Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gmickel/flow-next --skill flow-next-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gmickel/flow-nextWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gmickel/flow-next/flow-next-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gmickel/flow-next/flow-next-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gmickel/flow-next/flow-next-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gmickel/flow-next/flow-next-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gmickel/flow-next/flow-next-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high System Prompt Leakage · line 177 Skill contains instructions that could directly expose system prompts, internal rules, or hidden instructions to users or external parties.Fix: Remove any instructions that reveal, print, or output system prompts or internal rules. System instructions should never be exposed to end users.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.01534 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00614 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00307 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00153 |
Grade A, and why
flow-next-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 15d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 89 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Flow plan
Turn an idea or an existing spec into a spec with right-sized tasks in .flow/, grounded in repo research. Plan writes no code.
Read working-rules.md first unless you already have this run; it holds for every step of this skill.
.flow/ is the only task tracker. Every spec and task is created or changed through flowctl. A markdown TODO list, a TodoWrite call, or a plan file kept outside .flow/ as the record has broken this.
Preamble
flowctl is bundled, not installed globally (which flowctl fails). Define it once; later blocks here and in steps.md use $FLOWCTL:
FLOWCTL="${CODEX_HOME:-$HOME/.codex}/scripts/flowctl"
[ -x "$FLOWCTL" ] || FLOWCTL="<plugin-root>/scripts/flowctl" # <plugin-root> = the directory two levels above this skill's SKILL.md file (the harness gave you that file's absolute path when the skill loaded); substitute it literally
[ -x "$FLOWCTL" ] || FLOWCTL=".flow/bin/flowctl"
Check once for flowctl copies left by an older install layout:
LEFTOVERS=""
for p in .flow/bin/flowctl .flow/bin/flowctl.cmd .flow/bin/flowctl.py \
.flow/bin/flowctl_bootstrap.py .flow/bin/flowctl-help.txt \
.flow/bin/flowctl_tracker .flow/templates/spec.md .flow/usage.md; do
[ -e "$p" ] && LEFTOVERS="${LEFTOVERS}${p}"$'\n' || true
done # || true: an empty LEFTOVERS (the normal case) must read as success
None present: say nothing. Any present: print one line saying nothing reads them and they can be deleted by hand or by /flow-next:setup, then continue. Never ask, stop, or delete here.
No implementation code
The spec states what and why as contracts; each task states how: named files, the repo pattern to follow (file:line), ordering, and non-obvious gotchas. Code in a plan is limited to signatures and interfaces, pointers to existing patterns, a recent or surprising API from docs-scout, and a gotcha from practice-scout. A full function or module body, or a copy-paste block over about 10 lines, has broken this: implementation happens in /flow-next:work with fresh context, and code written here is paid for again there and drifts.
What ships with it
12 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/openai.yaml 225 B
- references/examples.md 10 KB
- references/existing-id.md 1.7 KB
- references/judge-memory.md 1.1 KB
- references/next-steps-menu.md 2.5 KB
- references/readiness-warn.md 2.7 KB
- references/route-a-refine.md 2.6 KB
- references/selected-review.md 431 B
- references/strategy-alignment.md 2.5 KB
- references/tracker-first-mint.md 2.5 KB
- references/tracker-projection.md 1.5 KB
- steps.md 21 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 15d ago Changed 647c030a6138
- 17d ago Changed · -13 lines 99f48fb3b910
- 19d ago Changed · -89 lines 78a23fb728cb
- 24d ago Changed · +8 lines 522c3649da0f
- 1mo ago Changed c5c067803a3e
- 1mo ago Changed cb26dcd9d3d5
- 1mo ago First seen · 183 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 564c21e90c66
flow-next-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository gmickel/flow-next (712 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,534 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
backlog
Read, work, and maintain a Git repo's deferred-work items in docs/backlog/, one file per item. Use when the user says "backlog", "check backlog", "what's on my backlog", "work the backlog", "address the backlog", "add to backlog", "clean up backlog", or when a review or task produced items that are real but not being…
project-execution
Executes implementation plans with progress tracking, checkpoint validation, and quality gates. Use after planning is complete and tasks are ready to implement.
st-setup-project
Smalltalk (Pharo/Squeak) project boilerplate creator. Use when the user asks to create a new Pharo/Smalltalk project from scratch, when project structure is missing (no src/ directory or .project file), when the user wants to start a new Smalltalk development project, or when setting up BaselineOf, Core, and Tests…
kanban
Use when a prompt contains a new bug/feature/change not yet tracked, or when an item's status changes — capture and maintain it in the project's beads tracker (Inbox→Backlog with Definition of Ready, priorities, the pipe-separated note format).
project-discuss
A project-discussion management workflow that keeps track of decisions, open questions, project context, and incidents. It uses a project's cadence files, which are shared records for ongoing discussions and decisions.
subtask-update
Update subtask with fixes or new steps. Two trigger modes: (A) Auto-called by autoworker:gate-check on FAIL — reads FAIL info, adds supplementary steps. (B) User calls with a finding/bug during testing — diagnoses, fixes, updates subtask. Both modes end by invoking autoworker:dispatch to re-enter the loop.