Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to haojing8312/WorkClaw. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/haojing8312/WorkClaw/main/.agents/skills/workclaw-repo-hygiene-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/haojing8312/WorkClawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/haojing8312/workclaw/workclaw-repo-hygiene-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/haojing8312/workclaw/workclaw-repo-hygiene-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/haojing8312/workclaw/workclaw-repo-hygiene-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/haojing8312/workclaw/workclaw-repo-hygiene-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/haojing8312/workclaw/workclaw-repo-hygiene-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00317 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00127 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00063 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
workclaw-repo-hygiene-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
WorkClaw Repo Hygiene Review
Overview
Use this skill to triage repo hygiene findings and turn them into a small, reviewable cleanup recommendation. Keep the work read-only.
When to Use
pnpm review:repo-hygienehas findings to interpret- Temporary artifacts, dead code, duplicates, stale docs, or orphan files need triage
- A cleanup batch needs to be scoped before any destructive edit
Workflow
- Run
pnpm review:repo-hygiene. - Read
.artifacts/repo-hygiene/report.jsonand.artifacts/repo-hygiene/summary.md. - Group findings by category and confidence.
- Separate high-risk or uncertain items from confirmed cleanup candidates.
- Recommend the smallest cleanup batch that is still well supported.
- Stop after recommendation; do not delete, move, or rewrite files.
Output Shape
- Findings grouped by category
- Confidence and risk noted for each group
- Smallest cleanup batch recommendation
- Any follow-up checks needed before execution
Safety Rules
- Treat generated, runtime-owned, config-driven, and dynamically discovered files as high risk.
- Prefer compatibility fallbacks or deprecation when removal is not clearly safe.
- Do not perform cleanup actions in this skill.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 34 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 2a018c2e4cdf
workclaw-repo-hygiene-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository haojing8312/WorkClaw (140 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 317 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
workclaw-repo-hygiene-review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| workclaw-repo-hygiene-reviewhaojing8312/WorkClaw | Skill | 140 | 5mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 44 | Claude Code, Codex |
| autoreviewopenclaw/clawhub | Skill | 9.6k | today | MIT | A | 17 | Claude Code, Codex |
| omh-code-reviewrlaope/oh-my-hermes | Skill | 5.4k | today | MIT | A | 49 | Claude Code, Codex |
| agent-teams-simplify-and-hardenLeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills | Skill | 2.2k | 5d ago | MIT | A | 115 | Claude Code, Codex |
| revdiff-planumputun/revdiff | Skill | 951 | today | MIT | A | 84 | Claude Code |
| re0-mergeLilMGenius/paperthin | Skill | 1.4k | today | MIT | A | 51 | Claude Code, Codex |
| explore-unknownsdzhng/skills | Skill | 1.5k | yesterday | MIT | A | 162 | Claude Code, Codex |