Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/griffinwork40/agent-afk/specnpx skills add griffinwork40/agent-afk --skill specgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/griffinwork40/agent-afkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/griffinwork40/agent-afk/spec)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/griffinwork40/agent-afk/spec"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/griffinwork40/agent-afk/spec.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00472 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00236 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00094 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
spec scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- spec — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
What it actually says
Triage: bugs route to /diagnose
Before speccing, detect bug-shaped inputs: crashes, error stacks, regression reports ("worked yesterday", "used to work"), platform-specific failures ("broken on X", "doesn't work when…"), or user-report framing that implies root-cause-first (not design-first). If detected, stop and redirect: "This is a debugging task, not a spec task. Route to /diagnose instead — it will isolate the root cause, then /spec can scope the fix." Do not emit a spec.
Dispatch two sub-agents in parallel. One researches the web for prior art, comparable approaches, and patterns relevant to $ARGUMENT. The other inspects the local working directory for conventions, existing artifacts, and integration points relevant to the domain. When both return, synthesize a concise spec using the domain-appropriate schema below. Present to the user for confirmation before proceeding.
Output schema by domain:
| Domain | Spec fields |
|---|---|
software |
problem, goals, non-goals, approach, key decisions, interface, file plan, test plan, open questions |
research |
problem, hypothesis, methodology, prior art positioning, expected results, publication plan, open questions |
design |
problem, user needs, constraints, solution space, prototype plan, success metrics, open questions |
business |
opportunity, risk analysis, competitive landscape, go/no-go criteria, resource plan, open questions |
| (other) | problem, goals, non-goals, approach, key decisions, deliverables, validation plan, open questions |
When domain is unspecified, infer from $ARGUMENT and the working directory. If ambiguous, use the generic (other) schema.
Epistemic confidence
Include an Epistemic confidence section at the end of every spec: summarize coverage gaps from research, flag claims that will be hard to verify, and note where human judgment will be needed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 31 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 167e7cbb84de
spec is a skill published in the GitHub repository griffinwork40/agent-afk (54 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 472 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
mcp-builder
Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).
subagent-driven-development
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session.
comet-hotfix
Comet 预设 —— 通过 open-build-verify-archive 短流程修复已有行为 bug。.
comet-verify
Comet Phase 4: Verify and Close. Invoke with /comet-verify. Verify implementation matches design, handle development branch.
comet-design
Comet Classic 阶段 2 —— 为 change 产出深度技术 Design Doc。.
comet-hotfix
Comet preset path: Bug fix / hotfix. Skip brainstorming, directly open → build → verify → archive. Applicable for behavior fixes, scenarios not involving new capability design.