XcodeBuildMCP is an MCP server and command-line tool that gives coding agents tools for building and working on iOS and macOS projects. It supports workflows involving Xcode and xcodebuild, including project builds and device-related operations. Its catalogue add-ons provide agent instructions and connections for using the MCP server and CLI.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to getsentry/XcodeBuildMCP. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/getsentry/XcodeBuildMCP/main/.agents/skills/xcodebuildmcp-packaging-resource-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/getsentry/XcodeBuildMCPWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/getsentry/xcodebuildmcp/xcodebuildmcp-packaging-resource-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/getsentry/xcodebuildmcp/xcodebuildmcp-packaging-resource-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/getsentry/xcodebuildmcp/xcodebuildmcp-packaging-resource-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/getsentry/xcodebuildmcp/xcodebuildmcp-packaging-resource-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/getsentry/xcodebuildmcp/xcodebuildmcp-packaging-resource-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 35 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 43 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.00343 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00137 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00069 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
xcodebuildmcp-packaging-resource-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
XcodeBuildMCP Packaging and Resource Review
Review guardrails for package/build/resource integrity and portable distribution.
Review scope
- Review-only by default.
- Do not edit product code unless the user explicitly requests implementation changes.
Files to inspect
package.jsonscripts/copy-build-assets.jsscripts/package-macos-portable.shscripts/build-website-manifest.mjsschemas/**manifests/**skills/**bundled/**when present- Resource-root utilities when touched
Guardrails
- Published package
filesincludes required runtime resources. - Portable package includes
build,manifests,bundled,skills,package.json, and production dependencies. - AXe binary/framework expectations remain verified.
- Wrapper scripts preserve
XCODEBUILDMCP_RESOURCE_ROOTandDYLD_FRAMEWORK_PATH. - Schemas and manifests stay available in installed and portable layouts.
- Do not assume build outputs exist before
npm run build. - Avoid network-dependent packaging behavior without verification/checksums.
Validation
npm run build- Packaging-specific when touched:
npm run package:macos -- --help(if supported)npm run verify:portableafter artifact creation
npx skill-check .agents/skills/xcodebuildmcp-packaging-resource-review
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 44 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 8f32d05bec43
xcodebuildmcp-packaging-resource-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository getsentry/XcodeBuildMCP (6,506 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 343 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Reviews a supplied code path or diff for correctness, security, maintainability, and style without executing or modifying it.
reviewing-update-sets
Reviewing, analyzing, and comparing ServiceNow update sets before promotion, singly or in batches. Shows changes, risks, dependencies, and conflicts. Use when the user mentions update sets, customizations, promotion, code review, change tracking, pre-deployment review, sysupdatexml, customer updates, 'what changed in…
gitlab-review
Review a GitLab merge request, inspect changes and discussions, or prepare and post explicitly requested review feedback. Use for GitLab MRs and review follow-ups, not GitHub pull requests or automatic approval/merge.
pr-reviewer
Review a requested pull request, branch diff or completed task against its actual scope, source and checks. Prepare evidence and comments; post or record a human verdict only when explicitly authorized.
knowledge-audit
Review and clean up stored memories — find duplicates, contradictions, stale entries, and consolidate.
review-guidelines
Additional code review guidelines specific to this codebase. Auto-loaded by the review agent during PR reviews to enforce project conventions.