Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add hakula139/nixos-config --skill pr-review-toolkitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hakula139/nixos-configWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hakula139/nixos-config/pr-review-toolkit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hakula139/nixos-config/pr-review-toolkit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hakula139/nixos-config/pr-review-toolkit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hakula139/nixos-config/pr-review-toolkit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hakula139/nixos-config/pr-review-toolkit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.01015 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00508 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00203 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00102 |
Grade A, and why
pr-review-toolkit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 112 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A e4df86359afa
pr-review-toolkit is a skill published in the GitHub repository hakula139/nixos-config (5 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 1,015 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
quality-code
Standards for writing or modifying handwritten source code. Use when implementing code changes or reviewing handwritten code. Do not use for browsing, explanation, diagnosis without implementation, generated code, or vendored code.
code-qa
Review handwritten source code against the quality-code standards. Use only when the user explicitly invokes $code-qa. Do not infer use from an ordinary request to review, inspect, or explain code.
pi-review
A process for getting an independent review of a code or design change from a separate pi review session. The review uses either the sol or luna model and checks the repository or supplied document.
prune-comments
Guidance for removing code comments that merely repeat what the code already says. It keeps comments that explain non-obvious reasons, rules, or constraints.
why
Use for 'why does X work this way', 'why we picked Y', design rationale, regressions, postmortems, or data-backed thresholds. Discovers available MCPs and queries each evidence category (source control, issue tracker, long-form docs, real-time chat, infrastructure observability, error tracking, product analytics…
technical-writing
Layered technical-writing standard: Diátaxis structure, Google developer style sentences, STE instruction rules, Global English syntax. Use for /technical-writing or when writing or reviewing docs, RFCs, readmes, PR descriptions, or commit messages.