Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add growthenginenowoslawski/coldoutboundskills --skill icp-prompt-buildergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/growthenginenowoslawski/coldoutboundskillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/growthenginenowoslawski/coldoutboundskills/icp-prompt-builder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/growthenginenowoslawski/coldoutboundskills/icp-prompt-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/growthenginenowoslawski/coldoutboundskills/icp-prompt-builder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/growthenginenowoslawski/coldoutboundskills/icp-prompt-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/growthenginenowoslawski/coldoutboundskills/icp-prompt-builder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 134 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium Excessive Agency · line 142 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00101 | $0.02174 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00051 | $0.01087 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00435 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00217 |
Grade A, and why
icp-prompt-builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- icp-prompt-builder — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 206 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ICP Prompt Builder
Before you pay to pull 5,000 companies, tune a qualification prompt on 10-50 of them. This skill walks you through the iterative loop.
Why this exists
List-builder skills (DiscoLike, Blitz, Prospeo, Google Maps) return COMPANIES, but they don't know whether those companies match your ICP. If your list-builder returns 5,000 companies and 80% are wrong fits, you'll waste money enriching them for emails that go nowhere.
The fix: build an AI qualification prompt BEFORE scaling. Pull 10 companies, have the prompt score them, compare to your judgment, refine, repeat. Once the prompt agrees with you 2 rounds in a row with zero corrections, lock it in and apply it at scale.
Always uses Task sub-agents (no API key)
This skill runs entirely inside Claude Code via the Task tool. No Anthropic SDK calls, no OpenAI calls — Claude Code does the scoring itself. This is intentional:
- No extra API spend. Uses your Claude Code plan.
- No key management. Works out of the box.
- Scaleable within reason. For 20-100 evaluations, parallel Task sub-agents batch 10-20 companies per agent.
At very large scale (5,000+ companies per batch), you may want to export the tuned prompt and run it through the OpenAI / Anthropic API with parallelism for speed. But TUNING happens inside Claude Code.
The loop (8 steps)
Step 1 — Gather ICP context
Claude asks the user (or reads client-profile.yaml from /icp-onboarding):
- Website of the client selling (to scrape for context)
- Who IS a good customer? What makes them a good fit?
- Who is NOT a good customer? What disqualifies them?
- Any specific signals? (B2B only, revenue range, tech stack, hiring status, recent fundraise, etc.)
- Any HARD disqualifiers? (competitor domains, existing customer domains, certain industries/geographies)
Step 2 — Select 10 test companies
Pull 10 companies from the list-builder output:
- Mix likely-good and likely-bad fits
- Variety in industry, size, location
- Each company needs at minimum:
domain, company_name, industry, headcount, description - Richer fields (Clay-derived: Business Type, Scale Scope, Revenue) make scoring better
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 206 lines · 101 tokens per session scan A eaec0306b7a2
icp-prompt-builder is a skill published in the GitHub repository growthenginenowoslawski/coldoutboundskills (702 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 101 tokens to every session and 2,174 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
llm-app-patterns
Production-ready patterns for building LLM applications. Covers RAG pipelines, agent architectures, prompt IDEs, and LLMOps monitoring. Use when designing AI applications, implementing RAG, building agents, or setting up LLM observability.
prompt-optimization
Improve a prompt on the evaluations workbench through a measured loop. Score the baseline first, then duplicate the target column, form a hypothesis from failing rows, edit the copy's prompt draft, run, compare pass rate and cost, and repeat until the numbers hold. Use when the user asks to optimize or improve a…
enhance-prompt
Transforms vague UI ideas into polished, Stitch-optimized prompts. Enhances specificity, adds UI/UX keywords, injects design system context, and structures output for better generation results.
prompt-engineer
Writes, refactors, and evaluates prompts for LLMs — generating optimized prompt templates, structured output schemas, evaluation rubrics, and test suites. Use when designing prompts for new LLM applications, refactoring existing prompts for better accuracy or token efficiency, implementing chain-of-thought or few-shot…
seedance-vocab-en
This skill should be used when an English Seedance 2.0 prompt needs clearer production wording, less generic prose, or precise vocabulary for camera, lighting, motion, VFX, audio, and constraints. Route blocked prompts through seedance-filter for context and boundary review.
ideogram4
Prompting patterns for Ideogram 4 text-to-image — best-in-class in-image text rendering and exact color/layout control via structured JSON captions. Use when generating images that need legible on-image text (title cards, thumbnails, logos, signage, CTAs), precise brand colors, or controlled spatial layout. Triggers…