Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add HeshamFS/materials-simulation-skills --skill convergence-studygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HeshamFS/materials-simulation-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/heshamfs/materials-simulation-skills/convergence-study)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/heshamfs/materials-simulation-skills/convergence-study"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/heshamfs/materials-simulation-skills/convergence-study/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/heshamfs/materials-simulation-skills/convergence-study"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/heshamfs/materials-simulation-skills/convergence-study.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00116 | $0.03106 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00046 | $0.01242 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00621 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00311 |
Grade A, and why
convergence-study scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 199 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Convergence Study
Goal
Provide script-driven convergence analysis for verifying that numerical solutions converge at the expected rate as the mesh or timestep is refined.
Requirements
- Python 3.10+
- No third-party packages — scripts use only the Python standard library (
math).
Inputs to Gather
| Input | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Grid spacings | Sequence of mesh sizes (coarse to fine) | 0.4,0.2,0.1,0.05 |
| Timestep sizes | Sequence of dt values | 0.04,0.02,0.01 |
| Solution values | QoI at each refinement level | 1.16,1.04,1.01,1.0025 |
| Expected order | Formal order of the numerical scheme | 2.0 |
| Safety factor | GCI safety factor (1.25 default) | 1.25 |
Script Outputs (JSON Fields)
| Script | Key Outputs |
|---|---|
scripts/h_refinement.py |
results.observed_orders, results.mean_order, results.richardson_extrapolated_value, results.convergence_assessment |
scripts/dt_refinement.py |
Same as h_refinement but for temporal convergence |
scripts/richardson_extrapolation.py |
results.extrapolated_value, results.error_estimate, results.observed_order |
scripts/gci_calculator.py |
results.observed_order, results.gci_fine, results.gci_coarse, results.asymptotic_ratio, results.in_asymptotic_range, results.extrapolated_value, results.notes |
Workflow
- Run grid/timestep refinement study with at least 3 levels
- Compute observed convergence order with
h_refinement.pyordt_refinement.py - Compare observed order to expected order of the scheme
- Estimate discretization error via Richardson extrapolation
- Report GCI for formal solution verification using
gci_calculator.py - Document convergence results and any anomalies
Decision Guidance
Do you have 3+ refinement levels?
+-- YES --> Run h_refinement.py or dt_refinement.py
| +-- Observed order matches expected? --> Order agreement; check persistence and error assumptions
| +-- Order too low? --> Check: pre-asymptotic, coding error, insufficient resolution
| +-- Order too high? --> Check: superconvergence or cancellation effects
+-- NO (only 2 levels) --> Use richardson_extrapolation.py with assumed order
(less reliable without order verification)
What ships with it
9 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- CHANGELOG.md 3.7 KB
- evals/evals.json 13 KB
- references/convergence_theory.md 3.2 KB
- references/gci_guidelines.md 4.2 KB
- scripts/_support/refinement_order.py 2.1 KB runs code
- scripts/dt_refinement.py 8.5 KB runs code
- scripts/gci_calculator.py 7.2 KB runs code
- scripts/h_refinement.py 11 KB runs code
- scripts/richardson_extrapolation.py 5.5 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed · +20 lines 2fb1169ce9a7
- 1mo ago First seen · 179 lines · 116 tokens per session scan A f08864b34236
convergence-study is a skill published in the GitHub repository HeshamFS/materials-simulation-skills (83 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 116 tokens to every session and 3,106 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
personal-genomics
Analyse personal DNA / genome files for pharmacogenomics, disease risk, carrier status, ancestry and traits. Use whenever the user mentions DNA or genome analysis, a raw genome file, gene names, drug-gene interactions, or wants to combine multiple DNA sources.
web-components
Architecture and coding rules for single-page applications using web components, BCE layering, lit-html templating, unidirectional Redux-style state management (reduction.js, standards-based), and standards-based client-side routing (Navigation API + URLPattern). Web standards and web platform first, minimal external…
sbce
Spec-driven BCE workflow where one capability spec equals one business component (same name) and the spec is the boundary contract. Invoked as /sbce new|apply (or by intent), it drives declare → converge; the stack's own test loop is the oracle for "done". new accepts a BC name or a natural-language feature…
javascript-conventions
Generic, composable JavaScript (ECMAScript) code conventions — modules, declarations, functions, collections, asynchrony, errors, JSDoc types, naming, and the Baseline lookup that decides which language and standard-library features may be used. Technology-neutral within the JavaScript world; meant to be composed with…
search-math-results
Find program-conditioned math results, constructions, examples, counterexamples, analogies, and background references. Use when the current active program needs repair, mutation, analogy, a program shift, or carefully gated obstruction search.
web-system-tests
The web realization of the system-tests contract — browser-driven system tests with Playwright against a running frontend. Owns the project layout (tests/), the Playwright configuration (baseURL plus webServer, cross-engine projects), the role- and label-based selector policy, code coverage as an opt-in second run…