Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/harshanandak/forge/activationnpx skills add harshanandak/forge --skill activationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/harshanandak/forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/harshanandak/forge/activation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/harshanandak/forge/activation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/harshanandak/forge/activation.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00130 | $0.00763 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00065 | $0.00381 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00153 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
activation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 63 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Forge activation (front door)
You are orienting a project where Forge is available (installed as a global plugin
or an npm dev-dep) but not yet engaged. Your job is to orient first, then offer —
never force. This skill creates nothing by itself; a mutating forge verb is what
lazily initializes .forge/.
Orient first (state findings BEFORE offering)
Run read-only checks, then STATE what you found in one short paragraph before you offer any setup. Do not opine or prescribe before you have looked.
- Is Forge initialized?
test -d .forge && echo present || echo absent - What kind of project is this?
package.jsonpresent → JS/TS project (note the package manager: bun/npm/pnpm/yarn lockfile).- Markdown-heavy, no
package.json→ docs / planning repo. - Otherwise → describe what you see (language, build files).
- Is it a git repo?
git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree 2>/dev/null
Then say, in your own words: "Here's what this project looks like today: …" —
project type, whether .forge/ exists, git status. Only after stating this do you
offer anything.
Then offer the bare minimum (never forced)
Present setup as a conversational choice, not a mandate:
- If
.forge/is absent: explain that Forge needs no setup step to be useful — read-only verbs (forge status,forge ready,forge show <id>) work immediately and write nothing. The first mutating verb (forge claim,forge create,forge remember) lazily creates a bare-minimum, gates-disabled.forge/skeleton. Nothing heavier (git hooks, lefthook, protected paths,.mcp.json, scripts tree) is installed unless the user later runsforge setup. - If
.forge/is present: say so and route to the right stage instead — this skill's work is done.
Offer, then stop and let the user choose. Do not run forge setup or install hooks
on their behalf unless they ask.
Terminal state → next step
This is a front-door primitive, not the full workflow. After orienting and offering:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 63 lines · 130 tokens per session scan A a150e3bd4f32
activation is a skill published in the GitHub repository harshanandak/forge (4 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 130 tokens to every session and 763 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…