Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add HezaoHezao/poirot --skill systematic-literature-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HezaoHezao/poirotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hezaohezao/poirot/systematic-literature-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hezaohezao/poirot/systematic-literature-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hezaohezao/poirot/systematic-literature-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hezaohezao/poirot/systematic-literature-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hezaohezao/poirot/systematic-literature-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.01646 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00658 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00329 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00165 |
Grade C, and why
systematic-literature-review scanned grade C with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Downloads and executes remote codehighSupply chain
curl | sh runs whatever the server returns today, which is not necessarily what it returned when this was reviewed.
curl -s "https://export.arxiv.org/api/query?search_query=all:transformer+attention&max_results=20&sortBy=relevance" | python3 -c " Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
> Poirot has neither, so this version uses `bash` with `curl` to the arXiv API How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 203 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Systematic Literature Review
Overview
Produces a structured systematic literature review (SLR) across multiple academic papers on a research topic. Given a topic query, searches arXiv, extracts structured metadata from each paper, synthesizes themes, and emits a final report with consistent citations.
Distinct from academic-paper-review: that skill does deep peer review of
a single paper. This skill does breadth-first synthesis across many papers.
Poirot note: The original deer-flow skill uses a bundled
scripts/arxiv_search.py+ subagenttasktool for parallel extraction. Poirot has neither, so this version usesbashwithcurlto the arXiv API directly + sequential single-agent extraction.
When to Use
- A literature survey on a topic ("survey transformer attention variants")
- A synthesis across multiple papers ("what do recent papers say about X")
- A systematic review with consistent citation format
- An annotated bibliography on a topic
- An overview of research trends in a field over a time window
Do not use when:
- User provides exactly one paper (use
academic-paper-review) - User asks a factual question (answer directly)
Workflow
Phase 1: Plan
Confirm with the user:
- Topic: the research area in plain English
- Scope: how many papers (default 20, hard upper bound 50), optional time
window, optional arXiv category (e.g.
cs.CL) - Citation format: APA, IEEE, or BibTeX (default APA)
If user says "50+ papers", cap at 50 and explain synthesis quality degrades past that.
Phase 2: Search arXiv
Use bash with curl to the arXiv API. Extract 2-3 core keywords before
searching — don't pass the full topic description as the query.
# Search arXiv (use 2-3 core keywords, not the full topic)
curl -s "https://export.arxiv.org/api/query?search_query=all:transformer+attention&max_results=20&sortBy=relevance" | python3 -c "
import sys, xml.etree.ElementTree as ET, json
ns = {'a': 'http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'}
root = ET.fromstring(sys.stdin.read())
papers = []
for entry in root.findall('a:entry', ns):
papers.append({
'id': entry.find('a:id', ns).text.split('/')[-1],
'title': entry.find('a:title', ns).text.strip().replace('\n', ' '),
'authors': [a.find('a:name', ns).text for a in entry.findall('a:author', ns)],
'published': entry.find('a:published', ns).text[:10],
'abstract': entry.find('a:summary', ns).text.strip(),
'pdf_url': [l.get('href') for l in entry.findall('a:link', ns) if l.get('title') == 'pdf'],
'abs_url': entry.find('a:id', ns).text,
})
print(json.dumps(papers, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False))
"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 203 lines · 17 tokens per session scan C adf03e2ee610
systematic-literature-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository HezaoHezao/poirot (260 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 1,646 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it C with 2 findings (downloads and executes remote code, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
systematic-literature-review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| systematic-literature-reviewHezaoHezao/poirot | Skill | 260 | 3mo ago | MIT | C | 17 | Claude Code |
| papyrus-writingkirodotdev/KiroCrew | Skill | 4.8k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 70 | Claude Code, Codex |
| bmad-correct-coursealvin-reyes/better-agentic-ide | Skill | 45 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 53 | Claude Code |
| bmad-specalvin-reyes/better-agentic-ide | Skill | 45 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 76 | Claude Code |
| bmad-deep-reconalvin-reyes/better-agentic-ide | Skill | 45 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 161 | Claude Code |
| bmad-ticketalvin-reyes/better-agentic-ide | Skill | 45 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 91 | Claude Code |
| bmad-evalalvin-reyes/better-agentic-ide | Skill | 45 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 101 | Claude Code |