gtm-strategist-skills: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/validating-customers/SKILL.md

validating-customers is a skill for Claude Code from GTM-Strategist/gtm-strategist-skills. It costs 75 tokens per session (4,430 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A research-led process for testing who a product is really for and whether its customer assumptions are correct. An ICP, or ideal customer profile, is a hypothesis about the best-fit customer group.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to map assumptions, design minimum viable idea tests, run alpha tests, launch in communities, and build customer archetypes from evidence.
Why use it?
It replaces invented customer personas with evidence from interviews and real experiments, helping expose which problems and audiences are genuine.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

This is GTM-Strategist/gtm-strategist-skills's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on gtm-strategist-skills itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything gtm-strategist-skills configures →

Part of the .claude plugin — 12 skills shipped together

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to GTM-Strategist/gtm-strategist-skills. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GTM-Strategist/gtm-strategist-skills/master/.claude/skills/validating-customers/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GTM-Strategist/gtm-strategist-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install .claude, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 12 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for validating-customers

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gtm-strategist/gtm-strategist-skills/validating-customers/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtm-strategist/gtm-strategist-skills/validating-customers)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtm-strategist/gtm-strategist-skills/validating-customers"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gtm-strategist/gtm-strategist-skills/validating-customers/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for validating-customers

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gtm-strategist/gtm-strategist-skills/validating-customers"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gtm-strategist/gtm-strategist-skills/validating-customers.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 75 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,430 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00075 $0.04430
Opus 5 $0.00037 $0.02215
Sonnet 5 $0.00015 $0.00886
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00443

Measured 12d ago against content hash 027ad6b1f276, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

validating-customers scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/validating-customers/SKILL.md · 426 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 426 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Phase 3: Validating Customers

You are executing Phase 3 of the GTM Strategist methodology. This phase is about finding your persona empirically — not making things up. Everything at this stage is still an assumption until validated through real experiments with real people.

Philosophy: You don't "define" your customer — you discover them. Brainstormed personas are fiction. Validated archetypes are strategy.


Before You Start

  1. Read my-gtm-context.md — load the user's product, market, ICP hypothesis, and traction context. If Section 3 (ICP) or Section 4 (Problem & Value) are empty, ask the user to fill those in first or complete Phase 1.

  2. Check for prior phase outputs:

    • outputs/01-* — Phase 1 (GTM Foundations): OPE canvas, value prop, 90-day plan
    • outputs/02-* — Phase 2 (Collecting Intelligence): beachhead segments, interview insights, competitor analysis
    • If Phase 2 outputs exist, reference interview findings and beachhead segments heavily — they are the raw material for validation.
    • If Phase 2 outputs are missing, warn the user: "Phase 3 works best when you have interview data from Phase 2. You can proceed, but your assumption map will rely more on hypothesis than evidence. Consider completing collecting-intelligence first."
  3. Check outputs/03-* for any existing Phase 3 work so you build on it rather than restart.


Tasks

Work through these one at a time. Present each deliverable, get feedback, then proceed to the next.


Task 1: Map Assumptions & Plan Experiments

Duration: 1-3 hours | Output: outputs/03-assumption-map.md

Everything you believe about your customer, problem, and solution is an assumption until tested. This task makes those assumptions explicit and prioritizes which to test first.

Assumption Mapping Framework:

Guide the user through these steps:

  1. List all assumptions across four categories:
    • Customer: Who they are, where they are, what they care about
    • Problem: Severity, frequency, current workarounds, willingness to change
    • Solution: Whether your approach solves it, usability, feature priority
    • Business: Willingness to pay, price sensitivity, acquisition channels

Read the full file on GitHub · 426 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 426 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A 027ad6b1f276

Subscribe to this mod's changes

validating-customers is a skill published in the GitHub repository GTM-Strategist/gtm-strategist-skills (254 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 4,430 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

insight-error-page

Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…

vercel/next.js · 83 tokens