Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add greynewell/mcpbr --skill mcpbr-evalgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/greynewell/mcpbrWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/greynewell/mcpbr/mcpbr-eval)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/greynewell/mcpbr/mcpbr-eval"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/greynewell/mcpbr/mcpbr-eval.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.01317 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00659 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00263 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00132 |
Grade A, and why
run-benchmark scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 124 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Instructions
You are an expert at benchmarking AI agents using the mcpbr CLI. Your goal is to run valid, reproducible evaluations.
Critical Constraints (DO NOT IGNORE)
-
Docker is Mandatory: Before running ANY
mcpbrcommand, you MUST verify Docker is running (docker ps). If not, tell the user to start it. -
Config is Required:
mcpbr runFAILS without a config file. Never guess flags.- IF no config exists: Run
mcpbr initfirst to generate a template. - IF config exists: Read it (
cat mcpbr.yamlor the specified config path) to verify themcp_servercommand is valid for the user's environment (e.g., check ifnpxoruvxis installed).
- IF no config exists: Run
-
Workdir Placeholder: When generating configs, ensure
argsincludes"{workdir}". Do not resolve this path yourself;mcpbrhandles it. -
API Key Required: The
ANTHROPIC_API_KEYenvironment variable must be set. Check for it before running evaluations.
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- DO NOT use the
-mflag unless the user explicitly asks to override the model in the YAML. - DO NOT hallucinate dataset names. Valid datasets include:
SWE-bench/SWE-bench_Lite(default for SWE-bench)SWE-bench/SWE-bench_Verifiedsunblaze-ucb/cybergym(for CyberGym benchmark)MCPToolBench/MCPToolBenchPP(for MCPToolBench++)
- DO NOT hallucinate flags or options. Only use documented CLI flags.
- DO NOT forget to specify the config file with
-cor--config.
Supported Benchmarks
mcpbr supports three benchmarks:
-
SWE-bench (default): Real GitHub issues requiring bug fixes
- Dataset:
SWE-bench/SWE-bench_LiteorSWE-bench/SWE-bench_Verified - Use:
mcpbr run -c config.yamlor--benchmark swe-bench
- Dataset:
-
CyberGym: Security vulnerabilities requiring PoC exploits
- Dataset:
sunblaze-ucb/cybergym - Use:
mcpbr run -c config.yaml --benchmark cybergym --level [0-3]
- Dataset:
-
MCPToolBench++: Large-scale tool use evaluation
- Dataset:
MCPToolBench/MCPToolBenchPP - Use:
mcpbr run -c config.yaml --benchmark mcptoolbench
- Dataset:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 124 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 4d0b1126fcef
run-benchmark is a skill published in the GitHub repository greynewell/mcpbr (10 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 1,317 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
api-testing
Testing patterns for MCP tool/resource handlers using createMockContext and Vitest. Covers mock context options, handler testing, McpError assertions, format testing, Vitest config setup, and test isolation conventions.
add-test
Scaffold a test file for an existing tool, resource, or service. Use when the user asks to add tests, improve coverage, or when a definition exists without a matching test file.
Home Security AI Benchmark
LLM & VLM evaluation suite for home security AI applications.
SmartHome Video Anomaly Benchmark
VLM evaluation suite for video anomaly detection in smart home camera footage.
email-formatting
Markdown formatting conventions for email summary documents — heading depth, list style, line length, emoji policy, and a mandatory provenance footer. Read this when producing a markdown report that summarizes one or more email messages so the output matches the project's house style.
json-schema-emails
Canonical shape of the .workflow/emails/emails.json file passed between the fetch and summarize states — required fields (sender, recipient, subject, date, body), types, and field semantics. Read this whenever you write or read emails.json so producer and consumer agree on the shape.