Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/gethouston/houston/debugnpx skills add gethouston/houston --skill debuggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gethouston/houstonWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00038 | $0.00688 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00344 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00138 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00069 |
Grade A, and why
debug scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- debug — 89% identical, 14 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/debug
NEVER guess. Logs always faster than speculation.
The rule
Bug occurs + fix not obvious →
- Read log files FIRST. They have all errors.
- Diagnose from ACTUAL error in logs. Not assumptions.
- Not enough info? Add targeted
tracing::debug!()(Rust) orlogger.debug()(TS). - Never ask user to copy-paste terminal output. Read logs directly.
Log locations
| Layer | File | Contents |
|---|---|---|
| Backend | ~/.houston/logs/backend.log |
Rust tracing — sessions, agent store, channels, watcher |
| Frontend | ~/.houston/logs/frontend.log |
JS console.error/warn, React crashes, Tauri cmd failures |
Both daily rolling. Latest = current file.
Logging APIs
Rust
tracing::info!("session {id} started");
tracing::warn!(?error, "unexpected");
tracing::error!(?err, "failed to write");
tracing::debug!(agent = %agent_id, "received event");
Output → backend.log via tracing-subscriber + daily rolling file appender.
Levels: default info globally. debug for houston_terminal_manager + houston_tauri. Override: RUST_LOG=debug,crate_name=trace.
Frontend
import { logger } from "@/lib/logger";
logger.error("fetch failed", { url, status });
logger.warn("retry", { attempt });
logger.info("user clicked");
logger.debug("render", { props });
Also console.error + console.warn patched to auto-write to frontend.log.
Bug reports
"Report bug" button on error toasts auto-attaches last 50 lines from both logs.
Adding tracing when logs insufficient
- Identify suspected code path
- Add
tracing::debug!(?relevant_vars, "descriptive message")at branch points - Commit to
claude/wip - Ask user to reproduce
- Read updated logs
- Fix w/ actual knowledge
Don't leave debug logs in. Remove after fix or downgrade to trace!.
Anti-patterns
- ❌ "Let me try X and see if it fixes it" → guess
- ❌ "Can you share the terminal output?" → read the logs yourself
- ❌
unwrap()to silence compile errors → hides real failure - ❌
let _ = x.awaiton ops that can fail → silent failure (banned by style rules)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 86 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 13978fe40821
debug is a skill published in the GitHub repository gethouston/houston (108 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 688 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…