Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to heypinchy/pinchy. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/heypinchy/pinchy/main/.claude/skills/review-docs/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/heypinchy/pinchyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/heypinchy/pinchy/review-docs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/heypinchy/pinchy/review-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/heypinchy/pinchy/review-docs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/heypinchy/pinchy/review-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/heypinchy/pinchy/review-docs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00095 | $0.01232 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00616 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00246 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00123 |
Grade A, and why
review-docs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 135 lines · 95 tokens per session scan A eae4b8ce000f
review-docs is a skill published in the GitHub repository heypinchy/pinchy (177 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 95 tokens to every session and 1,232 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
github_read
Read access: repos, issues, PRs, files, branches, workflows, runs.
security-audit
Security review methodology for server infrastructure. AUTO-CONSULT when: user asks for security check, audit, or hardening review, or when investigating suspicious activity.
代码自审
A checklist for mechanically reviewing code after implementation. It checks module boundaries, dependency cycles, requirement links, lint and type errors, security issues, and repeated or dead code.
continual-learning
Nightly refinement of an existing per-repo review-style prompt using this reviewer's own finding outcomes. Read confirmed (resolved-by-commit / thumbs-up) and dismissed (thumbs-down) findings, promote the bug patterns the team actually fixes, demote the false-positive patterns, reconcile against the current prompt…
meta-codereview-current-diff
Read the current uncommitted diff, run three independent reviewers (safety + tests-coverage + style) in parallel, then arbitrate a single BLOCK / BLOCKWITHOVERRIDE / PASSWITHNOTES verdict. Use before commit when you want a multi-perspective second-opinion instead of a single-reviewer agent loop.
frontend-feature
Build a new page, view, or data-driven feature in the Next.js frontend. Use when adding a route under the dashboard/marketing area, wiring UI to a backend endpoint, adding client state, or creating a localized page. Covers App Router, data fetching, Zustand stores, and i18n.