stakeholder-update

stakeholder-update is a skill for Claude Code from hamzafarooq/claude-code-starter. It costs 48 tokens per session (345 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A template for turning raw notes into a short weekly or monthly update for managers, leaders, or other teams.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to write stakeholder updates that explain what changed, what is at risk, what decisions are needed, and what comes next.
Why use it?
It organises scattered progress notes into clear status, achievements, blockers, decisions, and next steps.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

Good fit Use it to write stakeholder updates that explain what changed, what is at risk, what decisions are needed, and what comes next.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/hamzafarooq/claude-code-starter/stakeholder-update
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add hamzafarooq/claude-code-starter --skill stakeholder-update
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hamzafarooq/claude-code-starter

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for stakeholder-update

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hamzafarooq/claude-code-starter/stakeholder-update/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hamzafarooq/claude-code-starter/stakeholder-update)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hamzafarooq/claude-code-starter/stakeholder-update"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hamzafarooq/claude-code-starter/stakeholder-update/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for stakeholder-update

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hamzafarooq/claude-code-starter/stakeholder-update"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hamzafarooq/claude-code-starter/stakeholder-update.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 48 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 345 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00048 $0.00345
Opus 5.5 $0.00019 $0.00138
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00010 $0.00069
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00034

Measured 1mo ago against content hash cc0bb6643385, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

stakeholder-update scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/stakeholder-update/SKILL.md · 44 lines

What it actually says

Ask the user:

  1. "Paste your raw notes — bullet points, Slack messages, anything."
  2. "Who is the audience — direct manager, exec team, cross-functional partners, board?"
  3. "What's the tone — formal written update, or conversational Slack message?"

Then produce:


[Product/Team] Update — [Date or Period]

Status: 🟢 On track / 🟡 At risk / 🔴 Blocked (Choose one and note the reason if not green)

Progress this period

3–5 bullets. What shipped, what moved, what was decided. Lead with the most important thing first. Use past tense.

Blockers & risks

What is slowing progress or could derail the plan. Be specific — vague blockers don't get unblocked. Format: [What is blocked] → [What you need] → [By when]

Decisions needed from this audience

Be explicit. If you need something from the reader, say so directly with a deadline.

Next period focus

3 bullets on what the team is doing next. Enough context to make sense without a full briefing.


Formatting rules:

  • Lead with status, not pleasantries
  • No passive voice
  • No sentence longer than 20 words
  • If the audience is exec-level, cut the update by 30% after drafting

Ask: "Want a shorter Slack-friendly version of this?"

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 44 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A cc0bb6643385

Subscribe to this mod's changes

stakeholder-update is a skill published in the GitHub repository hamzafarooq/claude-code-starter (145 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 345 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.