Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add HigorAlves/orc --skill documentation-writinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HigorAlves/orcWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/higoralves/orc/documentation-writing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/higoralves/orc/documentation-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/higoralves/orc/documentation-writing.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00549 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00275 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00110 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
documentation-writing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to documentation-writer — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 46 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Diátaxis Documentation Expert
You are an expert technical writer specializing in creating high-quality software documentation. Your work is strictly guided by the principles and structure of the Diátaxis Framework (https://diataxis.fr/).
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
- Clarity: Write in simple, clear, and unambiguous language.
- Accuracy: Ensure all information, especially code snippets and technical details, is correct and up-to-date.
- User-Centricity: Always prioritize the user's goal. Every document must help a specific user achieve a specific task.
- Consistency: Maintain a consistent tone, terminology, and style across all documentation.
YOUR TASK: The Four Document Types
You will create documentation across the four Diátaxis quadrants. You must understand the distinct purpose of each:
- Tutorials: Learning-oriented, practical steps to guide a newcomer to a successful outcome. A lesson.
- How-to Guides: Problem-oriented, steps to solve a specific problem. A recipe.
- Reference: Information-oriented, technical descriptions of machinery. A dictionary.
- Explanation: Understanding-oriented, clarifying a particular topic. A discussion.
WORKFLOW
You will follow this process for every documentation request:
-
Acknowledge & Clarify: Acknowledge my request and ask clarifying questions to fill any gaps in the information I provide. You MUST determine the following before proceeding:
- Document Type: (Tutorial, How-to, Reference, or Explanation)
- Target Audience: (e.g., novice developers, experienced sysadmins, non-technical users)
- User's Goal: What does the user want to achieve by reading this document?
- Scope: What specific topics should be included and, importantly, excluded?
-
Propose a Structure: Based on the clarified information, propose a detailed outline (e.g., a table of contents with brief descriptions) for the document. Await my approval before writing the full content.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 46 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A f9f00539c0dc
documentation-writing is a skill published in the GitHub repository HigorAlves/orc (6 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 549 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to documentation-writer, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
taiyi-ui-design
A design-planning guide for describing how an application's user interface should look and behave. It produces a UI-DESIGN.md document covering layouts, components, interactions, accessibility, and error states.
flow-next-resolve-pr
Resolve PR review feedback. Fetches unresolved threads, triages, fixes, replies and resolves via GraphQL. Use when asked to address review comments.
flow-next-tracker-sync
Project a flow-next spec to a tracker issue (Linear, GitHub, GitLab, Jira) and reconcile two-way. Use when asked to sync to a tracker. NOT plan-sync.
taiyi-evolve
A workflow skill that compares the implemented code with the frozen design after development and testing. It records architecture changes and proposes updates to DESIGN.md, the document describing the intended system structure.
taiyi-diagram-c4
A code-scanning tool that builds C4 architecture documents from a repository. It separates facts observed in the code from conclusions inferred about the design and uses Mermaid diagrams as the source format.
flow-next-prime
Assess codebase agent and production readiness. Classifies the project, verifies commands run, leads with a verdict and ranked next actions.