Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add gtapps/hermitd/plugin install hermitd-laravel-forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtapps/hermitd/forge-failed-deploys)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtapps/hermitd/forge-failed-deploys"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gtapps/hermitd/forge-failed-deploys/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtapps/hermitd/forge-failed-deploys"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gtapps/hermitd/forge-failed-deploys.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00738 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00295 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00148 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
forge-failed-deploys scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- forge-failed-deploys — 86% identical, 8 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 53 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Forge Failed Deploys
Routine skill: scans the org-wide site list and flags any sites whose latest deployment status is failed, failed-build, or cancelled.
Contract: idempotent, read-only, no self-scheduling, short-running. Returns findings or silence — never creates proposals itself.
Steps
-
Run the estate scan.
php ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/php/forge.php failed-deploys --jsonThis pages through the org-wide site list via
organizationSites()->lazy()and fetches thedeployment_statusfield on each site. For sites in a failure state it fetches the latestdeployments()detail. Rate limiting (429) is handled internally with conservative pacing. -
Parse the JSON output. Each entry has:
site_id,site_name,server_id,status, optionallydeploy_id,deploy_status,commit. An entry whose detail fetch was rate-limited instead carries anerrorkey (and nodeploy_id/commit) — treat those as "failure, detail unavailable" and omit the commit line. Never assume all keys are present. -
Output the findings block. Always output to stdout, regardless of outcome.
reflect --check-id forge-failed-deploys --check hermitd-laravel-forge:forge-failed-deploysclassifies the result.Failures found:
forge-failed-deploys findings — <YYYY-MM-DD> Failed deployments: <N> - [deploy-failure] <site_name> (server: <server_id>): status <status><commit line if available>One bullet per failed site.
No failures:
forge-failed-deploys findings — <YYYY-MM-DD> No actionable findings. -
Do not fetch deployment logs. This scan surfaces sites with failures; the
forge-logsorforge-deployskills handle remediation. Fetching logs per failure during the scan would hit rate limits on large estates.
Notes
- This skill writes no artifact. Findings are returned for
reflect --check-id forge-failed-deploys --check hermitd-laravel-forge:forge-failed-deploysto classify and route. Routine execution owns scheduling state. - Registered by
/hermitd-laravel-forge:hatchas theforge-failed-deploysroutine. Its schedule lives inconfig.routines. - No channel notifications — this is analysis-only. Findings surface as
[reliability]proposals via the normal pipeline. - scope: if
organizationSites()does not carrydeployment_statusin your Forge plan/API version, the scan will report zero findings (not an error). Scope towatched_sitesin.hermit/config.jsonif org-wide scan is unavailable. - Rate limit: Forge allows ~60 req/min. The scan paces conservatively; if a 429 is returned mid-scan it waits 30 seconds and the scan exits with an error — the check will retry on the next scheduled run.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 53 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A c2693a17719c
forge-failed-deploys is a skill published in the GitHub repository gtapps/hermitd (79 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 738 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-02.
Other skills, from other repositories
relay-deploy
Set up a complete deployment configuration — Dockerfile, deployment manifest, environment config, and rollback procedure. Use when asked about "deployment setup", "how do I deploy this", "deployment strategy", or "rollback plan".
forge-cost
Audit cloud infrastructure costs and produce a concrete optimization plan with specific changes and estimated savings. Use when asked to "how much is this costing", "reduce cloud spend", "cost optimization", "are we overpaying", "cloud bill", or "budget for this infra".
forge-infra
Build production-grade infrastructure as code for a service or project. Use when asked to "set up infra", "provision infrastructure", "create cloud resources", "IaC for this project", "terraform for this", or "deploy this service".
forge-recon
Infrastructure reconnaissance — inventory all cloud resources, map connections, flag risks. Use when asked to "inventory our infra", "what infrastructure do we have", "map our cloud resources", "infra discovery", or "what's running in our cloud".
flux-recon
Database reconnaissance — full inventory of schema, migrations, data volume, backups, connection pooling, and query patterns. Use when asked to "assess this database", "understand the schema", or "database health check".
forge-audit
Audit existing infrastructure for security issues, waste, and misconfigurations. Use when asked to "audit my infra", "check cloud setup", "infra review", "are we wasting money", "security check on infra", or "review my terraform".