Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins --skill crosspostgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/crosspost)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/crosspost"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/crosspost/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/crosspost"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/crosspost.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.00774 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00387 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00155 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
crosspost scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to crosspost — 11 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 118 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Crosspost
Distribute content across platforms without turning it into the same fake post in four costumes.
When to Activate
- the user wants to publish the same underlying idea across multiple platforms
- a launch, update, release, or essay needs platform-specific versions
- the user says "crosspost", "post this everywhere", or "adapt this for X and LinkedIn"
Core Rules
- Do not publish identical copy across platforms.
- Preserve the author's voice across platforms.
- Adapt for constraints, not stereotypes.
- One post should still be about one thing.
- Do not invent a CTA, question, or moral if the source did not earn one.
Workflow
Step 1: Start with the Primary Version
Pick the strongest source version first:
- the original X post
- the original article
- the launch note
- the thread
- the memo or changelog
Use content-engine first if the source still needs voice shaping.
Step 2: Capture the Voice Fingerprint
Run brand-voice first if the source voice is not already captured in the current session.
Before adapting, note:
- how blunt or explanatory the source is
- whether the source uses fragments, lists, or longer transitions
- whether the source uses parentheses
- whether the source avoids questions, hashtags, or CTA language
The adaptation should preserve that fingerprint.
Step 3: Adapt by Platform Constraint
X
- keep it compressed
- lead with the sharpest claim or artifact
- use a thread only when a single post would collapse the argument
- avoid hashtags and generic filler
- add only the context needed for people outside the niche
- do not turn it into a fake founder-reflection post
- do not add a closing question just because it is LinkedIn
- do not force a polished "professional tone" if the author is naturally sharper
Threads
- keep it readable and direct
- do not write fake hyper-casual creator copy
- do not paste the LinkedIn version and shorten it
Bluesky
- keep it concise
- preserve the author's cadence
- do not rely on hashtags or feed-gaming language
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 118 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A f78cd1b24884
crosspost is a skill published in the GitHub repository hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins (956 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 774 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to crosspost, differing in 11 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
search
Search 2500+ curated ChatGPT and LLM open-source repositories. Use when the user asks to find tools, libraries, or repos related to ChatGPT, LLMs, RAG, agents, langchain, NLP, AI development, or any open-source AI tooling.
sprr
Single PR reviewer for awesome-quant. Use when the user asks to review, validate, comment on, label, close, or merge one specific pull request that adds README.md entries. Triggers include "sprr", "review PR", "check PR", and "validate contribution".
bprr
Bulk PR reviewer for awesome-quant. Use when the user asks to review all open PRs, review unreviewed PRs, bulk review, or mentions "bprr". Reviews open PRs lacking the reviewed label and presents a summary before any merge/comment/label action.
drawio-reconstruction
Reconstructs reference images into high-fidelity, editable Draw.io files with rendered previews: native Draw.io elements carry text and structure, SVG covers simple icons that match the reference, and cropped or transparent PNGs preserve complex visuals. Use when the user wants a diagram image, research figure…
benchmark-paper-template
Structures Benchmark and Evaluation papers using the five-pillar framework (Research Gap, Construction Pipeline, Evaluation Framework, Empirical Findings, optional Companion Method). Returns a completeness audit, a six-part Introduction logic chain, a Section 2-7 skeleton, and a pre-submission checklist. Use when…
reverse-engineering-android-malware-with-jadx
Reverse engineers malicious Android APK files using JADX decompiler to analyze Java/Kotlin source code, identify malicious functionality including data theft, C2 communication, privilege escalation, and overlay attacks. Examines manifest permissions, receivers, services, and native libraries. Activates for requests…