requesting-code-review

requesting-code-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from GGbond-bo/MemOmics-Agent. It costs 20 tokens per session (2,128 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of requesting-code-review, MIT.

A pre-commit review process that checks code changes before they are committed or pushed. It combines security checks, quality checks, and review by a separate agent, with an optional fix-and-check cycle.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after implementing a feature or fix, before committing, pushing, or merging changes in a Git repository.
Why use it?
It catches problems before your changes enter the repository. A separate review context can find issues that the agent that wrote the code overlooked.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Good fit Use it after implementing a feature or fix, before committing, pushing, or merging changes in a Git repository.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ggbond-bo/memomics-agent/requesting-code-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add GGbond-bo/MemOmics-Agent --skill requesting-code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GGbond-bo/MemOmics-Agent

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for requesting-code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ggbond-bo/memomics-agent/requesting-code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ggbond-bo/memomics-agent/requesting-code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ggbond-bo/memomics-agent/requesting-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ggbond-bo/memomics-agent/requesting-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for requesting-code-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ggbond-bo/memomics-agent/requesting-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ggbond-bo/memomics-agent/requesting-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 20 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,128 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 94% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00020 $0.02128
Opus 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00851
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00004 $0.00426
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00213

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 1126afb626b3, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

requesting-code-review scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Runs shell commandslowCapability

Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.

os.system(f"ls {user_input}")
Origin

This is a copy

94% identical to requesting-code-review — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

hermes-agent/skills/software-development/requesting-code-review/SKILL.md · 281 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 281 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Pre-Commit Code Verification

Automated verification pipeline before code lands. Static scans, baseline-aware quality gates, an independent reviewer subagent, and an auto-fix loop.

Core principle: No agent should verify its own work. Fresh context finds what you miss.

When to Use

  • After implementing a feature or bug fix, before git commit or git push
  • When user says "commit", "push", "ship", "done", "verify", or "review before merge"
  • After completing a task with 2+ file edits in a git repo
  • After each task in subagent-driven-development (the two-stage review)

Skip for: documentation-only changes, pure config tweaks, or when user says "skip verification".

This skill vs github-code-review: This skill verifies YOUR changes before committing. github-code-review reviews OTHER people's PRs on GitHub with inline comments.

Step 1 — Get the diff

git diff --cached

If empty, try git diff then git diff HEAD~1 HEAD.

If git diff --cached is empty but git diff shows changes, tell the user to git add <files> first. If still empty, run git status — nothing to verify.

If the diff exceeds 15,000 characters, split by file:

git diff --name-only
git diff HEAD -- specific_file.py

Step 2 — Static security scan

Scan added lines only. Any match is a security concern fed into Step 5.

# Hardcoded secrets
git diff --cached | grep "^+" | grep -iE "(api_key|secret|password|token|passwd)\s*=\s*['\"][^'\"]{6,}['\"]"

# Shell injection
git diff --cached | grep "^+" | grep -E "os\.system\(|subprocess.*shell=True"

# Dangerous eval/exec
git diff --cached | grep "^+" | grep -E "\beval\(|\bexec\("

# Unsafe deserialization
git diff --cached | grep "^+" | grep -E "pickle\.loads?\("

# SQL injection (string formatting in queries)
git diff --cached | grep "^+" | grep -E "execute\(f\"|\.format\(.*SELECT|\.format\(.*INSERT"

Step 3 — Baseline tests and linting

Detect the project language and run the appropriate tools. Capture the failure count BEFORE your changes as baseline_failures (stash changes, run, pop). Only NEW failures introduced by your changes block the commit.

Read the full file on GitHub · 281 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 281 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 1126afb626b3

Subscribe to this mod's changes

requesting-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository GGbond-bo/MemOmics-Agent (30 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 2,128 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). It is 94% identical to requesting-code-review, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 65 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens