pr-screenshots

pr-screenshots is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from github/gh-aw. It costs 17 tokens per session (1,065 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A procedure for capturing Playwright screenshots of visual changes and placing them in GitHub pull request descriptions. Playwright is a browser-testing tool, and a pull request is a proposed code change for review.

In plain words
What is it for?
Taking screenshots of docs sites, UI components, generated pages, and other visual changes, then adding them to pull requests.
Why use it?
It lets reviewers see UI or generated-page changes without checking out the branch. The screenshots stay with the review instead of being committed as project files.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex ✓ vendor

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Taking screenshots of docs sites, UI components, generated pages, and other visual changes, then adding them to pull requests.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/github/gh-aw/pr-screenshots
About the project

GitHub Agentic Workflows is a GitHub CLI extension that lets developers define AI-assisted repository automation in Markdown and run it through GitHub Actions. It is intended for tasks requiring interpretation or reasoning, such as issue triage, pull-request review, CI investigation, documentation maintenance, and dependency analysis. The catalogue entries provide skills and agents for working with these workflows.

github/gh-aw · 5,435 stars · on GitHub · gh.io

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add github/gh-aw --skill pr-screenshots
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/github/gh-aw

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for pr-screenshots

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/github/gh-aw/pr-screenshots/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/github/gh-aw/pr-screenshots)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/github/gh-aw/pr-screenshots"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/github/gh-aw/pr-screenshots/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for pr-screenshots

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/github/gh-aw/pr-screenshots"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/github/gh-aw/pr-screenshots.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 17 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,065 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 4 findings, up to high

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • high Tool Misuse · line 62
    Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).
    Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
  • medium Excessive Agency · line 12
    Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
    Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
  • medium Excessive Agency · line 130
    Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
    Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
  • medium MCP Rug Pull · line 137
    npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.
    Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00017 $0.01065
Opus 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00426
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00003 $0.00213
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00106

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 504020228ca1, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

pr-screenshots scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

4 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

.squad/templates/skills/pr-screenshots/SKILL.md · 150 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 150 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Context

When a PR includes visual changes (docs sites, UI components, generated pages), reviewers need to see what the PR delivers without checking out the branch. Screenshots belong in the PR description body, not as committed files and not as text descriptions.

Use this skill whenever:

  • A PR touches docs site pages (Astro, Starlight, etc.)
  • A PR adds or changes UI components
  • A PR generates visual artifacts (TypeDoc, Storybook, diagrams)
  • Playwright tests already capture screenshots as part of testing

Patterns

1. Capture screenshots with Playwright

If Playwright tests already exist and produce screenshots, reuse those. Otherwise, write a minimal capture script:

// scripts/capture-pr-screenshots.mjs
import { chromium } from 'playwright';

const browser = await chromium.launch();
const page = await browser.newPage({ viewport: { width: 1280, height: 720 } });

const screenshots = [
  { url: 'http://localhost:4321/path/to/page', name: 'feature-landing' },
  { url: 'http://localhost:4321/path/to/detail', name: 'feature-detail' },
];

for (const { url, name } of screenshots) {
  await page.goto(url, { waitUntil: 'networkidle' });
  await page.screenshot({ path: `screenshots/${name}.png`, fullPage: false });
}

await browser.close();

2. Host screenshots on a temporary branch

GitHub PR descriptions render images via URLs. The gh CLI cannot upload binary images directly. Use a temporary orphan branch to host the images:

# Save current branch
$currentBranch = git branch --show-current

# Create orphan branch with only screenshot files
git checkout --orphan screenshots-temp
git reset
git add screenshots/*.png
git commit -m "screenshots for PR review"
git push origin screenshots-temp --force

# Build raw URLs
$base = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/{owner}/{repo}/screenshots-temp/screenshots"
# Each image: $base/{name}.png

# Return to working branch
git checkout -f $currentBranch

Read the full file on GitHub · 150 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 150 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 504020228ca1

Subscribe to this mod's changes

pr-screenshots is a skill published in the GitHub repository github/gh-aw (5,435 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 1,065 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.