Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev --skill analisador-erro-medicogit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev/analisador-erro-medico)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev/analisador-erro-medico"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev/analisador-erro-medico/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev/analisador-erro-medico"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev/analisador-erro-medico.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00081 | $0.05370 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00041 | $0.02685 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.01074 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00537 |
Grade A, and why
analisador-erro-medico scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 411 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<quando_usar> <ativar_quando> - Usuário pede para "analisar caso médico" ou "avaliar erro médico" - Usuário menciona "negligência médica", "imperícia", "imprudência" - Usuário quer "avaliar conduta médica" ou "desvio de conduta" - Documentos de caso médico (prontuário, laudos, exames) estão disponíveis - Usuário precisa de "relatório de análise de erro médico" - Contexto de responsabilidade civil médica para decisão judicial - Usuário menciona "standard of care" ou "padrão de cuidado" </ativar_quando>
<nao_usar_quando> - Apenas pesquisa de jurisprudência sobre erro médico (usar pipeline-pesquisa) - Elaboração de sentença ou decisão (usar pipeline-sentenca) - Análise de questões administrativas/disciplinares do CRM - Caso sem documentação médica disponível - Análise exclusivamente de responsabilidade penal (foco é civil) </nao_usar_quando> </quando_usar>
```
# RELATÓRIO DE ANÁLISE DE ERRO MÉDICO
**Caso:** [identificação]
**Data da análise:** [data]
**Metodologia:** Playbook de 10 Etapas — Padrão-Ouro (MBE + Frameworks de Segurança do Paciente)
```
**Red flags de admissibilidade imediata:** cirurgia em local errado, corpo estranho retido, morte intraoperatória em procedimento eletivo de baixo risco, reação adversa com alergia documentada, alta seguida de reinternação em menos de 24h.
**Decisão:** ADMITIR (prosseguir) ou REJEITAR (fundamentar) ou SOLICITAR DOCUMENTAÇÃO.
**Primários:** prontuário completo, exames, prescrições, consentimento informado, sumário de alta, atestado de óbito (se aplicável)
**Secundários:** laudo pericial, protocolos institucionais, escalas de plantão, registros de enfermagem
**Complementares:** guidelines vigentes à época, literatura médica relevante
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 411 lines · 81 tokens per session scan A 9d7bcfaeab2f
analisador-erro-medico is a skill published in the GitHub repository georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev (22 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 81 tokens to every session and 5,370 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
analytical-method-validation
Plan, execute, and document validation, verification, and transfer of analytical procedures under the governing framework - ICH Q2(R2) and Q14, USP / / , ICH M10 bioanalytical, CLSI EP, or ISO/IEC 17025. Use for HPLC, LC-MS/MS, GC, CE, ICP-MS, dissolution, qNMR, qPCR, NIR, and ligand binding or cell-based assays…
nature-paper-to-patent
Convert scientific papers, theses, technical reports, source code, figures, inventor notes, or research manuscripts into evidence-grounded Chinese invention patent drafts and attorney-facing technical disclosure materials. Use when an AI agent must mine patent points, draft or revise a Chinese technical disclosure…
auditing-part11-trails
Generates and verifies 21 CFR Part 11-style audit trails — who/what/when, electronic signatures, and tamper-evidence — for OpenMed pipelines in GxP and clinical-trial (GCP) settings. Use when the user runs OpenMed in a regulated/validated environment and needs an attributable, time-stamped, tamper-evident record of…
generating-synthetic-surrogates
Replace detected PHI with realistic, type-matched fake values in OpenMed so clinical notes stay readable and parseable instead of full of [REDACTED] markers. Use when the user wants surrogate names, MRNs, addresses, or dates rather than opaque masks, needs consistent fake identities across a document, must keep notes…
shifting-clinical-dates
Apply consistent per-patient date shifting in OpenMed that preserves intervals between events while satisfying HIPAA Safe Harbor's date rule. Use when the user needs to de-identify dates but keep temporal structure for research, shift all dates by the same offset per patient, preserve days-between-events for survival…
fda-database
Query openFDA API for drugs, devices, adverse events, recalls, regulatory submissions (510k, PMA), substance identification (UNII), for FDA regulatory data analysis and safety research.