metis

metis is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from gitRasheed/metis-skill. It costs 104 tokens per session (3,513 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of metis, MIT.

A coding-work guide for an AI assistant that covers design, implementation, testing, review, and final checks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when adding features, fixing bugs, refactoring, designing APIs, writing tests, reviewing changes, or preparing a commit.
Why use it?
It helps prevent unclear abstractions, tangled control flow, and missed verification steps during larger code changes.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Good fit Use it when adding features, fixing bugs, refactoring, designing APIs, writing tests, reviewing changes, or preparing a commit.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/gitrasheed/metis-skill/clite
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add gitRasheed/metis-skill --skill clite
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gitRasheed/metis-skill

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for metis

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gitrasheed/metis-skill/clite/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gitrasheed/metis-skill/clite)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gitrasheed/metis-skill/clite"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gitrasheed/metis-skill/clite/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for metis

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gitrasheed/metis-skill/clite"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gitrasheed/metis-skill/clite.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 104 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,513 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 86% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00104 $0.03513
Opus 5.5 $0.00042 $0.01405
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00021 $0.00703
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00351

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 42babec97fdf, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

metis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

86% identical to metis — 216 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

evals/cases-v6/arms/CLITE/SKILL.md · 185 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 185 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Metis

Write code that favors plain data, pure logic, clear call sites, and early architectural thinking. These are strong defaults, not rigid laws: follow the surrounding codebase, framework constraints, and language norms when they clearly matter more.

Apply sections by phase instead of holding everything at once:

  • Designing or starting a task: Design principles, LLM agent process
  • Implementing: Working rules, Implementation rules, plus the SOLID checklist for non-trivial modules
  • Writing tests: Testing checklist
  • Reviewing a diff or PR: Code review mode
  • Before claiming done, committing, or pushing: Final verification checklist

Design principles

  1. Start from the call site, by wishful thinking: pretend the perfect helpers already exist, name them the way you would want to call them, and get the top-level usage reading cleanly. If the calling code reads awkwardly, the abstractions are wrong — and you find out before building anything.
  2. Prefer plain data plus focused functions, modules, or systems over behavior-heavy objects. Draw boundaries around what systems do, not what entities are.
  3. Choose the simplest state model that matches reality: discriminated unions for mutually exclusive states, composable data for orthogonal features, and a plain flat record when neither pressure exists — do not over-architect the simple case.
  4. Isolate mutation and I/O near the edges. Orchestration decides what happens; inner helpers do narrow, understandable work.
  5. Push ifs up, fors down. Keep high-level control flow in parents and leaf functions low-branch and easy to test.
  6. Parse, don't validate: at each trust boundary — parsing, persistence, external APIs — convert untrusted data once into a typed shape that cannot represent the invalid states, so downstream code never re-checks it. Past the boundary, assert internal invariants whose failure means a programming error: state transitions, function contracts, positive and negative space.
  7. Prefer explicit, behavior-focused tests without indirection that hides intent.
  8. Sanity-check the likely bottleneck first — network, disk, memory, then CPU. Prefer architecture changes over late micro-optimizations.
  9. Design for the hardest real requirement first, then simplify downward. Do not architect for the easy case and try to scale it up later.
  10. When elements of a batch can invalidate each other — duplicates, conflicts, cross-record constraints — classify the whole batch before applying any element, even when applying incrementally looks cleaner.

Read the full file on GitHub · 185 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 185 lines · 104 tokens per session scan A 42babec97fdf

Subscribe to this mod's changes

metis is a skill published in the GitHub repository gitRasheed/metis-skill (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 104 tokens to every session and 3,513 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to metis, differing in 216 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

necessary-code-audit

A review process for deciding whether code that still has callers is genuinely needed. It examines wrappers, compatibility layers, old public interfaces, fallbacks, defaults, defensive branches, configuration, and duplicate data sources.

danhuaxiansheng/claude-code-cleanup-skills · 119 tokens

unused-code-audit

A code-audit skill for proving whether files, exports, functions, components, types, or helpers have real users before removal.

danhuaxiansheng/claude-code-cleanup-skills · 93 tokens

find-simplifications

Use for a periodic repo-wide sweep of qwen-code for accumulated excess surface — dead components and files, orphaned locale keys, exports nothing consumes, added-then-removed scaffolding — filing candidates on a tracking issue and landing only what a maintainer has said yes to. Repo-wide and evidence-first; every…

QwenLM/qwen-code · 103 tokens

review-work

Post-implementation gate review: run manual QA on the real surface yourself, then launch ONE gate reviewer (never a panel) to audit goal, constraints, code quality, security, missed context, and QA evidence. Use before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work.

code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent · 63 tokens

critical-code-reviewer

Rigorously review code or pull requests for correctness, security, accessibility, maintainability, tests, and edge cases. Use when users request a critical code review, want a guided walkthrough of findings, need implementer-facing feedback, or want to prepare, create, or submit a GitHub pull request review.

posit-dev/skills · 67 tokens

pr-description-writer

Redacta una descripción de pull request clara y estructurada a partir de un diff de git, resumen de rama o lista de commits. Úsalo cuando te pidan escribir una descripción de PR, redactar una solicitud de cambios o documentar cambios de código. Produce una descripción con resumen, motivación, cambios realizados, pasos…

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · 80 tokens