wenqu-review

wenqu-review is a skill for Claude Code from gogoingai/wenqu-skills. It costs 109 tokens per session (1,776 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A Chinese-language editing review that checks articles, reports, tutorials, project descriptions, and explanatory materials for factual support, clear reasoning, consistent terminology, unnatural translation, AI-like writing, and structure.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a Chinese draft, proofread a document, check an article for problems, or run focused checks while another writing workflow is revising text.
Why use it?
It helps find unsupported claims, unclear passages, inconsistent terms, and formulaic wording before readers encounter them.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: names the AskUserQuestion tool; mentions Claude Code; built for openclaw.

Part of the wenqu-skills plugin — 6 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to review a Chinese draft, proofread a document, check an article for problems, or run focused checks while another writing workflow is revising text.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/gogoingai/wenqu-skills/wenqu-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add gogoingai/wenqu-skills --skill wenqu-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gogoingai/wenqu-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install wenqu-skills, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 6 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for wenqu-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gogoingai/wenqu-skills/wenqu-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gogoingai/wenqu-skills/wenqu-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gogoingai/wenqu-skills/wenqu-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gogoingai/wenqu-skills/wenqu-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for wenqu-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gogoingai/wenqu-skills/wenqu-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gogoingai/wenqu-skills/wenqu-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 109 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,776 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00109 $0.01776
Opus 5 $0.00055 $0.00888
Sonnet 5 $0.00022 $0.00355
Haiku 4.5 $0.00011 $0.00178

Measured 12d ago against content hash a9ea107c98f9, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

wenqu-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

wenqu-review/SKILL.md · 87 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 87 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

文章审查 Skill

📦 项目仓库与源码:https://github.com/gogoingai/wenqu-skills

用户输入工具

当本技能需要用户确认选择、补充必要信息或授权有副作用的操作时:

  1. 优先使用当前运行时提供的原生用户输入工具,例如 AskUserQuestionrequest_user_inputclarifyask_user 或等价能力。
  2. 若没有此类工具,使用带编号或字母选项的文本问答。
  3. 同一决策阶段中彼此独立的问题可合并提问;后一个问题依赖前一回答时,按优先级逐个问。
  4. 已由用户当前指令、调用方或文章偏好提供的信息,不重复询问。
  5. 文中出现的具体工具名均为示例;应替换为当前运行时的等价能力。

两种被使用的方式

审查在一篇文章的生命周期里会被频繁触发,每次只跑一小段(每改一节可能就要过一次语言审查),也会被单独整体触发,两种场景对是否要跑完整一轮 Skill 调用的要求不同:

场景 方式
用户直接说"审查这篇文章"、"看看有没有问题" 独立触发,走完整流程(见下方「审查流程」)
其他写作技能(如 wenqu-write)在写作、修改过程中反复用到 R5、R1、R2、R3 不要每次都用 Skill 工具发起一轮新调用——直接用 Read 工具读取本技能 references/ 下对应的规则文件(如 r1-english.md),内联执行检查,把结果并入调用方流程

工具等价说明:"Skill 工具"是 Claude Code 的跨技能调用机制名。其他 agent 没有这种机制时,按上表第二种方式处理——直接 Read 本技能文件内联执行。


审查流程

先查 references/index.md(核心规则、执行顺序、报告格式)

步骤 文件 内容
R0 references/r0-factcheck.md 来源、真实性与评测叙事核查(对照源码,揪出编造、写错或错配的内容)
R5 references/r5-coherence.md 连贯性与清晰度
R1 references/r1-english.md 英文术语检查(依赖 references/language/glossary.md
R2 references/r2-translation.md 翻译腔审查
R3 references/r3-ai-patterns.md 模式化与空泛表达(依赖 references/language/humanizer-zh.md
R4 references/r4-structure.md 结构自检(默认跳过,用户要求"完整审查"时才跑)
R6 references/r6-style-and-narrative-fit.md 文体与叙事契合(默认跳过,用户要求"完整审查"时才跑)
R7 references/r7-change-closure.md 变更闭环与全篇一致性(完整审查或实质改动收尾时跑)

默认自动模式:触发时按 R0→R5→R1→R2→R3 一次跑完,发现问题直接修,全部完成后统一汇报。用户说"手动审查"时才切换为每步等确认。

用户说"完整审查"、"提交前检查"或"这轮都改完了吗"时,按 R0→R5→R1→R2→R3→R4→R6→R7 执行。R7 必须放在其余问题修复之后,检查这些修改是否在全文、图文和交叉引用中都已同步。


依赖

  • references/language/glossary.mdreferences/language/humanizer-zh.md:本技能自带术语表和 AI 写作模式库,可独立使用
  • 若同时安装了 wenqu-translate:R2 和它的翻译方法论共享同一套欧化语言判断标准,由它在翻译时调用;没装 wenqu-translate 不影响 R2 独立运行
  • 若同时安装了 wenqu-write:R4 会交叉参考它的写作禁止事项清单,增强判断依据,但不是硬依赖——没装也能正常审查
  • 若同时安装了 wenqu-write:R6 优先读取文章存储中的读者画像、背景、范围锁定等上下文,判断当前文章的题材与写作目标;上下文不足时不得擅自把某种文体判错。
  • 若同时安装了 wenqu-write:R7 优先读取本轮确认过的改动清单及文章存储中的 references/change-impact.md;两者都不存在时才以当前 git diff 为线索,并说明覆盖范围受限。
  • 若同时安装了 wenqu-write:R0 读取 materials/index.md 的来源类型、冲突裁决与评测设计;R4 读取 skeleton.mdstatus.md 判断是否偏离确认范围;相关文件缺失时明确说明检查边界,不得假装已核对。

Read the full file on GitHub · 87 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 87 lines · 109 tokens per session scan A a9ea107c98f9

Subscribe to this mod's changes

wenqu-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository gogoingai/wenqu-skills (6 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 109 tokens to every session and 1,776 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.