GitHub Agentic Workflows is a GitHub CLI extension that lets developers define AI-assisted repository automation in Markdown and run it through GitHub Actions. It is intended for tasks requiring interpretation or reasoning, such as issue triage, pull-request review, CI investigation, documentation maintenance, and dependency analysis. The catalogue entries provide skills and agents for working with these workflows.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add github/gh-aw --skill pr-screenshotsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/github/gh-awWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/github/gh-aw/pr-screenshots)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/github/gh-aw/pr-screenshots"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/github/gh-aw/pr-screenshots/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/github/gh-aw/pr-screenshots"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/github/gh-aw/pr-screenshots.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 4 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Tool Misuse · line 62 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 12 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 130 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 137 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.01065 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00426 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00213 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00106 |
Grade A, and why
pr-screenshots scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
4 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- pr-screenshots — 100% identical, 298 lines differ
- pr-screenshots — 100% identical, 298 lines differ
- pr-screenshots — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- pr-screenshots — 100% identical, 298 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 150 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Context
When a PR includes visual changes (docs sites, UI components, generated pages), reviewers need to see what the PR delivers without checking out the branch. Screenshots belong in the PR description body, not as committed files and not as text descriptions.
Use this skill whenever:
- A PR touches docs site pages (Astro, Starlight, etc.)
- A PR adds or changes UI components
- A PR generates visual artifacts (TypeDoc, Storybook, diagrams)
- Playwright tests already capture screenshots as part of testing
Patterns
1. Capture screenshots with Playwright
If Playwright tests already exist and produce screenshots, reuse those. Otherwise, write a minimal capture script:
// scripts/capture-pr-screenshots.mjs
import { chromium } from 'playwright';
const browser = await chromium.launch();
const page = await browser.newPage({ viewport: { width: 1280, height: 720 } });
const screenshots = [
{ url: 'http://localhost:4321/path/to/page', name: 'feature-landing' },
{ url: 'http://localhost:4321/path/to/detail', name: 'feature-detail' },
];
for (const { url, name } of screenshots) {
await page.goto(url, { waitUntil: 'networkidle' });
await page.screenshot({ path: `screenshots/${name}.png`, fullPage: false });
}
await browser.close();
2. Host screenshots on a temporary branch
GitHub PR descriptions render images via URLs. The gh CLI cannot upload binary
images directly. Use a temporary orphan branch to host the images:
# Save current branch
$currentBranch = git branch --show-current
# Create orphan branch with only screenshot files
git checkout --orphan screenshots-temp
git reset
git add screenshots/*.png
git commit -m "screenshots for PR review"
git push origin screenshots-temp --force
# Build raw URLs
$base = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/{owner}/{repo}/screenshots-temp/screenshots"
# Each image: $base/{name}.png
# Return to working branch
git checkout -f $currentBranch
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 150 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 504020228ca1
pr-screenshots is a skill published in the GitHub repository github/gh-aw (5,435 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 1,065 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
watch-pr
Watch a GitHub pull request for CI status, reviews, comments, merge conflicts, and terminal states using the gh-watch extension. Use when the user wants to monitor a PR, wait for CI, or track PR progress.
ci-cd
CI/CD pipelines for GitHub Actions and Docker-based deployments — lint, test, build, push, deploy stages; environment secrets; branch-gated workflows; health-check rollbacks; and PM2/systemd service restarts.
test-conversion-reviewer
Reviewer for converting unit tests to browser tests for Project Bedrock. Invoke this when the user needs to review their work while removing complex Browser dependencies from tests.
cl-link-from-hash
Use this skill to get a link to a Gerrit Changelist (CL) from a given commit hash in the Chromium repository. Use when you need to find the review discussion, comments, or related issues for a specific commit. Don't use for linking to files or code lines.
multi-agent-code-review
Multi-agent consensus-driven code review. Audits changes using security, performance, and style checkers.
sync-proto-review
Reviews changes to Sync protobufs (components/sync/protocol/.proto) for style, backwards/forwards compatibility, and companion updates. Use when reviewing CLs or diffs that modify Sync protos.