Gentleman.Dots is a personal development-environment configuration for Neovim, shells, terminal multiplexers, terminal emulators, and related command-line tools. Developers use it to install and configure a consistent coding setup, with an AI development layer managed separately through gentle-ai. The catalogue skills and instruction belong to that configured AI workflow.
Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Gentleman-Programming/Gentleman.Dotsnpx agentmods add skills/gentleman-programming/gentleman.dots/gentleman-installerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gentleman-programming/gentleman.dots/gentleman-installer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gentleman-programming/gentleman.dots/gentleman-installer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gentleman-programming/gentleman.dots/gentleman-installer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gentleman-programming/gentleman.dots/gentleman-installer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gentleman-programming/gentleman.dots/gentleman-installer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Tool Misuse · line 173 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 173 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.01790 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00716 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00358 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00179 |
Grade A, and why
gentleman-installer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 279 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Adding new installation steps
- Modifying existing tool installations
- Working on backup/restore functionality
- Implementing non-interactive mode support
- Adding new OS/platform support
Critical Patterns
Pattern 1: InstallStep Structure
All steps follow this structure in model.go:
type InstallStep struct {
ID string // Unique identifier: "terminal", "shell", etc.
Name string // Display name: "Install Fish"
Description string // Short description
Status StepStatus // Pending, Running, Done, Failed, Skipped
Progress float64 // 0.0 - 1.0
Error error // Error if failed
Interactive bool // Needs terminal control (sudo, chsh)
}
Pattern 2: Step Registration in SetupInstallSteps
Steps MUST be registered in SetupInstallSteps() in model.go:
func (m *Model) SetupInstallSteps() {
m.Steps = []InstallStep{}
// Conditional step based on user choice
if m.Choices.SomeChoice {
m.Steps = append(m.Steps, InstallStep{
ID: "newstep",
Name: "Install Something",
Description: "Description here",
Status: StatusPending,
Interactive: false, // true if needs sudo/password
})
}
}
Pattern 3: Step Execution in executeStep
All step logic goes in installer.go:
func executeStep(stepID string, m *Model) error {
switch stepID {
case "newstep":
return stepNewStep(m)
// ... other cases
default:
return fmt.Errorf("unknown step: %s", stepID)
}
}
func stepNewStep(m *Model) error {
stepID := "newstep"
SendLog(stepID, "Starting installation...")
// Check if already installed
if system.CommandExists("newtool") {
SendLog(stepID, "Already installed, skipping...")
return nil
}
// Install based on OS
var result *system.ExecResult
if m.SystemInfo.IsTermux {
result = system.RunPkgInstall("newtool", nil, func(line string) {
SendLog(stepID, line)
})
} else {
result = system.RunBrewWithLogs("install newtool", nil, func(line string) {
SendLog(stepID, line)
})
}
if result.Error != nil {
return wrapStepError("newstep", "Install NewTool",
"Failed to install NewTool",
result.Error)
}
SendLog(stepID, "✓ NewTool installed")
return nil
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 279 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 8a71d1f6080a
gentleman-installer is a skill published in the GitHub repository Gentleman-Programming/Gentleman.Dots (2,063 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 1,790 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
gentleman-installer compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gentleman-installerGentleman-Programming/Gentleman.Dots | Skill | 2.1k | 26d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 34 | Claude Code, Codex |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 133k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 99k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Skill | 79k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 200 | Claude Code, Codex |
| systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers | Skill | 313k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code |
| next-partial-prefetching-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 103 | Claude Code |