theory-sharpen

theory-sharpen is a skill for Claude Code from gyf9712/stat-theory-skills. It costs 105 tokens per session (10,976 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A framework for testing whether a research paper’s theoretical results can be made stronger, such as by using fewer assumptions or proving faster rates. It also checks whether the theory matches the model, experiments, and existing research.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to assess assumptions, compare results with current literature, improve mathematical rates, and align theoretical claims with experiments.
Why use it?
It helps researchers see improvement opportunities beyond simply checking whether a proof is correct.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions subagents; mentions Codex.

Good fit Use it to assess assumptions, compare results with current literature, improve mathematical rates, and align theoretical claims with experiments.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/gyf9712/stat-theory-skills/theory-sharpen
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add gyf9712/stat-theory-skills --skill theory-sharpen
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gyf9712/stat-theory-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for theory-sharpen

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gyf9712/stat-theory-skills/theory-sharpen/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gyf9712/stat-theory-skills/theory-sharpen)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gyf9712/stat-theory-skills/theory-sharpen"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gyf9712/stat-theory-skills/theory-sharpen/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for theory-sharpen

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gyf9712/stat-theory-skills/theory-sharpen"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gyf9712/stat-theory-skills/theory-sharpen.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 105 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 10,976 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00105 $0.10976
Opus 5 $0.00053 $0.05488
Sonnet 5 $0.00021 $0.02195
Haiku 4.5 $0.00011 $0.01098

Measured 12d ago against content hash 1da0622a4fd3, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

theory-sharpen scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/theory-sharpen/SKILL.md · 884 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 884 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Theory-Sharpen — Systematic Theoretical Improvement Assessment

🔬 Model Recommendation: Run this skill on Claude Opus for best results. Framework classification, assumption-relaxation analysis, and rate-sharpening all require deep mathematical reasoning. If your session is not on Opus, run /model opus before invoking. Literature search and Codex cross-review will use Opus sub-agents.

Go beyond "is the proof correct?" to ask "can the theory be stronger, sharper, and better aligned with the model, the literature, and the experiments?"

Pipeline position:

/proofcheck → /proof-repair → /theory-sharpen → /proof-writer
  Correct?      Fix issues       Improve theory     Write new proofs

This skill can also run standalone on any paper with theoretical results.

Context: $ARGUMENTS


Core Philosophy

A good theory paper is evaluated on three axes:

  1. Strength: Are assumptions as weak as possible? Are rates as sharp as possible?
  2. Alignment: Does the theory match what the model actually provides and what the experiments actually test?
  3. Positioning: How does the result compare to the best known results in the literature?

This skill systematically audits all three axes and produces an actionable improvement roadmap.


Step 0: Ingest & Map the Theory-Model-Experiment Triangle

0A: Locate Inputs

Parse $ARGUMENTS. Accept:

  • A .tex file path → read directly
  • A paper directory → read paper.tex + any /proofcheck audit if it exists
  • If /proofcheck audit exists, leverage assumption_ledger.md, theorem_inventory.md, dependency_graph.md for a head start

0B: Extract the Three Pillars

Read the paper and extract three structured inventories:

Pillar 1: Theory — What the theorems claim

ID Result Assumptions used Rate / bound Constants Regime Location

For each result, record:

  • Exact assumptions (named + implicit)
  • Convergence rate or bound (e.g., $O(n^{-1/2})$, $O_P(n^{-2/(2+d)})$)
  • Whether rate is minimax, near-minimax, or suboptimal (if known)
  • Sample size / dimension regime (e.g., $n \gg d$, $n \gg d^2$, fixed $d$)
  • Constants: universal, dimension-dependent, problem-parameter-dependent?

Read the full file on GitHub · 884 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 884 lines · 105 tokens per session scan A 1da0622a4fd3

Subscribe to this mod's changes

theory-sharpen is a skill published in the GitHub repository gyf9712/stat-theory-skills (9 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 105 tokens to every session and 10,976 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

did

Design, estimate, validate, and write up a difference-in-differences analysis, using the post-2018 heterogeneity-robust toolkit with an explicit statement of which parallel-trends assumption is imposed. TRIGGER on "difference-in-differences", "DiD", "TWFE", "event study", "staggered adoption", "parallel trends"…

ericluo04/claude-academic-workflow · 0 tokens

iv

Design, estimate, validate, and write up an instrumental-variables analysis: single-instrument LATE designs, weak-instrument-robust inference, shift-share instruments, formula instruments that need recentering, and leniency (judge and examiner) designs estimated by UJIVE. TRIGGER on "instrumental variable", "IV"…

ericluo04/claude-academic-workflow · 0 tokens

conjoint

Design, analyze, and write up conjoint experiments in both traditions: as randomized experiments identifying average marginal component effects, and as preference-measurement instruments (hierarchical Bayes partworths, WTP, choice-share simulation), with measurement-error correction, multiple-testing correction, and a…

ericluo04/claude-academic-workflow · 0 tokens

research-talk

Author a Quarto reveal.js deck for a research talk: seminar, conference, job talk, brown bag. TRIGGER on "slides for my talk", "seminar deck", "job talk", "turn this paper into slides", "add an appendix slide", "export a handout". Classroom material is teaching-lecture; auditing an existing deck is slide-review.

ericluo04/claude-academic-workflow · 0 tokens

field-experiment

Design, analyze, and write up randomized experiments (field experiments, A/B tests, RCTs): stratified and clustered designs, randomization inference, covariate adjustment done right, noncompliance, attrition and gated outcomes, treatment-effect heterogeneity, and interference. TRIGGER on "A/B test", "randomized…

ericluo04/claude-academic-workflow · 0 tokens

preregister

Draft a registry-ready preregistration or preanalysis plan for AsPredicted, OSF, or the AEA RCT Registry. TRIGGER on "preregister", "draft a preregistration", "AsPredicted form", "OSF prereg", "AEA RCT registry", "PAP", "preanalysis plan", or before launching a vignette, conjoint, MTurk/Prolific, or field experiment.…

ericluo04/claude-academic-workflow · 105 tokens