Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add himanshu231204/agent-skills --skill contributor-readygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/himanshu231204/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/himanshu231204/agent-skills/contributor-ready)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/himanshu231204/agent-skills/contributor-ready"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/himanshu231204/agent-skills/contributor-ready/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/himanshu231204/agent-skills/contributor-ready"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/himanshu231204/agent-skills/contributor-ready.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.01085 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00543 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00217 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00109 |
Grade A, and why
contributor-ready scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 115 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
contributor-ready
The universal AI coding agent skill for preparing repositories for open source contributors.
Analyze, document, and prepare any repository for open source contribution. This skill does not generate generic templates — it inspects your actual codebase and produces repository-specific artifacts.
Commands
| Command | What It Does |
|---|---|
contributor-ready audit |
Analyze repository, produce readiness report (no file changes) |
contributor-ready generate |
Create only the files that are missing |
contributor-ready improve |
Enhance existing documentation in place |
contributor-ready issues |
Identify real contribution opportunities from code analysis |
contributor-ready full |
Audit, generate, issues, report — complete pipeline |
Quick Start
Run contributor-ready full on this repository to make it contributor-ready.
How It Works
- Analyze — Detect project type, languages, frameworks, tooling, and current open source readiness
- Score — Rate six dimensions (Documentation, GitHub Community, CI/CD, Testing, Developer Experience, Security) using weighted scoring from
reference.md - Generate — Create missing artifacts using templates and repository-specific content
- Report — Produce a readiness report with scores, generated artifacts, and prioritized next steps
Safe Mode
- Never overwrites existing files unless explicitly requested
- Never generates placeholder content
- Never assumes technology without detection
- Always improves existing documentation when possible
- Always produces repository-specific output
To regenerate an existing file, request it explicitly:
Regenerate the README.md for this repository.
Architecture
contributor-ready/
├── skill.md # Entry point — this file
├── AGENT.md # Agent orchestration and command routing
├── prompt.md # System prompt for the skill
├── reference.md # Detection, scoring, output format (single source of truth)
├── checklist.md # Readiness scoring tables
├── validation.md # Skill quality and maintenance checklists
├── changelog.md # Improvement history
├── quality-report.md # Quality assessment report
├── agents/ # Specialized agent instructions
│ ├── audit.md # Repository analysis
│ ├── docs.md # Documentation generation
│ ├── github.md # GitHub community files
│ ├── issues.md # Contribution opportunities
│ ├── architecture.md # Architecture mapping
│ ├── roadmap.md # Roadmap generation
│ ├── ci.md # CI/CD workflows
│ ├── devex.md # Developer experience
│ ├── release.md # Release management
│ └── report.md # Readiness report
├── templates/ # Reusable documentation templates
│ ├── README.md
│ ├── CONTRIBUTING.md
│ ├── CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
│ ├── SECURITY.md
│ ├── SUPPORT.md
│ ├── ROADMAP.md
│ ├── CHANGELOG.md
│ ├── DEVELOPMENT.md
│ ├── ARCHITECTURE.md
│ ├── ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md
│ └── PR_TEMPLATE.md
├── examples/ # Technology-specific guides
│ ├── python.md
│ ├── fastapi.md
│ ├── react.md
│ ├── nextjs.md
│ ├── go.md
│ ├── rust.md
│ ├── cli.md
│ ├── library.md
│ └── chrome-extension.md
└── assets/ # Static assets and resources
What ships with it
39 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- AGENT.md 4.4 KB
- agents/architecture.md 1.6 KB
- agents/audit.md 3.1 KB
- agents/ci.md 2.4 KB
- agents/devex.md 1.8 KB
- agents/docs.md 2.5 KB
- agents/github.md 2.3 KB
- agents/issues.md 2.9 KB
- agents/release.md 1.8 KB
- agents/report.md 1.9 KB
- agents/roadmap.md 1.7 KB
- changelog.md 4.2 KB
- checklist.md 2.4 KB
- examples/chrome-extension.md 11 KB
- examples/cli.md 7.6 KB
- examples/fastapi.md 11 KB
- examples/go.md 6.5 KB
- examples/library.md 10 KB
- examples/nextjs.md 6.4 KB
- examples/python.md 7.8 KB
- examples/react.md 10 KB
- examples/rust.md 6.8 KB
- LICENSE 1.0 KB
- prompt.md 4.0 KB
- quality-report.md 8.5 KB
- README.md 4.9 KB
- reference.md 11 KB
- templates/ARCHITECTURE.md 2.3 KB
- templates/CHANGELOG.md 797 B
- templates/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md 5.1 KB
- templates/CONTRIBUTING.md 4.2 KB
- templates/DEVELOPMENT.md 2.7 KB
- templates/ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md 518 B
- templates/PR_TEMPLATE.md 1.2 KB
- templates/README.md 1.8 KB
- templates/ROADMAP.md 1.5 KB
- templates/SECURITY.md 2.1 KB
- templates/SUPPORT.md 2.3 KB
- validation.md 4.9 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 115 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A bdce24a4cc15
contributor-ready is a skill published in the GitHub repository himanshu231204/agent-skills (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,085 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…