agentmods.dev

coding_qa.review

coding_qa.review is a skill for Claude Code from gpsaggese/helpers. It costs 13 tokens per session (270 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A Python code review workflow that looks for bugs, makes the smallest necessary fixes, and supplies test cases with expected results. Python is a programming language commonly used for scripts and services.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review Python files, locate their matching tests, explain each issue with line references, provide corrected code, and describe expected test outcomes.
Why use it?
It combines issue finding, corrections, and edge-case tests so a change can be checked without changing the program's intended behaviour.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

not rated 158repo +1 today A scan 13 tokens original Apache-2.0

Good fit Use it to review Python files, locate their matching tests, explain each issue with line references, provide corrected code, and describe expected test outcomes.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/gpsaggese/helpers/coding_qa.review
View source ↗ gpsaggese/helpers
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add gpsaggese/helpers --skill coding_qa.review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gpsaggese/helpers

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for coding_qa.review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gpsaggese/helpers/coding_qa.review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gpsaggese/helpers/coding_qa.review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gpsaggese/helpers/coding_qa.review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gpsaggese/helpers/coding_qa.review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for coding_qa.review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gpsaggese/helpers/coding_qa.review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gpsaggese/helpers/coding_qa.review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 13 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 270 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00013 $0.00270
Opus 5.5 $0.00005 $0.00108
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00003 $0.00054
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00027

Measured yesterday against content hash 6b4bba9fb617, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

coding_qa.review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/coding_qa.review/SKILL.md · 33 lines

What it actually says

  • You are a senior Python engineer

Goal

  • I will pass you Python files <INPUT_FILE>
  • Find the unit test file <TEST_FILES> for each input file, in the format tests/test_<INPUT_FILE>, e.g., tests/test_foo.py for foo.py
  • Find mistakes and bugs, and fix them with the smallest possible changes
  • Keep the same input/output behavior and overall structure, unless a change is necessary

Output

  • Return:
    • A short list of the issues, with line references
    • A corrected version of the code
    • A one-line reason why each fix works
    • A few test cases, including edge cases, with expected outputs, in the format: 
      - Observed behavior / error message: ...
- Expected behavior: ...

Verification

  • Every issue cites a line reference in <INPUT_FILE>
  • The fix keeps the original input/output behavior and structure, unless a change was necessary
  • Each fix has a one-line explanation of why it works
  • Test cases, including edge cases, have expected outputs
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 33 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 6b4bba9fb617

Subscribe to this mod's changes

coding_qa.review is a skill published in the GitHub repository gpsaggese/helpers (158 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 270 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-06.

Code reviewTestingUnit testing
Related

coding_qa.review compared with skills from other repositories

coding_qa.review next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
coding_qa.reviewgpsaggese/helpersSkill158todayApache-2.0A13Claude Code
pull-requestspingdotgg/t3codeSkill50ktodayMITA34Claude Code, Codex
test-reviewdatahub-project/datahubSkill13ktodayApache-2.0A0Claude Code, Codex
grade-testsdotnet/skillsSkill5.8ktodayMITA119Claude Code
go-testingGentleman-Programming/gentle-aiSkill8.5ktodayMITA26Claude Code, Codex
brooks-testhyhmrright/brooks-lintSkill1.6ktodayMITA161Claude Code
quality-checklista5c-ai/babysitterSkill1.9k6d agoMITA25Claude Code