systematic-literature-review

systematic-literature-review is a skill for Claude Code from HezaoHezao/poirot. It costs 17 tokens per session (1,646 once invoked), scanned C, original, MIT.

A workflow for systematically reviewing multiple arXiv papers. arXiv is an online repository where researchers share research papers, often before formal publication.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to survey a topic, extract paper metadata, compare themes, track research trends, create an annotated bibliography, and produce a cited synthesis.
Why use it?
It helps organize findings across many papers instead of producing a deep review of only one paper.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Good fit Use it to survey a topic, extract paper metadata, compare themes, track research trends, create an annotated bibliography, and produce a cited synthesis.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/hezaohezao/poirot/systematic-literature-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add HezaoHezao/poirot --skill systematic-literature-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HezaoHezao/poirot

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for systematic-literature-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hezaohezao/poirot/systematic-literature-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hezaohezao/poirot/systematic-literature-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hezaohezao/poirot/systematic-literature-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hezaohezao/poirot/systematic-literature-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for systematic-literature-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hezaohezao/poirot/systematic-literature-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hezaohezao/poirot/systematic-literature-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 17 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,646 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan C 2 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00017 $0.01646
Opus 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00658
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00003 $0.00329
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00165

Measured 2mo ago against content hash adf03e2ee610, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade C, and why

systematic-literature-review scanned grade C with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Downloads and executes remote codehighSupply chain

curl | sh runs whatever the server returns today, which is not necessarily what it returned when this was reviewed.

curl -s "https://export.arxiv.org/api/query?search_query=all:transformer+attention&max_results=20&sortBy=relevance" | python3 -c "

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

> Poirot has neither, so this version uses `bash` with `curl` to the arXiv API
poirot/backend/agents/skill/builtin_skills/research/systematic-literature-review/SKILL.md · 203 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 203 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Systematic Literature Review

Overview

Produces a structured systematic literature review (SLR) across multiple academic papers on a research topic. Given a topic query, searches arXiv, extracts structured metadata from each paper, synthesizes themes, and emits a final report with consistent citations.

Distinct from academic-paper-review: that skill does deep peer review of a single paper. This skill does breadth-first synthesis across many papers.

Poirot note: The original deer-flow skill uses a bundled scripts/arxiv_search.py + subagent task tool for parallel extraction. Poirot has neither, so this version uses bash with curl to the arXiv API directly + sequential single-agent extraction.

When to Use

  • A literature survey on a topic ("survey transformer attention variants")
  • A synthesis across multiple papers ("what do recent papers say about X")
  • A systematic review with consistent citation format
  • An annotated bibliography on a topic
  • An overview of research trends in a field over a time window

Do not use when:

  • User provides exactly one paper (use academic-paper-review)
  • User asks a factual question (answer directly)

Workflow

Phase 1: Plan

Confirm with the user:

  • Topic: the research area in plain English
  • Scope: how many papers (default 20, hard upper bound 50), optional time window, optional arXiv category (e.g. cs.CL)
  • Citation format: APA, IEEE, or BibTeX (default APA)

If user says "50+ papers", cap at 50 and explain synthesis quality degrades past that.

Phase 2: Search arXiv

Use bash with curl to the arXiv API. Extract 2-3 core keywords before searching — don't pass the full topic description as the query.

# Search arXiv (use 2-3 core keywords, not the full topic)
curl -s "https://export.arxiv.org/api/query?search_query=all:transformer+attention&max_results=20&sortBy=relevance" | python3 -c "
import sys, xml.etree.ElementTree as ET, json
ns = {'a': 'http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'}
root = ET.fromstring(sys.stdin.read())
papers = []
for entry in root.findall('a:entry', ns):
    papers.append({
        'id': entry.find('a:id', ns).text.split('/')[-1],
        'title': entry.find('a:title', ns).text.strip().replace('\n', ' '),
        'authors': [a.find('a:name', ns).text for a in entry.findall('a:author', ns)],
        'published': entry.find('a:published', ns).text[:10],
        'abstract': entry.find('a:summary', ns).text.strip(),
        'pdf_url': [l.get('href') for l in entry.findall('a:link', ns) if l.get('title') == 'pdf'],
        'abs_url': entry.find('a:id', ns).text,
    })
print(json.dumps(papers, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False))
"

Read the full file on GitHub · 203 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 203 lines · 17 tokens per session scan C adf03e2ee610

Subscribe to this mod's changes

systematic-literature-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository HezaoHezao/poirot (260 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 1,646 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it C with 2 findings (downloads and executes remote code, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

systematic-literature-review compared with skills from other repositories

systematic-literature-review next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
systematic-literature-reviewHezaoHezao/poirotSkill2603mo agoMITC17Claude Code
papyrus-writingkirodotdev/KiroCrewSkill4.8kyesterdayApache-2.0A70Claude Code, Codex
bmad-correct-coursealvin-reyes/better-agentic-ideSkill452d agoMITA53Claude Code
bmad-specalvin-reyes/better-agentic-ideSkill452d agoMITA76Claude Code
bmad-deep-reconalvin-reyes/better-agentic-ideSkill452d agoMITA161Claude Code
bmad-ticketalvin-reyes/better-agentic-ideSkill452d agoMITA91Claude Code
bmad-evalalvin-reyes/better-agentic-ideSkill452d agoMITA101Claude Code