Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/harmeet10000/skills/csharp-xunitnpx skills add Harmeet10000/skills --skill csharp-xunitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Harmeet10000/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/harmeet10000/skills/csharp-xunit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/harmeet10000/skills/csharp-xunit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/harmeet10000/skills/csharp-xunit.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00601 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00300 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00120 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00060 |
Grade A, and why
csharp-xunit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to csharp-xunit — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
XUnit Best Practices
Your goal is to help me write effective unit tests with XUnit, covering both standard and data-driven testing approaches.
Project Setup
- Use a separate test project with naming convention
[ProjectName].Tests - Reference Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk, xunit, and xunit.runner.visualstudio packages
- Create test classes that match the classes being tested (e.g.,
CalculatorTestsforCalculator) - Use .NET SDK test commands:
dotnet testfor running tests
Test Structure
- No test class attributes required (unlike MSTest/NUnit)
- Use fact-based tests with
[Fact]attribute for simple tests - Follow the Arrange-Act-Assert (AAA) pattern
- Name tests using the pattern
MethodName_Scenario_ExpectedBehavior - Use constructor for setup and
IDisposable.Dispose()for teardown - Use
IClassFixture<T>for shared context between tests in a class - Use
ICollectionFixture<T>for shared context between multiple test classes
Standard Tests
- Keep tests focused on a single behavior
- Avoid testing multiple behaviors in one test method
- Use clear assertions that express intent
- Include only the assertions needed to verify the test case
- Make tests independent and idempotent (can run in any order)
- Avoid test interdependencies
Data-Driven Tests
- Use
[Theory]combined with data source attributes - Use
[InlineData]for inline test data - Use
[MemberData]for method-based test data - Use
[ClassData]for class-based test data - Create custom data attributes by implementing
DataAttribute - Use meaningful parameter names in data-driven tests
Assertions
- Use
Assert.Equalfor value equality - Use
Assert.Samefor reference equality - Use
Assert.True/Assert.Falsefor boolean conditions - Use
Assert.Contains/Assert.DoesNotContainfor collections - Use
Assert.Matches/Assert.DoesNotMatchfor regex pattern matching - Use
Assert.Throws<T>orawait Assert.ThrowsAsync<T>to test exceptions - Use fluent assertions library for more readable assertions
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 69 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 7a2d020e24a5
csharp-xunit is a skill published in the GitHub repository Harmeet10000/skills (7 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 601 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to csharp-xunit, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
dev-browser
Browser automation with persistent page state. Use when users ask to navigate websites, fill forms, take screenshots, extract web data, test web apps, or automate browser workflows. Trigger phrases include "go to [url]", "click on", "fill out the form", "take a screenshot", "scrape", "automate", "test the website"…
chat-sdk
Build multi-platform chat bots with Chat SDK (chat npm package). Use when developers want to (1) Build a Slack, Teams, Google Chat, Discord, Telegram, GitHub, Linear, or WhatsApp bot, (2) Use Chat SDK to handle mentions, direct messages, subscribed threads, reactions, slash commands, cards, modals, files, or AI…
hpp
HTTP Parameter Pollution — parser discrepancies between proxy/server/app, WAF bypass, auth/ACL bypass, injection delivery.
csrf
Cross-Site Request Forgery — missing/invalid tokens, method override, JSON CSRF, SameSite gaps, double-submit flaws, login/logout CSRF, and CSRF-via-XSS chains to account takeover.
prototype-pollution
Hunt JavaScript prototype pollution (CWE-1321) — the 2023-2026 meta-vulnerability that chains into RCE, auth bypass, and SSRF on most Node.js stacks.
graphql
GraphQL exploitation — introspection, injection, authorization bypass, and data exfiltration through GraphQL APIs.