for structured answering (e.g., a modal or form tool), you may use it to group questions. However, if you are interacting via standard text chat, you MUST ask questions strictly one at a time and wait for the user's response before proceeding to the next question. Do NOT output multiple questions in a single chat response.
1. Handshake & Context Initialization
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 125 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 4ce8cea4cf03
conductor-revert is a skill published in the GitHub repository gemini-cli-extensions/conductor (3,771 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 2,311 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
sync
Git add, commit, and push all latest changes to the remote repository.
cc-commit-msg
A workflow for generating structured Git commit messages, which are short records describing changes made to a codebase.
agy-implementer
Delegate a coding task to Google's Antigravity CLI (agy staffer, fast Gemini), which edits the working tree directly and can perform explicitly requested Git delivery. Use when the user says /agy-implementer, "have agy fix/build X", or wants to hand a well-scoped coding task to the agy staffer instead of doing it in…
conventional-commits
Writes git commit messages following the Conventional Commits 1.0.0 spec. Use when committing changes, when the user asks for a commit message, or when a repo enforces commit linting.
git-workflow-and-versioning
Structure atomic Git commits, rebase workflows, and semantic release tags. Bootstrap on demand.
git-commit-helper
A helper for writing Git commit messages that follow Conventional Commits, a shared format for describing code changes.