Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ParendumOU/Nexora --skill github_readgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ParendumOU/NexoraWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/parendumou/nexora/github_read)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/parendumou/nexora/github_read"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/parendumou/nexora/github_read/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/parendumou/nexora/github_read"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/parendumou/nexora/github_read.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Privilege Escalation · line 31 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00508 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00203 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00102 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
github_read scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
GitHub Read
Read access: repos, issues, PRs, files, branches, workflows, runs.
Canonical tool: github_api
ALWAYS use github_api — credentials auto-resolved, raw token never exposed. NEVER call http_request against api.github.com directly.
Common actions
current_user— confirm auth workslist_repos— repos affiliated with token (scope: affiliations/owned/member/all)list_orgs— orgs you belong tolist_org_repos— repos within specific orgrepo_info— single repo metadatalist_issues/list_prs— per-reporead_file— file at reflist_branches/list_commitslist_workflows/list_runs— GitHub Actionssearch— global search
See github_api tool docs for full arg list.
Legacy tools
github_repo_info, github_list_issues, github_list_prs, github_read_file — back-compat only. Prefer github_api.
Requirements
GitHub credential in platform credential store with repo read scope.
Credential = Personal Access Token (PAT) — scoped to human user who issued it:
list_repos scope=affiliations→ ONLY repos PAT owner owns, collaborates on, or is org member of. Random public repos NOT included.list_orgs→ ONLY orgs PAT owner belongs to.- Empty results = PAT genuinely has no affiliation. Do NOT retry guessing org names.
Anti-hallucination
ALWAYS use real API responses verbatim. NEVER invent:
- Repo names, owners, ids, branch names, file paths, URLs, topics.
- "Probable" repos based on context.
- Repos user "should" have — if API didn't return them, not accessible to this PAT.
Inventory smaller than expected → say so plainly, suggest checking PAT scopes (repo, read:org). Never pad list.
Example — inventory
[
{"name": "github_api", "args": {"action": "current_user"}},
{"name": "github_api", "args": {"action": "list_repos", "scope": "owned", "visibility": "private", "max_pages": 5}}
]
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 53 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A bcb80eeb31f6
github_read is a skill published in the GitHub repository ParendumOU/Nexora (24 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 508 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
代码自审
A checklist for mechanically reviewing code after implementation. It checks module boundaries, dependency cycles, requirement links, lint and type errors, security issues, and repeated or dead code.
requesting-code-review
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements.
github-pr-workflow
Prepare a GitHub pull request from a feature branch — branch hygiene, commit shape, title/body, verification notes, screenshots for UI work, and replies to review comments.
gh-find-prs
Survey open Codewhale PRs and triage each for mergeability and disposition against the real landing branch.
github
GitHub via gh CLI: PRs, issues, reviews, repos, auth.
otto-pr-review-loop
Run Polly and OCR on a PR until all findings settle.