comet-verify

comet-verify is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from rpamis/comet. It costs 32 tokens per session (3,101 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A final verification workflow for a completed coding change, including checks against the project tasks and handling the development branch.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after coding tasks are complete and changes have been committed. It runs entry checks, assesses the change’s scale, verifies the implementation, and closes the workflow when all checks pass.
Why use it?
It catches unfinished work or implementation problems before the change is closed. It also records whether verification passed and whether the branch has been handled.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it after coding tasks are complete and changes have been committed. It runs entry checks, assesses the change’s scale, verifies the implementation, and closes the workflow when all checks pass.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/rpamis/comet/comet-classic-039-verify
About the project

Comet is a resumable workflow and skill platform for coding tasks, covering requirements work as well as skill creation, evaluation, and release. It supports separate Native and Classic workflows and can coordinate implementation and verification across isolated Git worktrees. The catalogue contains skills and instructions that implement Comet-related workflows.

rpamis/comet · 2,988 stars · on GitHub · docs.comet.rpamis.com

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add rpamis/comet --skill comet-classic-039-verify
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rpamis/comet

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for comet-verify

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rpamis/comet/comet-classic-039-verify/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rpamis/comet/comet-classic-039-verify)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rpamis/comet/comet-classic-039-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rpamis/comet/comet-classic-039-verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for comet-verify

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rpamis/comet/comet-classic-039-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rpamis/comet/comet-classic-039-verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 32 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,101 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium Excessive Agency · line 80
    Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
    Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00032 $0.03101
Opus 5 $0.00016 $0.01550
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00620
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00310

Measured 10d ago against content hash 506d52a77a6f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

comet-verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

eval/local/skills/benchmarks/039-release/comet-classic-039-verify/SKILL.md · 235 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 235 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Comet Phase 4: Verify and Close (Verify)

Prerequisites

  • Code committed (Phase 3 complete)
  • All tasks.md tasks completed

Steps

0a. Output Language Constraint

Verification reports and branch-handling notes must use the language of the user request that triggered this workflow.

0b. Entry State Verification (Entry Check)

Execute entry verification:

COMET_ENV="${COMET_ENV:-$(find . "$HOME"/.*/skills "$HOME/.config" "$HOME/.gemini" -path '*/comet/scripts/comet-env.sh' -type f -print -quit 2>/dev/null)}"
if [ -z "$COMET_ENV" ]; then
  echo "ERROR: comet-env.sh not found. Ensure the comet skill is installed." >&2
  return 1
fi
. "$COMET_ENV"
"$COMET_BASH" "$COMET_STATE" check <change-name> verify

Proceed to Step 1 after verification passes. The script outputs specific failure reasons when verification fails.

Idempotency: All verify phase checks can be safely re-executed. If verify_result is already pass and branch_status is handled, verification is complete — execute guard to transition. If verify_result is pending, start verification from the beginning.

1. Scale Assessment

Execute scale assessment:

"$COMET_BASH" "$COMET_STATE" scale <change-name>

The script automatically counts tasks, delta spec count, changed file count, determines light or full verification mode, and sets the verify_mode field. Decision rule (any condition triggers full): tasks > 3, delta spec capabilities > 1, changed files > 4.

Before verification begins, handle uncommitted changes through comet/reference/dirty-worktree.md protocol. Verify phase special handling:

  1. If dirty diff belongs to current change and involves implementation, tests, tasks, delta spec, or design doc changes, do not fix or commit directly in verify phase; report failures and enter Step 1b verification failure decision blocking point
  2. If dirty diff is only verify phase artifacts (e.g., verification report draft, branch handling records), may continue and record state in verify phase
  3. If dirty diff shows implementation but tasks.md not checked, treat as build state lag; report failures and enter Step 1b, let user decide to roll back for fix or accept deviation

Read the full file on GitHub · 235 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 235 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 506d52a77a6f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

comet-verify is a skill published in the GitHub repository rpamis/comet (2,988 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 3,101 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

load-pr-review

Load GitHub PR review comments into AI session — analyze, triage, plan. Default: analysis-only (no auto-fix). Use when: reviewing PR feedback, planning fixes, addressing review comments, replying to reviewers. Not for: creating reviews (use codex-review-fast), creating PRs (use create-pr), viewing PR status (use…

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 77 tokens

issue-analyze

GitHub Issue and PR review thread deep analysis with Codex blind verdict. Use when: analyzing issue root cause, classifying problems, investigation planning, triaging PR review comments for actionability. Not for: fixing bugs (use bug-fix), code exploration (use code-explore). Output: classified analysis + verdict…

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 73 tokens

best-practices

Industry best practices conformance audit with mandatory adversarial debate. Produces audit artifact: verdict (OK/WARN/FAIL) + gap roadmap + debate proof. Use when: auditing current implementation against industry standards, checking compliance with best practices, benchmarking implementation quality, verifying a…

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 101 tokens

refactor

Multi-target refactoring orchestrator. Use when: cleaning up messy code/docs, simplifying code, restructuring documents, batch cleanup. Not for: new features (use feature-dev), bug fixes (use bug-fix), code understanding (use code-explore). Output: refactored code/docs + review gate.

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 65 tokens

pre-pr-audit

Pre-PR confidence audit with 5-dimension scoring. Use when: final check before commit/push/PR, evaluating PR readiness, assessing test quality + risk + coverage holistically. Triggers: pre-pr, readiness check, confidence audit, final verification, ready to PR, how confident. Not for: code review (use…

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 95 tokens

review-spec

Review technical spec documents from completeness, feasibility, risk, and code consistency perspectives.

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 19 tokens