Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add HetCreep/CoalMine --skill testability-canarygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HetCreep/CoalMineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hetcreep/coalmine/testability-canary)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hetcreep/coalmine/testability-canary"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hetcreep/coalmine/testability-canary.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00088 | $0.01915 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00958 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00383 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00192 |
Grade A, and why
testability-canary scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 78 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Testability Canary (Decoupling & Mockability Audit)
Language: Generate EVERYTHING at runtime in the user's language — questions, answer options, menu labels, recommendations, report narrative. Detect from their messages; never default to English just because this file is English. English is allowed only for technical terms: commands, paths, code identifiers, severity labels (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW), and tier names (Light/Standard/Heavy).
Config reads — every config key, always the CASCADE, never the bare project file: ~/.claude/.coalmine.json first, then the project config (own agent dir → other known agent dirs → legacy <gitroot>/.coalmine.json), project wins per key. A bare project read is ABSENT on a machine configured only globally, so it silently yields defaults.
Audit code to ensure it is decoupled, modular, and easy to cover with automated tests.
Auditing Categories
- Hardcoded Constructors — instantiating deps inside classes (
new DatabaseClient()) instead of injecting via constructor/factory (prevents mocking). - SRP Violations — a class or method doing too many distinct duties (e.g. a service that also parses JSON and formats UI).
- Static Dependencies — reliance on global static methods or Singletons that make test isolation impossible.
- Time & Environment Coupling — direct
DateTime.Now,fs, orprocess.envcalls without an abstraction layer (fragile time/path-sensitive tests). - Private Logic Gaps — complex business logic hidden in private methods that can't be tested directly (extract to testable helpers).
Per-stack patterns and the mock-strategy vocabulary: read references/checks.md before scanning.
Fix mode (choice-gated)
In Agent Context, after the report, present via ask_question:
- Apply safe refactoring: extract hardcoded initializations into constructor params (DI) + add interface definitions. Each fix: checkpoint (git stash/commit in a git repo; else copy the file aside — never assume git) → apply → build + tests → auto-revert if newly red.
- Let me pick: user selects specific refactoring moves.
- Report only: exit unchanged.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed · +2 lines b2571e5f66cd
- 8d ago First seen · 76 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A 8c4c199f7c26
testability-canary is a skill published in the GitHub repository HetCreep/CoalMine (12 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 1,915 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
flockion_code_review
Reviews Flockion code, diffs, pull requests, generated files, and refactors for correctness, simplicity, maintainability, file size, type safety, accessibility, security, observability, and overengineering. Use for TypeScript, React, Python, APIs, agents, YAML, Bicep, GitHub Actions, and cloud automation code.
agent-watchdog
Use when asked to watch, babysit, audit, review, compare, or fix another agent's work from a Codex session ID, Claude Code session/transcript, chat/thread link, PR, branch, log, or pasted run summary. Monitor until the other agent is done or blocked, reconstruct what the user asked, independently investigate the same…
comet-verify
Comet Phase 4: Verify and Close. Invoke with /comet-verify. Verify implementation matches design, handle development branch.
brooks-sweep
Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user…
answer-reviewer-questions
For each reviewer question on a PR, recall implementation reasoning and compose a raw answer. Use when the user asks to "answer reviewer questions", "draft answers to PR questions", or "explain reviewer questions".
package-optimizer
Evaluate one existing package or bounded package family from recorded evaluator evidence and a capability profile, then propose retain, simplify, strengthen, retire, or inconclusive without editing. Use when optimizing a skill, agent, hook, rule, command, utility, or preset; evaluating whether package detail is…