Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add glassity/agent-skills --skill lifecycle-reject-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/glassity/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/glassity/agent-skills/lifecycle-reject-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/glassity/agent-skills/lifecycle-reject-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/glassity/agent-skills/lifecycle-reject-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/glassity/agent-skills/lifecycle-reject-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/glassity/agent-skills/lifecycle-reject-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00078 | $0.00729 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00365 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00146 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00073 |
Grade A, and why
lifecycle-reject-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Reject the plan — bow out of an assignment with a reason
When to use
- The user has read the per-service brief in
project/<slug>-<service>.md, talked it through, and decided it does not apply to their service. - The user says "reject the plan", "this brief doesn't fit my service", "skip this one".
- The assignment's
current_stageisalignment_step_2. This skill re-reads that from the server and stops if it moved.
Binary check
Run command -v glassity before the first CLI call. If it is missing, stop and
tell the user to install it with brew install glassity/tap/glassity or from
https://github.com/glassity/cli/releases. No account yet? Sign up at
app.glassity.cloud.
Pre-flight
-
Re-read the authoritative state:
glassity --output=json opp show-assignment "<assignment-id>"If
current_stageis notalignment_step_2, orstateis already terminal, say the assignment moved under the user and stop. -
Locate the brief:
ls project/*.mdIt will be
project/<slug>-<service>.md. Capture the commit that introduced it withgit log -1 --format=%H -- project/<file>. -
Ask for a one-line reason if the user has not given one. It lands on the status report and is how the leader spots a pattern of bad briefs.
Phase 1 — two mutations, chained
Step A — register the rejected brief
glassity --output=json opp register-assignment-artifact "<assignment-id>" \
--kind plan \
--stage alignment_step_2 \
--path "project/<file>" \
--commit-sha "<sha>" \
--status rejected
Show the verbatim plan; wait for "yes".
Step B — transition to rejected
glassity --output=json opp transition "<assignment-id>" \
--target-state rejected \
--comment "<the user's reason>"
Show the verbatim plan; wait for "yes".
Errors
Same {error: {code, message, remediation}} envelope as
lifecycle-accept-plan:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 86 lines · 78 tokens per session scan A f39f310a5729
lifecycle-reject-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository glassity/agent-skills (2 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 78 tokens to every session and 729 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
recipe-create-meet-space
Create a Google Meet meeting space and share the join link.
workthreads
SpecStory Workthreads - a weekly work-thread rollup across a team's repos from SpecStory coding histories (any agent - Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and more). It groups the window's sessions into threads of work per project and labels each new / open / recently closed, so a lead sees what shipped, what is still…
atmos-config
Atmos root configuration: atmos.yaml discovery, precedence, deep merging, basepath, imports, minimal bootstrap, and routing to narrower Atmos skills.
story-readiness
Validate that a story file is implementation-ready. Checks for embedded GDD requirements, ADR references, engine notes, clear acceptance criteria, and no open design questions. Produces READY / NEEDS WORK / BLOCKED verdict with specific gaps. Use when user says 'is this story ready', 'can I start on this story', 'is…
autotask-creator
Rules for automation CRUD from the group-chat commander. The commander does not call mutation tools and does not edit cloud/autotasks files directly. It emits one or more top-level ... containers in its final text; the bus parses and applies them after the turn.
remove
Remove a deployed framework or addon from the current workspace.