Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gongyijie85/dsh-ecc --skill cpp-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gongyijie85/dsh-eccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/cpp-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/cpp-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/cpp-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/cpp-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/cpp-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.02293 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00917 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00459 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00229 |
Grade A, and why
cpp-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to cpp-testing — 5 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 326 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
C++ Testing (Agent Skill)
Agent-focused testing workflow for modern C++ (C++17/20) using GoogleTest/GoogleMock with CMake/CTest.
When to Use
- Writing new C++ tests or fixing existing tests
- Designing unit/integration test coverage for C++ components
- Adding test coverage, CI gating, or regression protection
- Configuring CMake/CTest workflows for consistent execution
- Investigating test failures or flaky behavior
- Enabling sanitizers for memory/race diagnostics
When NOT to Use
- Implementing new product features without test changes
- Large-scale refactors unrelated to test coverage or failures
- Performance tuning without test regressions to validate
- Non-C++ projects or non-test tasks
Core Concepts
- TDD loop: red → green → refactor (tests first, minimal fix, then cleanups).
- Isolation: prefer dependency injection and fakes over global state.
- Test layout:
tests/unit,tests/integration,tests/testdata. - Mocks vs fakes: mock for interactions, fake for stateful behavior.
- CTest discovery: use
gtest_discover_tests()for stable test discovery. - CI signal: run subset first, then full suite with
--output-on-failure.
TDD Workflow
Follow the RED → GREEN → REFACTOR loop:
- RED: write a failing test that captures the new behavior
- GREEN: implement the smallest change to pass
- REFACTOR: clean up while tests stay green
// tests/add_test.cpp
#include <gtest/gtest.h>
int Add(int a, int b); // Provided by production code.
TEST(AddTest, AddsTwoNumbers) { // RED
EXPECT_EQ(Add(2, 3), 5);
}
// src/add.cpp
int Add(int a, int b) { // GREEN
return a + b;
}
// REFACTOR: simplify/rename once tests pass
Code Examples
Basic Unit Test (gtest)
// tests/calculator_test.cpp
#include <gtest/gtest.h>
int Add(int a, int b); // Provided by production code.
TEST(CalculatorTest, AddsTwoNumbers) {
EXPECT_EQ(Add(2, 3), 5);
}
Fixture (gtest)
// tests/user_store_test.cpp
// Pseudocode stub: replace UserStore/User with project types.
#include <gtest/gtest.h>
#include <memory>
#include <optional>
#include <string>
struct User { std::string name; };
class UserStore {
public:
explicit UserStore(std::string /*path*/) {}
void Seed(std::initializer_list<User> /*users*/) {}
std::optional<User> Find(const std::string &/*name*/) { return User{"alice"}; }
};
class UserStoreTest : public ::testing::Test {
protected:
void SetUp() override {
store = std::make_unique<UserStore>(":memory:");
store->Seed({{"alice"}, {"bob"}});
}
std::unique_ptr<UserStore> store;
};
TEST_F(UserStoreTest, FindsExistingUser) {
auto user = store->Find("alice");
ASSERT_TRUE(user.has_value());
EXPECT_EQ(user->name, "alice");
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 326 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A a92fb5da9b7e
cpp-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository gongyijie85/dsh-ecc (8 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 2,293 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to cpp-testing, differing in 5 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
hashiiiii-zig
Use when writing, editing, or reviewing Zig implementation, tests, build files, or CI.
golang-testing
Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage, integration tests, idiomatic test naming. Use when writing or reviewing Go tests, choosing a testing approach, setting up Go test CI…
golang-stretchr-testify
Comprehensive guide to stretchr/testify for Golang testing. Covers assert, require, mock, and suite packages in depth. Use when writing tests with testify, creating mocks, setting up test suites, or choosing between assert and require. Covers testify assertions, mock expectations, argument matchers, call verification…
adk-verify-snippets
Checks that every Python code block in a Markdown file actually compiles and runs, by extracting each block to a temporary file, executing it in an isolated subprocess, and writing a pass/fail report with per-snippet coverage. Use when the user asks to verify, test, or validate the code samples in a README, a guide…
adk-setup
Sets up a local ADK Python development environment in a git clone of the open-source adk-python repository: a uv virtual environment, all dependency extras, pre-commit hooks, and a first unit-test run. Runs only when explicitly requested, never on its own. Use when asked to set up, bootstrap, or repair a development…
blink-gc-plugin
Develop, build, test, and roll changes to the Blink GC Clang plugin (//tools/clang/blinkgcplugin). Use when modifying or adding Oilpan/Blink GC Clang plugin checks, running plugin unit tests, checking Chromium/Blink targets for new plugin violations, suppressing violations with GCPLUGINIGNORE, or force-rolling Clang…