Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add hajekim/agentic-design-patterns-skills --skill reasoninggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hajekim/agentic-design-patterns-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hajekim/agentic-design-patterns-skills/reasoning)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hajekim/agentic-design-patterns-skills/reasoning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hajekim/agentic-design-patterns-skills/reasoning/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hajekim/agentic-design-patterns-skills/reasoning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hajekim/agentic-design-patterns-skills/reasoning.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00414 | $0.03880 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00207 | $0.01940 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00083 | $0.00776 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00041 | $0.00388 |
Grade A, and why
reasoning scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- reasoning — 100% identical, 3 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 445 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Reasoning Techniques Pattern
Overview
The Reasoning Techniques Pattern equips agents with structured approaches to thinking through problems before acting. Rather than jumping directly from input to output, reasoning-enhanced agents explicitly decompose problems, explore possibilities, verify their work, and reflect on their reasoning process — dramatically improving accuracy on complex tasks.
Core Principle: Slow down to speed up accuracy — structured thinking catches errors that fast pattern-matching misses.
When This Skill Applies
Activate this pattern when:
- Multi-step problems require logical deduction or causal reasoning
- Mathematical, coding, or analytical tasks require precise computation
- The agent must justify its conclusions (auditable decisions)
- Complex questions benefit from exploring multiple solution paths
- Self-consistency across multiple reasoning attempts is needed
- The agent must detect and correct its own errors before responding
Rule of thumb: If a human expert would "show their work" — the agent should too. Use reasoning techniques whenever accuracy matters more than speed.
Key Reasoning Techniques
1. Chain-of-Thought (CoT)
Break reasoning into explicit intermediate steps:
Problem → Step 1 → Step 2 → ... → Step N → Answer
2. ReAct (Reason + Act)
Interleave reasoning with tool use:
Thought → Action (tool call) → Observation → Thought → Action → ... → Answer
3. Tree of Thought (ToT)
Explore multiple reasoning branches and select the best:
Problem → Branch A → Branch B → Branch C
↓ (evaluate each)
Select Best Path → Answer
4. Self-Consistency
Generate multiple independent solutions, pick the majority answer:
Problem → Solution 1 → Answer A
→ Solution 2 → Answer A (consensus)
→ Solution 3 → Answer B
5. Self-Critique (Reflexion)
Agent critiques its own output and corrects it:
Problem → Initial Answer → Critique → Revised Answer → Critique → Final Answer
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 445 lines · 414 tokens per session scan A 922c62d17d33
reasoning is a skill published in the GitHub repository hajekim/agentic-design-patterns-skills (4 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 414 tokens to every session and 3,880 once invoked, about $0.0021 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
prompt-optimizer
Analyze raw prompts, identify intent and gaps, match ECC components (skills/commands/agents/hooks), and output a ready-to-paste optimized prompt. Advisory role only — never executes the task itself. TRIGGER when: user says "optimize prompt", "improve my prompt", "how to write a prompt for", "help me prompt", "rewrite…
gemini-api
Google Gemini API patterns for Python and TypeScript. Covers content generation, streaming, tool use (function calling), vision, system instructions, context caching, batch requests, and agent workflows. Use when building applications with the Gemini API or Google Generative AI SDKs.
image-prompt
A Korean-language skill that turns a rough image idea into a detailed prompt for gpt-image-2, OpenAI’s image-generation model.
regex-vs-llm-structured-text
Decision framework for choosing between regex and LLM when parsing structured text — start with regex, add LLM only for low-confidence edge cases.
foundation-models-on-device
Apple FoundationModels framework for on-device LLM — text generation, guided generation with @Generable, tool calling, and snapshot streaming in iOS 26+.
seedance-antislop
Detect and remove hollow AI filler language, empty superlatives, and vague boosters that degrade Seedance 2.0 prompt quality. Use when a prompt feels generic, over-written, or 'AI-sounding', or when generation output looks bland and needs a quality pass.