Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add GSA-TTS/mcp-hackathon-template --skill mcp-evalgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GSA-TTS/mcp-hackathon-templateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gsa-tts/mcp-hackathon-template/mcp-eval)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gsa-tts/mcp-hackathon-template/mcp-eval"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gsa-tts/mcp-hackathon-template/mcp-eval.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00076 | $0.02998 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00038 | $0.01499 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00600 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00300 |
Grade A, and why
mcp-eval scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 277 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
MCP Server Evaluation Guide (Phoenix)
Overview
The measure of an MCP server's quality is NOT how comprehensively it implements tools, but how well those tools (schemas, docstrings, return shapes) let an LLM with NO other context answer realistic, difficult questions. This skill describes a reusable Arize Phoenix evaluation harness that:
- Spins up a LangChain agent connected to the MCP server (over stdio).
- Feeds it a dataset of natural-language questions with known answers.
- Scores each answer with LLM-as-judge evaluators and logs traces to Phoenix.
Use this after the server is built (it complements the mcp-builder skill, which
produces the evaluation.xml question set this harness consumes).
Module Layout
The harness lives in eval/phoenix/ at the repo root:
eval/phoenix/
├── agent.py # The <Server>Agent class (launches the MCP server over stdio)
├── create_dataset.py # CLI: upload a CSV dataset to Phoenix
├── run_experiment.py # CLI: run an experiment (agent + judges) against a dataset
├── datasets.yaml # Dataset registry (name -> csv_path, input/output keys, description)
├── README.md # Usage docs for this specific server
├── judges/ # LLM-as-judge evaluators
│ ├── __init__.py # Re-exports each judge for `from judges import ...`
│ ├── correctness_judge.py # match_expected_response (compares to ground truth)
│ └── relevance_judge.py # check_answer_scope (in-scope vs. out-of-scope)
├── prompts/ # Agent system prompts, one per version
│ ├── system_prompt_v1.txt # Basic domain analyst
│ └── system_prompt_v2.txt # + scope boundaries
└── datasets/ # Test datasets (CSV files)
└── <name>/examples/<name>.csv
Naming: Name the agent class after the server (e.g. HydroAgent, NIHReporterAgent)
and name datasets <domain>-eval-<n> (e.g. hydro-eval-0).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 277 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A f6960f39170f
mcp-eval is a skill published in the GitHub repository GSA-TTS/mcp-hackathon-template (0 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 2,998 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.