Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/hermeticormus/claude-code-game-development/rag-implementationnpx skills add HermeticOrmus/claude-code-game-development --skill rag-implementationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HermeticOrmus/claude-code-game-developmentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hermeticormus/claude-code-game-development/rag-implementation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hermeticormus/claude-code-game-development/rag-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hermeticormus/claude-code-game-development/rag-implementation.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.02660 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.01330 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00532 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00266 |
Grade A, and why
rag-implementation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to rag-implementation — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 404 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
RAG Implementation
Master Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to build LLM applications that provide accurate, grounded responses using external knowledge sources.
When to Use This Skill
- Building Q&A systems over proprietary documents
- Creating chatbots with current, factual information
- Implementing semantic search with natural language queries
- Reducing hallucinations with grounded responses
- Enabling LLMs to access domain-specific knowledge
- Building documentation assistants
- Creating research tools with source citation
Core Components
1. Vector Databases
Purpose: Store and retrieve document embeddings efficiently
Options:
- Pinecone: Managed, scalable, fast queries
- Weaviate: Open-source, hybrid search
- Milvus: High performance, on-premise
- Chroma: Lightweight, easy to use
- Qdrant: Fast, filtered search
- FAISS: Meta's library, local deployment
2. Embeddings
Purpose: Convert text to numerical vectors for similarity search
Models:
- text-embedding-ada-002 (OpenAI): General purpose, 1536 dims
- all-MiniLM-L6-v2 (Sentence Transformers): Fast, lightweight
- e5-large-v2: High quality, multilingual
- Instructor: Task-specific instructions
- bge-large-en-v1.5: SOTA performance
3. Retrieval Strategies
Approaches:
- Dense Retrieval: Semantic similarity via embeddings
- Sparse Retrieval: Keyword matching (BM25, TF-IDF)
- Hybrid Search: Combine dense + sparse
- Multi-Query: Generate multiple query variations
- HyDE: Generate hypothetical documents
4. Reranking
Purpose: Improve retrieval quality by reordering results
Methods:
- Cross-Encoders: BERT-based reranking
- Cohere Rerank: API-based reranking
- Maximal Marginal Relevance (MMR): Diversity + relevance
- LLM-based: Use LLM to score relevance
Quick Start
from langchain.document_loaders import DirectoryLoader
from langchain.text_splitters import RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter
from langchain.embeddings import OpenAIEmbeddings
from langchain.vectorstores import Chroma
from langchain.chains import RetrievalQA
from langchain.llms import OpenAI
# 1. Load documents
loader = DirectoryLoader('./docs', glob="**/*.txt")
documents = loader.load()
# 2. Split into chunks
text_splitter = RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter(
chunk_size=1000,
chunk_overlap=200,
length_function=len
)
chunks = text_splitter.split_documents(documents)
# 3. Create embeddings and vector store
embeddings = OpenAIEmbeddings()
vectorstore = Chroma.from_documents(chunks, embeddings)
# 4. Create retrieval chain
qa_chain = RetrievalQA.from_chain_type(
llm=OpenAI(),
chain_type="stuff",
retriever=vectorstore.as_retriever(search_kwargs={"k": 4}),
return_source_documents=True
)
# 5. Query
result = qa_chain({"query": "What are the main features?"})
print(result['result'])
print(result['source_documents'])
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 404 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 663facf47b22
rag-implementation is a skill published in the GitHub repository HermeticOrmus/claude-code-game-development (60 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 2,660 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to rag-implementation, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
paranoia-ai-system-evolver
用于升级 AI 系统、agent workflow、Codex skill、prompt、memory、RAG、tool routing、schema、eval set 或 feedback loop;也用于把 AI 工作单从指令单升级为意图单,并对研究、检索、测试和 AI 对话做 VOI 决策门审计。需要 Intent Work Order、WOOP 任务准入、决策对象、VOI/EVPI/EVSI、UL(Uncertainty Ladder,不确定性阶梯)、OODA、eval、Human Gate、versioning 与 rollback 的受控演化时使用。Use when controlled AI system…
Vizra ADK Memory System
Implement persistent memory, session context, and vector memory (RAG) for AI agents.
ai-orchestration-langchain
LangChain.js patterns for building LLM applications — chat models, LCEL chains, prompt templates, structured output, agents, tools, RAG, streaming, and LangSmith tracing.
meta-planning-ai-planning
AI specification planning frameworks. Use when a spec touches model calls, prompts, retrieval, tool calling, agentic loops, or evals. Covers approach selection, model and provider choice, structured output contracts, loop guards, budgets, failure modes, and eval design.
ai-orchestration-llamaindex
LlamaIndex.TS data framework for RAG, indexing, retrieval, query engines, chat engines, and agentic workflows in TypeScript.
ai-orchestration-vercel-ai-sdk
Vercel AI SDK patterns - providers, text generation, streaming, structured output, tool calling, chat UI hooks, embeddings, and RAG.