Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Harmeet10000/skills --skill langchain-architecturegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Harmeet10000/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/harmeet10000/skills/langchain-architecture)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/harmeet10000/skills/langchain-architecture"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/harmeet10000/skills/langchain-architecture/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/harmeet10000/skills/langchain-architecture"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/harmeet10000/skills/langchain-architecture.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.04746 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.02373 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00949 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00475 |
Grade A, and why
langchain-architecture scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- langchain-architecture — 100% identical, 10 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 667 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
LangChain & LangGraph Architecture
Master modern LangChain 1.x and LangGraph for building sophisticated LLM applications with agents, state management, memory, and tool integration.
When to Use This Skill
- Building autonomous AI agents with tool access
- Implementing complex multi-step LLM workflows
- Managing conversation memory and state
- Integrating LLMs with external data sources and APIs
- Creating modular, reusable LLM application components
- Implementing document processing pipelines
- Building production-grade LLM applications
Package Structure (LangChain 1.x)
langchain (1.2.x) # High-level orchestration
langchain-core (1.2.x) # Core abstractions (messages, prompts, tools)
langchain-community # Third-party integrations
langgraph # Agent orchestration and state management
langchain-openai # OpenAI integrations
langchain-anthropic # Anthropic/Claude integrations
langchain-voyageai # Voyage AI embeddings
langchain-pinecone # Pinecone vector store
Core Concepts
1. LangGraph Agents
LangGraph is the standard for building agents in 2026. It provides:
Key Features:
- StateGraph: Explicit state management with typed state
- Durable Execution: Agents persist through failures
- Human-in-the-Loop: Inspect and modify state at any point
- Memory: Short-term and long-term memory across sessions
- Checkpointing: Save and resume agent state
Agent Patterns:
- ReAct: Reasoning + Acting with
create_react_agent - Plan-and-Execute: Separate planning and execution nodes
- Multi-Agent: Supervisor routing between specialized agents
- Tool-Calling: Structured tool invocation with Pydantic schemas
2. State Management
LangGraph uses TypedDict for explicit state:
from typing import Annotated, TypedDict
from langgraph.graph import MessagesState
# Simple message-based state
class AgentState(MessagesState):
"""Extends MessagesState with custom fields."""
context: Annotated[list, "retrieved documents"]
# Custom state for complex agents
class CustomState(TypedDict):
messages: Annotated[list, "conversation history"]
context: Annotated[dict, "retrieved context"]
current_step: str
results: list
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 667 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A f58823d6102d
langchain-architecture is a skill published in the GitHub repository Harmeet10000/skills (7 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 4,746 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
langchain-patterns
Use when langChain/LangGraph patterns — chains, agents, tools, memory, retrieval, graph workflows. Use when working with langchain patterns.
langchain
Framework for building LLM-powered applications with agents, chains, and RAG. Supports multiple providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google), 500+ integrations, ReAct agents, tool calling, memory management, and vector store retrieval. Use for building chatbots, question-answering systems, autonomous agents, or RAG…
adversarial-ml-evasion
Craft adversarial examples that cause trained ML classifiers to misclassify at inference time — image recognition, malware detectors, IDS, spam filters.
llm-redteam-overview
LLM red team category — full AATMF v3 tactic coverage (T01–T15). Routing skill: read this first to identify which tactic applies, then load the matching sub-skill. Maps to MITRE ATLAS where overlap exists.
misinformation
Hunt LLM misinformation / overreliance (OWASP LLM09:2025) — confident-but-wrong outputs that flow into downstream automated decisions, compliance reports, customer communications, or autonomous code commits without verification.
vector-and-embedding-weaknesses
Hunt vector / embedding weaknesses (OWASP LLM08:2025) — adversarial inputs against the RAG / similarity layer that cause cross-tenant leak, embedding-inversion privacy loss, semantic confusion, and retriever-driven prompt injection.