Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/golang-testingnpx skills add hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins --skill golang-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/golang-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/golang-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/golang-testing.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.04279 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.02139 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00856 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00428 |
Grade A, and why
golang-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to golang-testing — 27 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 721 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Go Testing Patterns
Comprehensive Go testing patterns for writing reliable, maintainable tests following TDD methodology.
When to Activate
- Writing new Go functions or methods
- Adding test coverage to existing code
- Creating benchmarks for performance-critical code
- Implementing fuzz tests for input validation
- Following TDD workflow in Go projects
TDD Workflow for Go
The RED-GREEN-REFACTOR Cycle
RED → Write a failing test first
GREEN → Write minimal code to pass the test
REFACTOR → Improve code while keeping tests green
REPEAT → Continue with next requirement
Step-by-Step TDD in Go
// Step 1: Define the interface/signature
// calculator.go
package calculator
func Add(a, b int) int {
panic("not implemented") // Placeholder
}
// Step 2: Write failing test (RED)
// calculator_test.go
package calculator
import "testing"
func TestAdd(t *testing.T) {
got := Add(2, 3)
want := 5
if got != want {
t.Errorf("Add(2, 3) = %d; want %d", got, want)
}
}
// Step 3: Run test - verify FAIL
// $ go test
// --- FAIL: TestAdd (0.00s)
// panic: not implemented
// Step 4: Implement minimal code (GREEN)
func Add(a, b int) int {
return a + b
}
// Step 5: Run test - verify PASS
// $ go test
// PASS
// Step 6: Refactor if needed, verify tests still pass
Table-Driven Tests
The standard pattern for Go tests. Enables comprehensive coverage with minimal code.
func TestAdd(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
a, b int
expected int
}{
{"positive numbers", 2, 3, 5},
{"negative numbers", -1, -2, -3},
{"zero values", 0, 0, 0},
{"mixed signs", -1, 1, 0},
{"large numbers", 1000000, 2000000, 3000000},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
got := Add(tt.a, tt.b)
if got != tt.expected {
t.Errorf("Add(%d, %d) = %d; want %d",
tt.a, tt.b, got, tt.expected)
}
})
}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 721 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 2da1afcd9df6
golang-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins (935 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 4,279 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to golang-testing, differing in 27 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
tdd-workflow
Enforce practical Test-Driven Development for code changes in Go services. Use for new features, bug fixes, refactors, API changes, and new modules. Requires Red-Green-Refactor evidence, defect-hypothesis-driven tests, killer cases, and coverage gates (line + risk-path).
blitz
/blitz - Blitz Mode Commander.
golang-patterns
Idiomatic Go patterns, best practices, and conventions for building robust, efficient, and maintainable Go applications. Use when writing or reviewing Go code and idiomatic structure or conventions are in question.
python
Python development with ruff, mypy, pytest - TDD and type safety.
golang-testing
Go testing patterns including table-driven tests, subtests, benchmarks, fuzzing, and test coverage. Follows TDD methodology with idiomatic Go practices.
golang-testing
テスト駆動開発とGoコードの高品質を保証するための包括的なテスト戦略。.