Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to hexxla/mcp-ratchet. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hexxla/mcp-ratchet/main/.windsurf/skills/security-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hexxla/mcp-ratchetWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hexxla/mcp-ratchet/security-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hexxla/mcp-ratchet/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hexxla/mcp-ratchet/security-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hexxla/mcp-ratchet/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hexxla/mcp-ratchet/security-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00063 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00032 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00013 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00006 |
Grade A, and why
security-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Security Review Skill
When reviewing code:
- Look for hardcoded secrets or credentials
- Check for insecure error handling or logging of sensitive data
- Verify input validation and context usage
- Ensure compliance with
rules/security.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 13 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A c7d088bcb876
security-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository hexxla/mcp-ratchet (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 63 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Structured code review prompt with language and focus area.
go-code-review
Use when reviewing Go code or checking code against community style standards. Also use proactively before submitting a Go PR or when reviewing any Go code changes, even if the user doesn't explicitly request a style review. Does not cover language-specific syntax — delegates to specialized skills.
skill
Read Reddit threads, browse subreddits, search posts, and check user profiles. Full comment trees with automatic expansion of collapsed threads. No auth needed.
symbolpeek
Token-efficient code, JSON, and Markdown navigation; use before whole-file reads.
code-review
Systematic code review process with focus on quality, security, and best practices.
code-analysis
Analyze code quality, identify bugs, performance issues and security vulnerabilities. Use when the user wants to review code files or find problems in source code.