Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add HezaoHezao/poirot --skill systematic-literature-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HezaoHezao/poirotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hezaohezao/poirot/systematic-literature-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hezaohezao/poirot/systematic-literature-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hezaohezao/poirot/systematic-literature-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hezaohezao/poirot/systematic-literature-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hezaohezao/poirot/systematic-literature-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.01646 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00823 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00329 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00165 |
Grade C, and why
systematic-literature-review scanned grade C with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Downloads and executes remote codehighSupply chain
curl | sh runs whatever the server returns today, which is not necessarily what it returned when this was reviewed.
curl -s "https://export.arxiv.org/api/query?search_query=all:transformer+attention&max_results=20&sortBy=relevance" | python3 -c " Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
> Poirot has neither, so this version uses `bash` with `curl` to the arXiv API How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 203 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Systematic Literature Review
Overview
Produces a structured systematic literature review (SLR) across multiple academic papers on a research topic. Given a topic query, searches arXiv, extracts structured metadata from each paper, synthesizes themes, and emits a final report with consistent citations.
Distinct from academic-paper-review: that skill does deep peer review of
a single paper. This skill does breadth-first synthesis across many papers.
Poirot note: The original deer-flow skill uses a bundled
scripts/arxiv_search.py+ subagenttasktool for parallel extraction. Poirot has neither, so this version usesbashwithcurlto the arXiv API directly + sequential single-agent extraction.
When to Use
- A literature survey on a topic ("survey transformer attention variants")
- A synthesis across multiple papers ("what do recent papers say about X")
- A systematic review with consistent citation format
- An annotated bibliography on a topic
- An overview of research trends in a field over a time window
Do not use when:
- User provides exactly one paper (use
academic-paper-review) - User asks a factual question (answer directly)
Workflow
Phase 1: Plan
Confirm with the user:
- Topic: the research area in plain English
- Scope: how many papers (default 20, hard upper bound 50), optional time
window, optional arXiv category (e.g.
cs.CL) - Citation format: APA, IEEE, or BibTeX (default APA)
If user says "50+ papers", cap at 50 and explain synthesis quality degrades past that.
Phase 2: Search arXiv
Use bash with curl to the arXiv API. Extract 2-3 core keywords before
searching — don't pass the full topic description as the query.
# Search arXiv (use 2-3 core keywords, not the full topic)
curl -s "https://export.arxiv.org/api/query?search_query=all:transformer+attention&max_results=20&sortBy=relevance" | python3 -c "
import sys, xml.etree.ElementTree as ET, json
ns = {'a': 'http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'}
root = ET.fromstring(sys.stdin.read())
papers = []
for entry in root.findall('a:entry', ns):
papers.append({
'id': entry.find('a:id', ns).text.split('/')[-1],
'title': entry.find('a:title', ns).text.strip().replace('\n', ' '),
'authors': [a.find('a:name', ns).text for a in entry.findall('a:author', ns)],
'published': entry.find('a:published', ns).text[:10],
'abstract': entry.find('a:summary', ns).text.strip(),
'pdf_url': [l.get('href') for l in entry.findall('a:link', ns) if l.get('title') == 'pdf'],
'abs_url': entry.find('a:id', ns).text,
})
print(json.dumps(papers, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False))
"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 203 lines · 17 tokens per session scan C adf03e2ee610
systematic-literature-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository HezaoHezao/poirot (217 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 1,646 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 2 findings (downloads and executes remote code, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
papyrus-writing
Base skill for the Papyrus writing assistant — the conduct, paper-quality principles, and LaTeX house style that every Papyrus editing task builds on. Load this first when working on a .tex paper in Papyrus. For the mechanics of a specific task, also load papyrus-latex-comments, papyrus-latex-suggestions…
commit
Atomic git commit with conventional message. Use when the user says "commit", "save my changes", "commit this", or wants to create a git commit. Stages specific files, writes a conventional commit message with body explaining non-obvious decisions. Never uses git add -A.
python-run
Run and debug Python scripts in the project. Use when the user says "run python", "execute this script", "debug this py file", or wants to run/modify a .py file. Handles dependency checks, linting, execution, and error analysis.
hqe
Comprehensive codebase health auditing, remediation, and verification skill based on the canonical HQE Protocol v5.0.0.
cost-efficiency-analyzer
Analyzes cost structure, cost efficiency, and expense management from P&L data. Use when the user asks about costs, expenses, COGS, operating expenses, cost ratios, cost control, spending efficiency, margin compression from cost side, or wants to understand where money is going. Also use for "are we spending too…
computer-use
Read and drive native desktop applications through the accessibility layer — list on-screen apps, snapshot one window as a numbered element tree, then click / type / set a value / scroll / drag / run a named action, by element index or by screen coordinates. Use for work in a desktop app rather than a web page. Full…