Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to hexxla/mcp-ratchet. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hexxla/mcp-ratchet/main/.windsurf/skills/security-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hexxla/mcp-ratchetWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hexxla/mcp-ratchet/security-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hexxla/mcp-ratchet/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hexxla/mcp-ratchet/security-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hexxla/mcp-ratchet/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hexxla/mcp-ratchet/security-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00063 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00025 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00013 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00006 |
Grade A, and why
security-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Security Review Skill
When reviewing code:
- Look for hardcoded secrets or credentials
- Check for insecure error handling or logging of sensitive data
- Verify input validation and context usage
- Ensure compliance with
rules/security.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 13 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A c7d088bcb876
security-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository hexxla/mcp-ratchet (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 63 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Structured code review prompt with language and focus area.
go-code-review
Use when reviewing Go code or checking code against community style standards. Also use proactively before submitting a Go PR or when reviewing any Go code changes, even if the user doesn't explicitly request a style review. Does not cover language-specific syntax — delegates to specialized skills.
code-review
Review every changeset before merge.
skill
Read Reddit threads, browse subreddits, search posts, and check user profiles. Full comment trees with automatic expansion of collapsed threads. No auth needed.
code-review
Systematic code review process with focus on quality, security, and best practices.
symbolpeek
Token-efficient code, JSON, and Markdown navigation; use before whole-file reads.