Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add getcrew44/crew44 --skill ai-shaped-readiness-advisorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/getcrew44/crew44Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/getcrew44/crew44/ai-shaped-readiness-advisor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/getcrew44/crew44/ai-shaped-readiness-advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/getcrew44/crew44/ai-shaped-readiness-advisor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/getcrew44/crew44/ai-shaped-readiness-advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/getcrew44/crew44/ai-shaped-readiness-advisor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Data Exfiltration · line 244 Code or instructions that leak agent conversation context to external services, potentially exposing sensitive user interactions.Fix: Remove any code that sends prompts, responses, or session data externally. Preserve user privacy; never exfiltrate conversation content.
- high Memory Poisoning · line 570 Skill manipulates agent memory, state, or stored context. Memory corruption can alter personality, override safety rules, or cause unpredictable behavior.Fix: Protect agent memory and state from modification by untrusted content. Use read-only memory for critical instructions and validate all state changes.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.09767 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.04883 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.01953 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00977 |
Grade A, and why
ai-shaped-readiness-advisor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- ai-shaped-readiness-advisor — 98% identical, 26 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 924 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Purpose
Assess whether your product work is "AI-first" (using AI to automate existing tasks faster) or "AI-shaped" (fundamentally redesigning how product teams operate around AI capabilities). Use this to evaluate your readiness across 5 essential PM competencies for 2026, identify gaps, and get concrete recommendations on which capability to build first.
Key Distinction: AI-first is cute (using Copilot to write PRDs faster). AI-shaped is survival (building a durable "reality layer" that both humans and AI trust, orchestrating AI workflows, compressing learning cycles).
This is not about AI tools—it's about organizational redesign around AI as co-intelligence. The interactive skill guides you through a maturity assessment, then recommends your next move.
Key Concepts
AI-First vs. AI-Shaped
| Dimension | AI-First (Cute) | AI-Shaped (Survival) |
|---|---|---|
| Mindset | Automate existing tasks | Redesign how work gets done |
| Goal | Speed up artifact creation | Compress learning cycles |
| AI Role | Task assistant | Strategic co-intelligence |
| Advantage | Temporary efficiency gains | Defensible competitive moat |
| Example | "Copilot writes PRDs 2x faster" | "AI agent validates hypotheses in 48 hours instead of 3 weeks" |
Critical Insight: If a competitor can replicate your AI usage by throwing bodies at it, it's not differentiation—it's just efficiency (which becomes table stakes within months).
The 5 Essential PM Competencies (2026)
These competencies define AI-shaped product work. You'll assess your maturity on each.
1. Context Design
Building a durable "reality layer" that both humans and AI can trust—treating AI attention as a scarce resource and allocating it deliberately.
What it includes:
- Documenting what's true vs. assumed
- Immutable constraints (technical, regulatory, strategic)
- Operational glossary (shared definitions)
- Evidence standards (what counts as validation)
- Context boundaries (what to persist vs. retrieve)
- Memory architecture (short-term conversational + long-term persistent)
- Retrieval strategies (semantic search, contextual retrieval)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 924 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A c710afad17d1
ai-shaped-readiness-advisor is a skill published in the GitHub repository getcrew44/crew44 (359 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 9,767 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-evaluation-engineering
An AI evaluation engineering specialist for testing models and prompts. The description does not provide enough detail to state which concrete operations it performs.
mdc-langchain
Definitive guidelines for writing maintainable, performant, and robust LangChain applications using modern best practices (LCEL, LangGraph, Pydantic, createagent).
mdc-tensorflow
This guide defines the definitive best practices for writing TensorFlow code, focusing on tf.keras for models, tf.data for input pipelines, and @tf.function for performance, ensuring reproduc...
mdc-vllm
Definitive guidelines for writing high-performance, maintainable, and production-ready LLM inference code using vLLM.
research-academic-plotting
Generates publication-quality figures for ML papers from research context. Given a paper section or description, extracts system components and relationships to generate architecture diagrams via G...
provider-model-discovery
Descobre e seleciona modelos de providers LLM de forma report-only: inventário read-only de modelos, docs oficiais, quota/billing/rate gates e shortlist para canary protegido. Use antes de adicionar providers, escolher modelos ou migrar monitores/roteamento.