Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gongyijie85/dsh-ecc --skill healthcare-eval-harnessgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gongyijie85/dsh-eccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/healthcare-eval-harness)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/healthcare-eval-harness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/healthcare-eval-harness/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/healthcare-eval-harness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/healthcare-eval-harness.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.02077 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.01038 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00415 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00208 |
Grade A, and why
healthcare-eval-harness scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
81% identical to healthcare-eval-harness — 29 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 209 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Healthcare Eval Harness — Patient Safety Verification
Automated verification system for healthcare application deployments. A single CRITICAL failure blocks deployment. Patient safety is non-negotiable.
Note: Examples use Jest as the reference test runner. Adapt commands for your framework (Vitest, pytest, PHPUnit, etc.) — the test categories and pass thresholds are framework-agnostic.
When to Use
- Before any deployment of EMR/EHR applications
- After modifying CDSS logic (drug interactions, dose validation, scoring)
- After changing database schemas that touch patient data
- After modifying authentication or access control
- During CI/CD pipeline configuration for healthcare apps
- After resolving merge conflicts in clinical modules
How It Works
The eval harness runs five test categories in order. The first three (CDSS Accuracy, PHI Exposure, Data Integrity) are CRITICAL gates requiring 100% pass rate — a single failure blocks deployment. The remaining two (Clinical Workflow, Integration) are HIGH gates requiring 95%+ pass rate.
Each category maps to a Jest test path pattern. The CI pipeline runs CRITICAL gates with --bail (stop on first failure) and enforces coverage thresholds with --coverage --coverageThreshold.
Eval Categories
1. CDSS Accuracy (CRITICAL — 100% required)
Tests all clinical decision support logic: drug interaction pairs (both directions), dose validation rules, clinical scoring vs published specs, no false negatives, no silent failures.
npx jest --testPathPattern='tests/cdss' --bail --ci --coverage
2. PHI Exposure (CRITICAL — 100% required)
Tests for protected health information leaks: API error responses, console output, URL parameters, browser storage, cross-facility isolation, unauthenticated access, service role key absence.
npx jest --testPathPattern='tests/security/phi' --bail --ci
3. Data Integrity (CRITICAL — 100% required)
Tests clinical data safety: locked encounters, audit trail entries, cascade delete protection, concurrent edit handling, no orphaned records.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 209 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A 0c74bb0309d4
healthcare-eval-harness is a skill published in the GitHub repository gongyijie85/dsh-ecc (7 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 2,077 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 81% identical to healthcare-eval-harness, differing in 29 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
manage-taskboard
Manage work in the native DeepSeek Harness Taskboard with exact task ids and optimistic versions. Use when an Agent must inspect project work, claim an eligible todo, record progress or blockers, verify an implementation, submit it for human review, or release its own claim; also use when a human asks how to accept…
delivery-proof
Delivery proof and the doublecheck report. Use when the work is done and the delivery must be proven — consolidate the spec, test timeline, review verdicts, and verification checks into a doublecheckreport, and only then claim completion.
red-green-tdd
Red/green test discipline for implementation work. Use once a doublecheck spec is on record and implementation is about to start — write a test that fails for the missing behavior, run it to see it fail (red), make the change, run again to see it pass (green).
codebase-design-zh
A set of design principles for creating modules with small interfaces and substantial behaviour behind them. It explains terms such as interface, implementation, adapter, and seam in plain terms for this design approach.
code2skill-review-flow
A read-only reviewer for the main user flows in a package generated by Code2Skill. It checks whether representative paths are basically usable, without proving that every source-code detail is included.
bio-workbench
A set of rules for running reproducible bioinformatics analyses, which study biological data with software. It uses small self-contained scripts, recorded inputs and outputs, environment details, and version history so results can be repeated.