Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Harmeet10000/skills --skill langchain-architecturegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Harmeet10000/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/harmeet10000/skills/langchain-architecture)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/harmeet10000/skills/langchain-architecture"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/harmeet10000/skills/langchain-architecture/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/harmeet10000/skills/langchain-architecture"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/harmeet10000/skills/langchain-architecture.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.04746 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.01898 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00949 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00475 |
Grade A, and why
langchain-architecture scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- langchain-architecture — 100% identical, 10 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 667 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
LangChain & LangGraph Architecture
Master modern LangChain 1.x and LangGraph for building sophisticated LLM applications with agents, state management, memory, and tool integration.
When to Use This Skill
- Building autonomous AI agents with tool access
- Implementing complex multi-step LLM workflows
- Managing conversation memory and state
- Integrating LLMs with external data sources and APIs
- Creating modular, reusable LLM application components
- Implementing document processing pipelines
- Building production-grade LLM applications
Package Structure (LangChain 1.x)
langchain (1.2.x) # High-level orchestration
langchain-core (1.2.x) # Core abstractions (messages, prompts, tools)
langchain-community # Third-party integrations
langgraph # Agent orchestration and state management
langchain-openai # OpenAI integrations
langchain-anthropic # Anthropic/Claude integrations
langchain-voyageai # Voyage AI embeddings
langchain-pinecone # Pinecone vector store
Core Concepts
1. LangGraph Agents
LangGraph is the standard for building agents in 2026. It provides:
Key Features:
- StateGraph: Explicit state management with typed state
- Durable Execution: Agents persist through failures
- Human-in-the-Loop: Inspect and modify state at any point
- Memory: Short-term and long-term memory across sessions
- Checkpointing: Save and resume agent state
Agent Patterns:
- ReAct: Reasoning + Acting with
create_react_agent - Plan-and-Execute: Separate planning and execution nodes
- Multi-Agent: Supervisor routing between specialized agents
- Tool-Calling: Structured tool invocation with Pydantic schemas
2. State Management
LangGraph uses TypedDict for explicit state:
from typing import Annotated, TypedDict
from langgraph.graph import MessagesState
# Simple message-based state
class AgentState(MessagesState):
"""Extends MessagesState with custom fields."""
context: Annotated[list, "retrieved documents"]
# Custom state for complex agents
class CustomState(TypedDict):
messages: Annotated[list, "conversation history"]
context: Annotated[dict, "retrieved context"]
current_step: str
results: list
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 667 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A f58823d6102d
langchain-architecture is a skill published in the GitHub repository Harmeet10000/skills (7 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 4,746 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
langchain-patterns
Use when langChain/LangGraph patterns — chains, agents, tools, memory, retrieval, graph workflows. Use when working with langchain patterns.
knowledge-org
A guide to organising large bodies of knowledge so an AI system can navigate relationships, summaries, and layers instead of searching only flat text chunks. It covers tree indexes, knowledge graphs, file-like structures, incremental updates, and long-term memory layouts.
adversarial-ml-evasion
Craft adversarial examples that cause trained ML classifiers to misclassify at inference time — image recognition, malware detectors, IDS, spam filters.
llm-redteam-overview
LLM red team category — full AATMF v3 tactic coverage (T01–T15). Routing skill: read this first to identify which tactic applies, then load the matching sub-skill. Maps to MITRE ATLAS where overlap exists.
misinformation
Hunt LLM misinformation / overreliance (OWASP LLM09:2025) — confident-but-wrong outputs that flow into downstream automated decisions, compliance reports, customer communications, or autonomous code commits without verification.
sensitive-information-disclosure
Hunt LLM sensitive-information disclosure (OWASP LLM02:2025) — leakage of PII, secrets, internal source, model details, and other-tenant data through model outputs, training-data extraction, or retrieval-side joins.