Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add GktuOktay/ai-skills --skill adversarial-code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GktuOktay/ai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gktuoktay/ai-skills/adversarial-code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gktuoktay/ai-skills/adversarial-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gktuoktay/ai-skills/adversarial-code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gktuoktay/ai-skills/adversarial-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gktuoktay/ai-skills/adversarial-code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00085 | $0.00491 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00246 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00098 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
adversarial-code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Adversarial Code Reviewer & Showstopper Inspector
Bu skill, kod yazıldıktan veya refactor edildikten hemen sonra çalışır. Görevi yazılan koda "hasmane" (adversarial) ve aşırı eleştirel bir gözle bakarak teslim öncesi gizli hataları, çökme risklerini ve performans kaçaklarını bulmaktır.
🔍 Denetim Kontrol Listesi (Showstopper Checklist)
-
Uncaught Exceptions & Silent Crashes:
- Unhandled promise rejection var mı?
- Try-catch bloğunda hata yutulmuş mu?
-
Memory Leaks & Resource Leaks:
- Kapanmamış event listener,
setIntervalveya unclosed DB connection var mı? - React
useEffectcleanup fonksiyonu eksik mi?
- Kapanmamış event listener,
-
Concurrency & Race Conditions:
- Aynı anda birden fazla istek geldiğinde state bozulması riski var mı?
- Async/await kullanımında race condition var mı?
-
Security & Type Safety:
- TypeScript
anykaçamakları var mı? - Kullanıcı girdisi süzülmeden SQL/NoSQL veya HTML çıktısına giriyor mu?
- TypeScript
📋 Çıktı Formatı
🧐 Hasmane Kod İncelemesi (Adversarial Audit Results)
- 🔴 Showstopper (Kritik Risk):
[Satır No / Fonksiyon]->[Açıklama ve Çökme Riski]- 🟡 Gizli Mantık Hatası (Edge Case):
[Açıklama]- 🛠️ Düzeltilmiş Güvenli Kod:
[Düzeltilmiş Kod Örneği]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 40 lines · 85 tokens per session scan A b972515787d7
adversarial-code-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository GktuOktay/ai-skills (2 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 85 tokens to every session and 491 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
github
Manages all git operations (commit, push, branch management, PR creation) in a standardized, safe, and consistent way. Automatically runs the code-review skill before any commit. Enforces Conventional Commits standard. Handles the full lifecycle: branch → review → commit → push → PR.
architecture-review
Before committing to an implementation plan, run this skill to stress-test the proposed architecture. Catches over-engineering, circular dependencies, missing failure modes, security gaps, and scalability cliffs — before any code is written. Acts as a "second eye" on the plan.
code-review
Systematic code review skill covering both requesting a review (pre-commit checklist) and receiving and responding to review feedback. Checks code quality, security, test coverage, architectural alignment, and documentation before any code is committed.
git-pr-review
Generate a concise and structured PR description from commit history with minimal token usage.
adapter-audit
Use this skill to audit CLI adapter projects (like opencli) for missing output fields, then batch-generate fixes and submit PRs. Turns AI agents into adapter quality reviewers.
security-auditor-saas
Application security agent that audits code for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities, hardcoded secrets, and common security flaws. Triggers on: security audit, vulnerability scan, OWASP check, security review, penetration test, hardening.