weekly-load-review

weekly-load-review is a skill for Claude Code from gtapps/hermitd. It costs 18 tokens per session (1,258 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A weekly training report that compares the current and previous week's Strava activities with a four-week rolling baseline. Strava is a service that records exercise activities such as running, cycling, and strength training.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review weekly training load across running, cycling, and strength work, provided the Strava connection is available.
Why use it?
It puts recent training volume in context instead of looking at one week alone, helping reveal changes in distance, elevation, sessions, and strength duration.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the hermitd-fitness plugin — 7 skills, 1 agent shipped together

Good fit Use it to review weekly training load across running, cycling, and strength work, provided the Strava connection is available.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/gtapps/hermitd/weekly-load-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add gtapps/hermitd --skill weekly-load-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gtapps/hermitd

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install hermitd-fitness, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 7 skills, 1 agent.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for weekly-load-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gtapps/hermitd/weekly-load-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtapps/hermitd/weekly-load-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtapps/hermitd/weekly-load-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gtapps/hermitd/weekly-load-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for weekly-load-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtapps/hermitd/weekly-load-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gtapps/hermitd/weekly-load-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 18 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,258 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00018 $0.01258
Opus 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00503
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00004 $0.00252
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00126

Measured 11d ago against content hash d6183920b443, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

weekly-load-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/hermitd-fitness/skills/weekly-load-review/SKILL.md · 69 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Weekly Training Load Review

Goal

Pull the last 14 days of Strava activities and compute weekly training load summaries for this week (Mon–Sun) and the prior week (Mon–Sun). Compare against the 4-week rolling baseline stored in state/strava-weekly-baselines.json (create if missing).

Steps

  1. Call mcp__strava__check-strava-connection. If disconnected, alert the operator via the configured channel and stop. If no channel is configured, pipe the disconnection into .hermit/bin/hermitd-run task note .hermit <id> only inside an open record's turn (otherwise skip the note) and stop.
  2. Call mcp__strava__get-recent-activities with perPage: 30 to cover 14+ days.
  3. Determine the two week boundaries: this week is the most recent Mon–Sun period ending today (Sunday); the prior week is the Mon–Sun before that. Compute the exact date ranges from today's date.
  4. For each week compute:
    • Run: total distance (km), total elevation (m), session count
    • Bike: total distance (km), session count
    • Strength: session count, total duration in minutes as strength_minutes (sum moving_time over WeightTraining/Workout activities: already in the Step 2 payload, no extra call; moving_time is in seconds, so divide the sum by 60)
    • Total active days Also compute load-adjusted run distance (adjusted_km): for each run activity, derive elev_gain_per_km = elevation_gain_m / distance_km and apply a heuristic multiplier to account for the higher mechanical load of gradient (descents especially): < 10 m/km → 1.0× · 10 to < 25 m/km → 1.2× · 25 to < 40 m/km → 1.35× · ≥ 40 m/km → 1.5×. Sum the adjusted distances to get the week's adjusted_km.
  5. Read state/strava-weekly-baselines.json and state/activity-notes.json (or {} if absent) in the same turn. The baselines file is used in step 6; the activity notes will be used in step 8.
  6. Compare this week's adjusted_km to the 4-week rolling average of adjusted_km from the baseline file. If any historical week lacks adjusted_km, use that week's raw km as its adjusted value for the rolling average.
    • 25% above average → 🔴 "Load spike: [Y]km (adj) vs [avg]km average"

    • 25% below average → 🟡 "Load dip: [Y]km (adj) vs [avg]km average"

    • Within range → 🟢 "Consistent load"
  7. Update state/strava-weekly-baselines.json: append this week's totals, including adjusted_km alongside the existing raw km, and strength_minutes. Keep only the last 8 weeks.
  8. From the activity list fetched in step 2, collect the IDs of this week's activities. Filter the activity-notes.json read in step 5 to those IDs. If 2 or more RPE entries exist, compute the average (one decimal place) and prepare the line: 💬 Avg RPE: X.X/10 (N=<count>). Otherwise prepare no RPE line.

Read the full file on GitHub · 69 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 69 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A d6183920b443

Subscribe to this mod's changes

weekly-load-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository gtapps/hermitd (79 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 1,258 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-02.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

reinforcement-learning

Reinforcement Learning best practices for Python using modern libraries (Stable-Baselines3, RLlib, Gymnasium). Use when: Implementing RL algorithms (PPO, SAC, DQN, TD3, A2C) Creating custom Gymnasium environments Training, debugging, or evaluating RL agents Setting up hyperparameter tuning for RL Deploying RL models…

Aznatkoiny/zAI-Skills · 86 tokens

cpp-reinforcement-learning

C++ Reinforcement Learning best practices using libtorch (PyTorch C++ frontend) and modern C++17/20. Use when: Implementing RL algorithms in C++ for performance-critical applications Building production RL systems with libtorch Creating replay buffers and experience storage Optimizing RL training with GPU acceleration…

Aznatkoiny/zAI-Skills · 83 tokens

research-poster

Turns a PDF abstract into a polished, fully-editable scientific conference poster (.pptx + PDF + preview) in a matched house style, with honest charts, verified citations, big readable typography, and a render-and-QA loop. Use whenever the user wants to make, build, design, or create a research poster, scientific…

adamjali/research-poster-skill · 198 tokens

open-problem

Use when the user points at a hard, unsolved, or open problem in any field — mathematics, physics, biology, ML, engineering — and wants a real attack on it. Runs a sustained multi-agent assault: establishes the state of play from primary sources, hunts for the two literatures nobody has combined, generates and kills…

infiniV/ultra-ml-intern · 141 tokens

especialista-em-informacao-em-saude

Especialista em Informação em Saúde. Use para dados clínicos e administrativos, sistemas de informação, qualidade do dado e inteligência de gestão em saúde. Palavras-chave: informação em saúde, dados clínicos, dados administrativos, DATASUS, sistemas de informação, inteligência de gestão.

euwebertdefreitas/ai-skills-for-claude-code · 66 tokens

especialista-em-gestao-de-saude

Especialista em Gestão de Saúde. Use para gestão de saúde e serviços assistenciais: indicadores de saúde, qualidade assistencial, regulação, saúde populacional e conformidade. Palavras-chave: gestão de saúde, assistencial, indicadores, qualidade, regulação, saúde populacional, LGPD/HIPAA.

euwebertdefreitas/ai-skills-for-claude-code · 73 tokens