Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add hani-q/qstack --skill qstack-loop-no-nonsensegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hani-q/qstackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hani-q/qstack/qstack-loop-no-nonsense)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hani-q/qstack/qstack-loop-no-nonsense"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hani-q/qstack/qstack-loop-no-nonsense/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hani-q/qstack/qstack-loop-no-nonsense"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hani-q/qstack/qstack-loop-no-nonsense.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 4 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 49 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 93 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 262 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- low Excessive Agency · line 183 Skill's behavior or capabilities extend beyond its stated purpose. Scope creep allows an agent to perform actions unrelated to its documented functionality, increasing the attack surface.Fix: Limit the skill's scope to its documented purpose. Remove instructions that enable the agent to perform actions outside its stated functionality.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.06663 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.02665 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.01333 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00666 |
Grade A, and why
qstack-loop-no-nonsense scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 562 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/qstack-loop-no-nonsense
Treat the plan as the contract. Execute it completely, but never silently change what it requires.
Resolve the plan
- Use the supplied plan path when present.
- Otherwise use a plan clearly referenced in the conversation.
- Otherwise inspect
qstack/compound_engineering/plans/*/plan.html, plus legacycompound-engineering/plans/*/plan.htmlandplan.mdfiles. Use the only plausible candidate; ask if more than one is plausible or none exists. Never select.template/.
Resolve the repository root, read its instruction files, then read the whole plan. Do not edit the plan: it is frozen once execution begins.
Verify approval before implementation. An explicit request to execute this
specific plan counts as approval to start only when the plan itself is not
marked draft, proposed, or otherwise unapproved and has no unresolved
blocking gate. If approval is absent or contradictory, stop and ask.
Choose the review mode
Review depth is the user's cost and quality choice. Resolve the plan, detect
whether it has a board, inspect any existing execution.md, and read plan and
repository review requirements without writing anything. Then settle the mode
before creating or updating execution files, migrating or claiming a board,
launching an agent, or editing implementation files.
--review full|final|none supplies the choice for automation. Reject any other
value. Always validate an existing execution.md first, with or without the
flag:
- if
Review modeis present, it appears exactly once and must befull,final, ornone; - no such field means a legacy
fullrun and is not rewritten merely to backfill the field; - a duplicated, malformed, or unknown value stops preflight without mutation.
Without the flag, reuse that recorded or legacy mode without asking. With the flag, it must match that mode as described below. For a new execution without the flag, ask one startup question, using the host's structured question tool when available and plain text when it is not. Ask it in the question shape the board protocol sets under Park and continue, and Resolve the board below says where that file is. That shape is the product-manager framing, the ELI10 version, and the options below with the recommended one first and its one-sentence reason. No card is parked, so the question carries no card line, and nothing beyond that shape is needed. With a board, the options are:
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +32 lines 5d8497b24d87
- 1mo ago Changed · +42 lines ee58b5949d53
- 1mo ago Changed · +97 lines 55081fe0728e
- 1mo ago First seen · 391 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A f80711c8425c
qstack-loop-no-nonsense is a skill published in the GitHub repository hani-q/qstack (7 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 6,663 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…