regex-vs-llm-structured-text

regex-vs-llm-structured-text is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from Jamkris/everything-gemini-code. It costs 38 tokens per session (1,590 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of regex-vs-llm-structured-text, MIT.

A decision guide for extracting repeated structure from text, such as quizzes, forms, invoices, and tables, using regular expressions or an AI language model. Regular expressions match known text patterns, while a language model handles less predictable wording.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to design hybrid text-parsing pipelines that clean extracted text, score confidence, and send only uncertain results to an AI validator.
Why use it?
It helps avoid using expensive and less predictable AI calls when simple pattern matching is enough, while still covering unusual cases.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to design hybrid text-parsing pipelines that clean extracted text, score confidence, and send only uncertain results to an AI validator.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/regex-vs-llm-structured-text
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Jamkris/everything-gemini-code --skill regex-vs-llm-structured-text
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jamkris/everything-gemini-code

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for regex-vs-llm-structured-text

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/regex-vs-llm-structured-text/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/regex-vs-llm-structured-text)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/regex-vs-llm-structured-text"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/regex-vs-llm-structured-text/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for regex-vs-llm-structured-text

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/regex-vs-llm-structured-text"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/regex-vs-llm-structured-text.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 38 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,590 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 95% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00038 $0.01590
Opus 5 $0.00019 $0.00795
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00318
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00159

Measured 5d ago against content hash 554ae64c1145, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

regex-vs-llm-structured-text scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

95% identical to regex-vs-llm-structured-text — 17 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/regex-vs-llm-structured-text/SKILL.md · 221 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 221 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Regex vs LLM for Structured Text Parsing

A practical decision framework for parsing structured text (quizzes, forms, invoices, documents). The key insight: regex handles 95-98% of cases cheaply and deterministically. Reserve expensive LLM calls for the remaining edge cases.

When to Use

  • Parsing structured text with repeating patterns (questions, forms, tables)
  • Deciding between regex and LLM for text extraction
  • Building hybrid pipelines that combine both approaches
  • Optimizing cost/accuracy tradeoffs in text processing

Decision Framework

Is the text format consistent and repeating?
├── Yes (>90% follows a pattern) → Start with Regex
│   ├── Regex handles 95%+ → Done, no LLM needed
│   └── Regex handles <95% → Add LLM for edge cases only
└── No (free-form, highly variable) → Use LLM directly

Architecture Pattern

Source Text
    │
    ▼
[Regex Parser] ─── Extracts structure (95-98% accuracy)
    │
    ▼
[Text Cleaner] ─── Removes noise (markers, page numbers, artifacts)
    │
    ▼
[Confidence Scorer] ─── Flags low-confidence extractions
    │
    ├── High confidence (≥0.95) → Direct output
    │
    └── Low confidence (<0.95) → [LLM Validator] → Output

Implementation

1. Regex Parser (Handles the Majority)

import re
from dataclasses import dataclass

@dataclass(frozen=True)
class ParsedItem:
    id: str
    text: str
    choices: tuple[str, ...]
    answer: str
    confidence: float = 1.0

def parse_structured_text(content: str) -> list[ParsedItem]:
    """Parse structured text using regex patterns."""
    pattern = re.compile(
        r"(?P<id>\d+)\.\s*(?P<text>.+?)\n"
        r"(?P<choices>(?:[A-D]\..+?\n)+)"
        r"Answer:\s*(?P<answer>[A-D])",
        re.MULTILINE | re.DOTALL,
    )
    items = []
    for match in pattern.finditer(content):
        choices = tuple(
            c.strip() for c in re.findall(r"[A-D]\.\s*(.+)", match.group("choices"))
        )
        items.append(ParsedItem(
            id=match.group("id"),
            text=match.group("text").strip(),
            choices=choices,
            answer=match.group("answer"),
        ))
    return items

Read the full file on GitHub · 221 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 221 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 554ae64c1145

Subscribe to this mod's changes

regex-vs-llm-structured-text is a skill published in the GitHub repository Jamkris/everything-gemini-code (88 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,590 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to regex-vs-llm-structured-text, differing in 17 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

image-prompt

A Korean-language skill that turns a rough image idea into a detailed prompt for gpt-image-2, OpenAI’s image-generation model.

daeryundf2-prog/LAZYANTIGRAVITY · 651 tokens

ai-llm-application

Group skill: AI/LLM application — provider selection, app patterns, RAG, agents, prompts, evaluation, safety, and monitoring.

may215/antigravity-awesome-group-skills · 36 tokens

ai-cost-token-optimizer

Expert guide for LLM API cost optimization, Prompt Caching, model routing (Flash/Pro/Opus), semantic caching, and token budgeting / Panduan ahli optimasi biaya API LLM, Prompt Caching, model routing, dan semantic caching.

roedyrustam/vibes-plug · 57 tokens

ai-prompt-engineering-expert

Expert guide for systematic Prompt Engineering, Chain-of-Thought, few-shot prompting, structured output (JSON mode), prompt versioning, and LLM evaluation / Panduan ahli rekayasa prompt dan evaluasi LLM.

roedyrustam/vibes-plug · 52 tokens

reasoning

This skill should be used when the user wants to "chain-of-thought prompting", "ReAct agent", "tree of thought", "step-by-step reasoning", "structured reasoning agents", "agent thinking", "scratchpad reasoning", "self-consistency", "reasoning traces", "deliberate thinking", "agent metacognition", "think before…

hajekim/agentic-design-patterns-skills · 414 tokens

appendix-prompt-engineering

This skill should be used when the user wants to learn "prompt engineering", "few-shot prompting", "zero-shot prompting", "chain of thought prompting", "structured output prompting", "role prompting", "system prompt design", "prompt best practices", "CoT prompting", "Pydantic structured output", "prompt iteration"…

hajekim/agentic-design-patterns-skills · 421 tokens