Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/griddynamics/rosetta/init-workspace-documentationnpx skills add griddynamics/rosetta --skill init-workspace-documentationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/griddynamics/rosettaWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00010 | $0.01245 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00622 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00249 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00125 |
Grade A, and why
init-workspace-documentation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 143 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<init_workspace_documentation>
<when_to_use_skill> Workspaces lack structured documentation, forcing every session to re-discover facts and repeat mistakes. This skill creates five foundational docs from source code analysis. Proof: all five docs exist, are non-empty, complementary, and track unknowns. </when_to_use_skill>
<core_concepts>
- All Rosetta prep steps MUST be FULLY completed, load-context skill loaded and fully executed
- ACQUIRE
reverse-engineering/SKILL.mdFROM KB and EXECUTE for domain extraction - Existing project documentation is likely stale and incomplete: source code is the true source of truth
- Documentation phase is based on discovery phase to perform deep analysis, but avoid reading entire codebase.
- Select which files to read, group organize by modules/batches/groups and must assign to subagents to execute.
</core_concepts>
- Dual-mode based on state.mode:
- Scan for each target doc file
- Compare existing content against codebase findings
- install = create all; upgrade = update gaps only
- Never overwrite human-added content; merge alongside
- Report created/updated/skipped files
- Analyze project structure and key source files
- Create TODO task per document with business context angle
- Track unknowns in ASSUMPTIONS.md with forward references
- Create or update documents:
CONTEXT.md:
- What this doc is for and what it should contain, self-defining style
- Self-defines purpose, content type, style
- Bulleted business context, purpose, domain — stakeholder perspective
- No technical details
ARCHITECTURE.md:
- What this doc is for and what it should contain, self-defining style
- Self-defines purpose, content type, style
- Architecture, modules, workspace structure, testing, styling, building blocks
- No business context — reference CONTEXT.md
- Reference CODEMAP.md for file structure
IMPLEMENTATION.md:
- What this doc is for and what it should contain, self-defining style
- Self-defines purpose, content type, style
- Baseline state VERY BRIEFLY (first part, use word "Baseline" in header, not word "current" - misleading later on)
- High-level change log, each change separate header with date and description (second part)
- DRY — reference other docs
- The only implementation change log
- If nothing to add - add template
ASSUMPTIONS.md:
- What this doc is for and what it should contain, self-defining style
- Self-defines purpose, content type, style
- Each entry: assumption, confidence level, target file when resolved
- Revalidate all assumptions after other documents complete
- If nothing to add - add template
TODO.md:
- What this doc is for and what it should contain, self-defining style
- Self-defines purpose, content type, style
- Each entry comes with header containing "priority when what where" and body with details
- If nothing to add - add template
AGENT MEMORY.md:
- What this doc is for and what it should contain, self-defining style
- Self-defines purpose, content type, style
- Must follow the template exactly - it will be updated during use
- Keep template entries so that AI knows how to fill them in later on
- It is for agent operational notes, not a duplicate of CONTEXT.md/ARCHITECTURE.md
README.md:
- Create in workspace and in each repository root README.md files if missing
- Special cases:
- Speckit: if
memory/constitution.mdandspecsfolder exist, add "MUST ACQUIRE speckit-integration-policy.md FROM KB and execute it" to CONTEXT.md - Composite (state.composite = true): create top-level docs as registries with workspace-relative paths to sub-repo docs
- If large project add "MUST USE SKILL
large-workspace-handling" to CONTEXT.md
- Speckit: if
<validation_checklist>
- Each document contains self-definition of purpose and style
- Documents complement without repeating each other
- ASSUMPTIONS.md entries have forward references to target documents
- Upgrade mode: human content preserved, only gaps filled
- Files can be grepped by headers for useful information and ToC </validation_checklist>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 143 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A ea15dc13930f
init-workspace-documentation is a skill published in the GitHub repository griddynamics/rosetta (341 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 1,245 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
Architecture Explainer
Reads a codebase or system description and produces a clear, structured architecture overview with diagrams.
explain-codebase
Drop into any repo and generate a structured architecture overview. Maps the codebase, identifies entry points, frameworks, and dependencies — then produces a "start here" guide for new contributors.
repository-discovery
Use this skill to systematically explore an unfamiliar codebase before making any changes. Activates when starting work in an unknown repository, adding a new feature, debugging without prior context, or when no CONTEXT.md exists. Produces a grounded understanding of architecture, conventions, and constraints.
macos-test-triage
Triage macOS tests across Xcode and SwiftPM. Use when narrowing failures, explaining assertions or crashes, or separating setup from regressions.
fix-codesign-error
Slash command that inspects a macOS signing or entitlement failure and explains the minimum fix path. Invoke explicitly with /fix-codesign-error — this skill never self-triggers.
macos-swiftpm
Build, run, and test SwiftPM macOS packages and executables. Use when the repo is package-first or has no Xcode project.