Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Jamkris/everything-gemini-code --skill regex-vs-llm-structured-textgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jamkris/everything-gemini-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/regex-vs-llm-structured-text)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/regex-vs-llm-structured-text"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/regex-vs-llm-structured-text/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/regex-vs-llm-structured-text"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/regex-vs-llm-structured-text.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.01590 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00795 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00318 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00159 |
Grade A, and why
regex-vs-llm-structured-text scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to regex-vs-llm-structured-text — 17 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 221 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Regex vs LLM for Structured Text Parsing
A practical decision framework for parsing structured text (quizzes, forms, invoices, documents). The key insight: regex handles 95-98% of cases cheaply and deterministically. Reserve expensive LLM calls for the remaining edge cases.
When to Use
- Parsing structured text with repeating patterns (questions, forms, tables)
- Deciding between regex and LLM for text extraction
- Building hybrid pipelines that combine both approaches
- Optimizing cost/accuracy tradeoffs in text processing
Decision Framework
Is the text format consistent and repeating?
├── Yes (>90% follows a pattern) → Start with Regex
│ ├── Regex handles 95%+ → Done, no LLM needed
│ └── Regex handles <95% → Add LLM for edge cases only
└── No (free-form, highly variable) → Use LLM directly
Architecture Pattern
Source Text
│
▼
[Regex Parser] ─── Extracts structure (95-98% accuracy)
│
▼
[Text Cleaner] ─── Removes noise (markers, page numbers, artifacts)
│
▼
[Confidence Scorer] ─── Flags low-confidence extractions
│
├── High confidence (≥0.95) → Direct output
│
└── Low confidence (<0.95) → [LLM Validator] → Output
Implementation
1. Regex Parser (Handles the Majority)
import re
from dataclasses import dataclass
@dataclass(frozen=True)
class ParsedItem:
id: str
text: str
choices: tuple[str, ...]
answer: str
confidence: float = 1.0
def parse_structured_text(content: str) -> list[ParsedItem]:
"""Parse structured text using regex patterns."""
pattern = re.compile(
r"(?P<id>\d+)\.\s*(?P<text>.+?)\n"
r"(?P<choices>(?:[A-D]\..+?\n)+)"
r"Answer:\s*(?P<answer>[A-D])",
re.MULTILINE | re.DOTALL,
)
items = []
for match in pattern.finditer(content):
choices = tuple(
c.strip() for c in re.findall(r"[A-D]\.\s*(.+)", match.group("choices"))
)
items.append(ParsedItem(
id=match.group("id"),
text=match.group("text").strip(),
choices=choices,
answer=match.group("answer"),
))
return items
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 221 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 554ae64c1145
regex-vs-llm-structured-text is a skill published in the GitHub repository Jamkris/everything-gemini-code (88 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,590 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to regex-vs-llm-structured-text, differing in 17 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
image-prompt
A Korean-language skill that turns a rough image idea into a detailed prompt for gpt-image-2, OpenAI’s image-generation model.
ai-llm-application
Group skill: AI/LLM application — provider selection, app patterns, RAG, agents, prompts, evaluation, safety, and monitoring.
ai-cost-token-optimizer
Expert guide for LLM API cost optimization, Prompt Caching, model routing (Flash/Pro/Opus), semantic caching, and token budgeting / Panduan ahli optimasi biaya API LLM, Prompt Caching, model routing, dan semantic caching.
ai-prompt-engineering-expert
Expert guide for systematic Prompt Engineering, Chain-of-Thought, few-shot prompting, structured output (JSON mode), prompt versioning, and LLM evaluation / Panduan ahli rekayasa prompt dan evaluasi LLM.
reasoning
This skill should be used when the user wants to "chain-of-thought prompting", "ReAct agent", "tree of thought", "step-by-step reasoning", "structured reasoning agents", "agent thinking", "scratchpad reasoning", "self-consistency", "reasoning traces", "deliberate thinking", "agent metacognition", "think before…
appendix-prompt-engineering
This skill should be used when the user wants to learn "prompt engineering", "few-shot prompting", "zero-shot prompting", "chain of thought prompting", "structured output prompting", "role prompting", "system prompt design", "prompt best practices", "CoT prompting", "Pydantic structured output", "prompt iteration"…