qstack-loop-trequartista

A skill for carrying out an approved software implementation plan while recording changes, execution evidence, and an adversarial review. An adversarial review deliberately looks for mistakes, weaknesses, and unexpected effects.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to locate the correct plan, verify that it is approved, execute it in the repository, and choose how deeply the completed work should be reviewed.
Why use it?
It keeps implementation tied to an agreed plan while allowing documented adjustments when the repository requires them.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/hani-q/qstack/qstack-loop-trequartista
Any agent
npx skills add hani-q/qstack --skill qstack-loop-trequartista
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hani-q/qstack

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 31 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,386 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00031 $0.04386
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.02193
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00877
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00439

Measured 2d ago against content hash 0064bef233d0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

qstack-loop-trequartista scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/qstack-loop-trequartista/SKILL.md · 406 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 406 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/qstack-loop-trequartista

Treat the plan as the shape of play, not a cage. Preserve its intent while making careful, visible adaptations when reality offers a better route.

Resolve the plan

  1. Use the supplied plan path when present.
  2. Otherwise use a plan clearly referenced in the conversation.
  3. Otherwise inspect qstack/compound_engineering/plans/*/plan.html, plus legacy compound-engineering/plans/*/plan.html and plan.md files. Use the only plausible candidate; ask if more than one is plausible or none exists. Never select .template/.

Resolve the repository root, read its instruction files, then read the whole plan. Do not edit the plan: it is frozen once execution begins.

Verify approval before implementation. An explicit request to execute this specific plan counts as approval to start only when the plan itself is not marked draft, proposed, or otherwise unapproved and has no unresolved blocking gate. If approval is absent or contradictory, stop and ask.

Choose the review mode

Review depth is the user's cost and quality choice. Resolve the plan, detect whether it has a board, inspect any existing execution.md, and read plan and repository review requirements without writing anything. Then settle the mode before creating or updating execution files, migrating or claiming a board, launching an agent, or editing implementation files.

--review full|final|none supplies the choice for automation. Reject any other value. Always validate an existing execution.md first, with or without the flag:

  • if Review mode is present, it appears exactly once and must be full, final, or none;
  • no such field means a legacy full run and is not rewritten merely to backfill the field;
  • a duplicated, malformed, or unknown value stops preflight without mutation.

Without the flag, reuse that recorded or legacy mode without asking. With the flag, it must match that mode as described below. For a new execution without the flag, ask one startup question, using the host's structured question tool when available and plain text when it is not. With a board, ask:

Read the full file on GitHub · 406 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 406 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 0064bef233d0

Subscribe to this mod's changes

qstack-loop-trequartista is a skill published in the GitHub repository hani-q/qstack (7 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 4,386 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

babysit-pr

Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…

openai/codex · 114 tokens

imagegen

Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…

openai/codex · 113 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens