Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/content-hash-cache-patternnpx skills add hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins --skill content-hash-cache-patterngit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/content-hash-cache-pattern)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/content-hash-cache-pattern"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/content-hash-cache-pattern.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00030 | $0.01282 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00641 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00256 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00128 |
Grade A, and why
content-hash-cache-pattern scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to content-hash-cache-pattern — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 162 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Content-Hash File Cache Pattern
Cache expensive file processing results (PDF parsing, text extraction, image analysis) using SHA-256 content hashes as cache keys. Unlike path-based caching, this approach survives file moves/renames and auto-invalidates when content changes.
When to Activate
- Building file processing pipelines (PDF, images, text extraction)
- Processing cost is high and same files are processed repeatedly
- Need a
--cache/--no-cacheCLI option - Want to add caching to existing pure functions without modifying them
Core Pattern
1. Content-Hash Based Cache Key
Use file content (not path) as the cache key:
import hashlib
from pathlib import Path
_HASH_CHUNK_SIZE = 65536 # 64KB chunks for large files
def compute_file_hash(path: Path) -> str:
"""SHA-256 of file contents (chunked for large files)."""
if not path.is_file():
raise FileNotFoundError(f"File not found: {path}")
sha256 = hashlib.sha256()
with open(path, "rb") as f:
while True:
chunk = f.read(_HASH_CHUNK_SIZE)
if not chunk:
break
sha256.update(chunk)
return sha256.hexdigest()
Why content hash? File rename/move = cache hit. Content change = automatic invalidation. No index file needed.
2. Frozen Dataclass for Cache Entry
from dataclasses import dataclass
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
class CacheEntry:
file_hash: str
source_path: str
document: ExtractedDocument # The cached result
3. File-Based Cache Storage
Each cache entry is stored as {hash}.json — O(1) lookup by hash, no index file required.
import json
from typing import Any
def write_cache(cache_dir: Path, entry: CacheEntry) -> None:
cache_dir.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
cache_file = cache_dir / f"{entry.file_hash}.json"
data = serialize_entry(entry)
cache_file.write_text(json.dumps(data, ensure_ascii=False), encoding="utf-8")
def read_cache(cache_dir: Path, file_hash: str) -> CacheEntry | None:
cache_file = cache_dir / f"{file_hash}.json"
if not cache_file.is_file():
return None
try:
raw = cache_file.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
data = json.loads(raw)
return deserialize_entry(data)
except (json.JSONDecodeError, ValueError, KeyError):
return None # Treat corruption as cache miss
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 162 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A cdef26f0fc59
content-hash-cache-pattern is a skill published in the GitHub repository hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins (924 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 1,282 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to content-hash-cache-pattern, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
search
Search 2500+ curated ChatGPT and LLM open-source repositories. Use when the user asks to find tools, libraries, or repos related to ChatGPT, LLMs, RAG, agents, langchain, NLP, AI development, or any open-source AI tooling.
similar-resources
Given a Japanese NLP GitHub repo or Hugging Face model/dataset (URL / owner/repo / tool name), find repositories or models/datasets that do the same or related processing. Mines the bundled dataset for content-similar items, then expands via web research across both GitHub and Hugging Face, then merges and re-ranks.
sprr
Single PR reviewer for awesome-quant. Use when the user asks to review, validate, comment on, label, close, or merge one specific pull request that adds README.md entries. Triggers include "sprr", "review PR", "check PR", and "validate contribution".
bprr
Bulk PR reviewer for awesome-quant. Use when the user asks to review all open PRs, review unreviewed PRs, bulk review, or mentions "bprr". Reviews open PRs lacking the reviewed label and presents a summary before any merge/comment/label action.
reverse-engineering-android-malware-with-jadx
Reverse engineers malicious Android APK files using JADX decompiler to analyze Java/Kotlin source code, identify malicious functionality including data theft, C2 communication, privilege escalation, and overlay attacks. Examines manifest permissions, receivers, services, and native libraries. Activates for requests…
implementing-code-signing-for-artifacts
This skill covers implementing code signing for build artifacts to ensure integrity and authenticity throughout the software supply chain. It addresses signing binaries, packages, and containers using GPG, Sigstore, and platform-specific signing tools, establishing trust chains, and verifying signatures in deployment…