Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add hiromaily/go-crypto-wallet --skill fix-pr-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hiromaily/go-crypto-walletWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hiromaily/go-crypto-wallet/fix-pr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hiromaily/go-crypto-wallet/fix-pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hiromaily/go-crypto-wallet/fix-pr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hiromaily/go-crypto-wallet/fix-pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hiromaily/go-crypto-wallet/fix-pr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00870 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00435 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00174 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
fix-pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 119 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Fix PR Review Workflow
Workflow for addressing review comments on pull requests.
Expected Command Format
Please revise the reviews at https://github.com/{owner}/{repo}/pull/{pr_number}#pullrequestreview-{review_id} and reply to each review with your results.
Input Formats
User may provide either:
- PR number:
563,#563 - Full review URL:
https://github.com/{owner}/{repo}/pull/{pr_number}#pullrequestreview-{review_id}
Extract {pr_number} (and optionally {review_id}) from the input.
Process Overview
1. Fetch PR details and review comments
2. Classify files and load development skill
3. Fix each comment
4. Run verification
5. Commit and push changes
6. Reply to each review comment on GitHub
Step 1: Fetch PR Information
gh pr view {pr_number}
gh pr diff {pr_number} --name-only
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews/{review_id}/comments
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/comments
Step 2: Classify and Load Skill
Classify modified files and load the appropriate development skill.
For file-type-to-skill mapping, see .claude/rules/general.md (Language-Specific Skills table).
Step 3: Address ALL Comments
IMPORTANT: Every review comment must be addressed. Do not skip or miss any comment.
- List all comments from the API response
- Sort by priority: Security > Functionality > Code Quality
- Fix each one, one by one
- Track status: FIXED, ALREADY APPLIED, or SKIPPED
Step 4: Run Verification
Run verification commands from the loaded development skill.
For verification commands by file type, see .claude/rules/task-context-loading.md (Verification Commands by File Type).
If PR modifies multiple file types, run all applicable verification commands.
Step 5: Commit and Push
Follow git-workflow skill for commit conventions.
git add .
git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
fix(scope): address PR review comments
- Fix: [specific fix 1]
- Fix: [specific fix 2]
EOF
)"
git push
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 119 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 9541751a0f1a
fix-pr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository hiromaily/go-crypto-wallet (127 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 870 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.
Other skills, from other repositories
skill-pr-prep
Bundle pull.md and screenshot placeholders for PR.
git-wrapup
Land working-tree changes as logical commits — the work grouped by concern, topped by a release commit (version bump, changelog, regenerated artifacts) and an annotated tag. Verify, commit, tag. Stops at "committed and tagged locally" — no push, no publish. The release-and-publish skill picks up from here. Distilled…
github-pr-workflow
Prepare a GitHub pull request from a feature branch — branch hygiene, commit shape, title/body, verification notes, screenshots for UI work, and replies to review comments.
review-delta
Review only changes since last commit using impact analysis. Token-efficient delta review with automatic blast-radius detection.
work-unit-commits
Plan commits as reviewable work units. Trigger: implementation, commit splitting, chained PRs, or keeping tests and docs with code.
pr-pending-feedback
Evaluate pending (unsubmitted) review comments on the current branch's PR and, after user confirmation, address each in a separate sub-agent and separate commit.